Kari Lake lawsuit dismissed, next comes wrongthink punishment phase

Word out this morning Katie Hobbs seeking up to $700K restitution from Lake for daring to present evidence of fraud and disenfranchisement. -nvp

By Rachel Alexander

The trial court judge in Kari Lake’s election lawsuit predictably threw out her case on Saturday, putting on a sham trial that on the surface looked fair to the general public that doesn’t know any better, but to legal minds was a travesty of justice. Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson only gave her two days for a trial and issued his ruling immediately afterwards…

The standard should have been whether voters were disenfranchised, not all the additional hoops Thompson added. If inner city blacks had been disenfranchised, Thompson would not have added all those extra requirements…the standard should have been whether there was voter suppression.

Instead, Thompson said Lake had to show an extremely vague, high bar in order to prevail, that an election official intentionally caused the printer changes in order to change the results of the election, and that it did affect the outcome. He explained away many of the disturbing election anomalies as accidents or mere coincidences. He ignored the vast majority of them; in a show of arrogance, his opinion was less than eight pages long.

Thompson completely ignored all the voters who saw the long lines and gave up trying to vote, as if they didn’t count. Considering probably well over half of the voting locations in Maricopa County were affected, not to mention they were almost all in heavily Republican areas, this was no small disenfranchisement. Many voters have come forward and told how they were unable to vote for this reason or similar, such as a man who couldn’t find parking in time due to the overcrowded parking lot.

Even with the higher burden required by Thompson, well-known lawyer Viva Frei, whose real name is David Freheit, said Lake’s team showed there was intentionality and believed the case was a slam dunk.

It was clear early on Thompson was going to rule against Lake, throwing out eight of her 10 claims, which included observers’ testimony that 90% of mismatched signatures were accepted. In doing so, he trivialized important, good-faith arguments about constitutional and civil rights. The two whittled-down claims he kept allowed him to hold a trial to appear fair, then declare everything OK and the county in the right…

6 thoughts on “Kari Lake lawsuit dismissed, next comes wrongthink punishment phase”

  1. If the appeal doesn’t work (it won’t, bar a miracle, because the sacredness of Americanism and demoncracee must be protected… for the greater good), your only option next time is NOT TO VOTE, and whenever they ask you why, tell them, “I lost faith in elections because of Judge Peter Thompson.” This is all you must ever say from now on whenever the Republicans come begging or reporters or pollsters start asking. Yes, Democrats will win, but they were always going to rig it, so why should you bother, or even feel bad about the Republican party? Because sure as night follows day, Republicans will be on TV saying how Lake should drop this whole thing and respect the COURT’s decision (*bow* blessings be upon it), because we all need people to believe in the integrity of THE SYSTEM (inc) rather than undermine it. It is our religion after all, and it is infallible! USA! USA! USA!

    Keep in mind that the Twitter Files revealed that the precious TRUMP administration was the first to begin censoring vexxine skepticism on Twitter. And also that 3-time World Consecration Winner, Russia, and Vladimir Putin, love clot-shutting you and moving you forcibly into technocracy amd digital controlled tagging and tracking just as much if not more than anyone else. Trump has never apologixed or acknowledged a problem with the vexxines. Putin loves, ABSOLUTELY LOVES, vexxines and passports. It is all kayfabe.

    Is DeSantis genuine? Will he prevail? I pray he does…

    For those of you in states where you know the election process is rigged and the court’s will do nothing. Take your lawn signs down and burn them and do anything else on election day. Your only option is to now make your non-participation the story. If enough if you do, then you will hopefully wake up the next guy and take him one step closer to conversion towards God without post-humus America getting in the way.

  2. Republicans are far more dangerous then Democrats, in that they pretend to be something they are not.

    Ditto for BXVI.

  3. The little demon in all of this no one is paying attention to is attorney Mark Elias. He is a soros puppet/whore, who roams the countryside filing suits and threatening people. In the spring and early summer of 2020, in the middle of Pandemic Madness, he pushed mail-in voting. When states were reluctant to do mail in balloting, especially because they couldn’t covene the legislatures bc of Covid, he threatened class-action lawsuits. Ergo, secretaries of states all across America unconstitutionally implemented mail ins. And we had states like Pennsylvania send out 1,8 million ballots and get back 2.5. Then have a pedophile, compromised Chief Justice Roberts say that everything is moot (what a laugh) and here.we. are.

    Ps. Not that it would’ve been much better under Trump, I don’t think anything would be better since Bergoglio unleashed a demon, but the zeitgeist in America now is one of fear, hatred and totalitarianism, and Elias helped usher that in.

  4. Here is how the law is rigged, whereby it is up to the judge’s feelings about whether the overwhelming odds were a deliberate malicious act or a series of statistically unlikely “oopsies!” What do you want to bet the Republican judge is an evolutionist?


    As Paul Craig Roberts put it, “Evidence proved that ballots for Republican precincts were printed oversize so the ballot readers could not read them. The Republican judge ruled that this did not prove the ballots were intentionally printed oversize. In other words, the Republican judge ruled that it is OK for Democrats to steal elections as long as they did not mean to steal them. As long as the election was accidentally stolen, it is legit.”

    One may want to stretch “innocent until proven guilty”, okay, then why not nobody goes to jail, but REDO the election then? Will anyone at least get fired? I’m betting, no.

  5. the other possibility (to save face by putting lipstick on this pig of a system) is that the appellate courts overrule it, getting the “right” decision . . . just in time for the next election so let’s just forget about it and hold the next election.

    Then a new round of shenanigans with the next elections, lawsuit filed, bad trial court rulings, appeals, . . . rinse and repeat.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.