Brace: Pope Benedict XVI “sudden decline in health”

Ed Pentin reports aggravated kidney failure.

If Benedict and the papacy itself are the “Katechon” … the “what” and the “he” described in 2 Thess 2, and he/it is about to be out of the way, then all Hell is literally about to break loose. Stay confessed.

“And we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and of our gathering together unto Him: That you be not easily moved from your sense, nor be terrified, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by epistle, as sent from us, as if the day of the Lord were at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition, who opposeth, and is lifted up above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God. Remember you not, that when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now you know what withholdeth, that he may be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity already worketh; only that he who now holdeth, do hold, until he be taken out of the way. And then that wicked one shall be revealed whom the Lord Jesus shall kill with the spirit of His mouth; and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming, him, whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs, and lying wonders, And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity.” 2 Thess. 2:1-11

25 thoughts on “Brace: Pope Benedict XVI “sudden decline in health””

  1. I am bracing myself, but when I discuss this with other Catholics, what would one say when the fact is brought up that there have been brief periods without a pope in the past?

    1. Feast of the Holy Innocents
      Fourth Day of Christmas

      A decade of Anti-pope Bergoglio is not a brief period.

      First off, Pope Benedict ain’t dead yet.

      If he does die, though, and Francis XXXX (40th antipope in history) outlives him, tell ’em we need a conclave now to elect a true pope, and some sort of council to depose the false pope.

  2. I pray he recovers. He’s 95 though. But is he the katechon? WHy would the katechon fake resign and allow a heretic and antipope to roost? Look at what Bergoglio has done already.

    It is logical that things will get worse because there will be nothing to stop Bergoglio and the anti-Church if B16 dies. But we should remember that B16 is why we are in this awesome mess, why Pachamama is slaking her thirst for blood with a mass worldwide genocide.

    Yes it will get worse. Imagine where we would be if Benedict had stayed put instead of bowing out. Katechon? I don’t know. But it’s logical that it will get worse.

    1. Oh it’ll get A LOT worse if our holy father, Pope Benedict XVI dies before antipope Bergoglio and/or the official acknowledgment and nullification of this antipapacy. Please everyone: offer Rosaries, Mass intentions, fasting, anything you can for Pope Benedict.

    2. I don’t think we have all the information on Benedict. If I told you there is a satanic cult controlling the world trying to usher the reign of the antichrist, you would call me gnostic or a tin foil hat wearer. The truth about this “pandemic” is a small portion revealing the evils of this cult. This cult uses the media and human psychology to manipulate the masses. I think that he might be the kathecon, in that holding office he prevents rome from fully defecting. Although there is much confusion, Jesus’ true presence is still there in the mass. But someday the false prophet will replace the daily sacrifice with an abomination and then the great tribulation will begin, per Matthew 24.

    3. Of course he’s not the katechon.

      If I remember correctly the saintly Archbishop Vigano annointed Donald Trump as the katechon.

      Thank goodness Donald is in excellent health….and the secret military tribunals are in session.

      And, oh wait – Sidney Powell is still holding back the kracken.

      How can things possibly get worse?

  3. I know that many were thinking that Pope Benedict was the “Pope of the Assassination” that Father Gruner spoke about when he references the prophecies of stigmatist Antonio Ruffini. I myself thought that Pope Benedict would eventually be murdered and that his fear of death and martyrdom is what led to this current disaster in the Church. But I thought that he would eventually accept his cross. Could it be that Pope Benedict passes away in the coming days/weeks and that the next Pope will be the Pope of the Assassination? I remember someone saying (Dr. Mazza?) that they believe that Benedict may have named a true successor in a document that will be released upon his death. If this is the case, will the true pope have to go into hiding and eventually be killed as described in the third secret? How will we know who this true pope is? Will this document be kept secret? Is this next and last pope Peter the Roman?

    Or has Pope Benedict been slowly assassinated by poisoning? Death by a vaccine administered by a needle or “arrow?”

    So many questions. Such terribly troubling times. May God have mercy on Pope Benedict and all the world. Our Lady Undoer of Knots, pray for us.

    1. You’re putting us in the same boat as Bugnolo. That is a calumny. Bugnolo is a grifter. Holy Mother Church, as run by Francis, isn’t Holy Mother Church. It is the ANti-Church, and that is just a fact. If you think you’re a Catholic by following the teachings of Bergoglio, you’re very, very lost. And you’re not Catholic. Francis is an antipope and a heretic.

      1. If Bergoglio is an anti pope heading up the AntiChurch, why do you go to Masses where he’s commemorated? As far as the NO Church, what has changed since Bergoglio took the reigns? Seriously, how is the VII Church under Bergoglio any different than it was under Benedict?

        1. The mass is said by validly ordained priests. The mass is about Jesus Christ. It’s not about an anti-pope.
          This situation has happened throughout church history.

          Sedes are beset by incredible fractures of logic only surpassed by zealotry. You act as if nothing happened Pre Vatican 2. You’d be the type of person angry at the Counter Reformation and would’be started your own little movement then.

          There is ONE Church. The goal is to heal it from within, not proclaim a new church outside it.

          Sedes are no better than Protestants.

          THanks though for your caring about the death of our pope.

        2. And ps., why does a sede care about what the Church does anyway? If you’re observing the “True Church” you should be comfortable in that knowledge and idk, stay off Catholic web sites? Or start you own Sede site.

          To paraphrase an old joke. “How can you tell if someone is a sedevacantist?” Answer: “Don’t worry, they’ll tell you.”

          Your false piety and schtick is annoying.

    2. Didn’t you hear that it’s now a sin to proselytize? Right now your sarcastic behavior is not attractive and probably sinful. Instead, we should dialogue and be fraternal.

  4. I wondered for quite a while how the biblical false prophet will ascend to St Peter’s throne without anyone noticing. I now see in hindsight it may happen because people don’t notice the real pope dying. My question is if Francis might be the false prophet or just an antipope who will repent before he dies.

    1. I don’t recall any antipope worshipping a demon in the holiest site in Christendom, nor wanting to start a “brotherhood” with the world’s religions.

      If Bergoglio isn’t the evil false prophet, he’ll do until the real one gets here.

      1. I think so too, but it might be someone else who will approve the changes to the mass. He told us a few days ago that he signed an agreement to be retired for health reasons. Whoever changes the mass (words of consecration) is the false prophet. Then that would mean his salvation is still possible.

        Apart from Judas, Satan, demons, and the antichrist, the False Prophet is the only one who we know (with certitude) will be damned. It does’t make sense that anyone who knows that will consciously choose to be damned.

  5. I never thought Benedict feared for his life. If he was up against the SWIFT bankers threats to the Vatican he knew he would lose.

  6. If Ann is correct and the AntiChurch led by Francis and the Catholic Church led by Benedict co-exist in the same space, does Benedict’s death change anything? Or does the popeless Catholic Church still co-exist with the antiChurch? Is it like 50/50? 90/10? Or does there have to be even more apostasy before we can call it 100% the AntiChurch?

    1. Only you and the Sedes, ironically, call it 100% anti-Church. As you are actually part of a false church, and have actually apostasised. Funny that.

      Benedict is pope. Ergo, he will be the last true pope if Barnhardt is correct.

      Jesus never promised a perfect CHurch. Indeed, wasn’t Peter the one that denied him 3 times while Christ was still alive? This should give halfway smart Catholics insight. Vatican 2 was awful. In this history of the Church , 60 years is very short time. Rather than go ape-sh– and start your own movement, a sane Catholic would try, in his own way, to get the Church back on track.

      But sedes aren’t sane. They’re basically protestants focused on one moment in time with little regard for Jesus CHrist Himself, the Church He founded nor the warriors within it trying save it.

      And yet here you are, doing your little dance. You guys are like the libertarians of Catholicism. Good for nothing, clownish, disruptive.

      1. “Benedict is pope. Ergo, he will be the last true pope if Barnhardt is correct.”

        Not necessarily. If Ann is correct, we will be in an inter-regnum. Another true Pope can be elected. It would require (1) recognition of Bergoglio as an anti-pope and a canonically valid election of another, or (2) Bergoglio “resigning” or otherwise giving up his claim to office and a canonically valid election of another.

Leave a Reply to Susan2Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.