I’ve finally had the time to complete watching the Part 3 video from Miss B. Don’t be put off by the 2:40:00 length – consume it at 1.5x speed, and it goes by really fast because the content is captivating. It is easily the best of the three videos she has done, and at first I couldn’t quite put my finger on why. After all, could there really be anything new? Wouldn’t this just be rehashing all the old talking points? Why is it so captivating?

What it boils down to is her approach and delivery. It comes off like a courtroom drama, where Benedict’s invalid half-resignation is on trial, and the prosecution keeps introducing uppercuts and haymaker hooks as the defendant is on the ropes. It’s methodical. She drives home the point with page after page of Benedict’s own words and deeds. No mind-reading is necessary. No gnostic decoder ring is needed. Benedict tried to resign only the active governance of the papacy, delegating the governance to his “successor,” while Benedict himself retained the passive role of prayer and suffering. Since this is Substantial Error, the entire resignation was invalid per Canon 188, and Benedict remained the only pope until his death Dec 31, 2022.

As you examine the evidence, keep in mind the following axiom: Pope Benedict, in his act of resignation, needed to fully assent with his will to the total renunciation of the papacy in toto in order for it to be valid. If you find evidence, spoken, written, and visual evidence, that he did NOT intend to fully resign, that, on the contrary, he quite obviously intended to remain in some way papal, well then you have your answer. SUBSTANTIAL ERROR. -nvp

Bergoglian Antipapacy video Part 3: ENOUGH

FEAST OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST THE KING

https://praybenedictus.com/

h/t to Father Nix, additional links at the end.

Our Lady of Champion is an approved Marian apparition, the Blessed Virgin Mary having appeared in October 1859 to a 28 year old Belgian immigrant at Champion, Wisconsin, near Green Bay. The story is as follows.

Adele Brise (Brice) was born in Belgium to Lambert and Catherine Brise on January 30, 1831.  She and some companions made a vow to the Blessed Virgin at an early age to become religious sisters.  However, her parents soon moved the family to a new Catholic community in Wisconsin, founded by Belgian settlers.  One day as she was walking through the forest,  Adele saw a lady dressed in white, standing between two trees believed to be a maple and hemlock. (If you have never “walked through the forest” in this part of the world, especially Door County, you need to put it on your bucket list. Some of the trees are over a thousand years old. The smell alone is captivating. Go September if you can. -nvp)

The account continues:

A few days later, on what is believed to be Sunday, October 9, 1859, Adele walked to Mass with her sister and a friend. The Church was 10 miles away from home, but Adele made the journey every Sunday, no matter the weather. Along the same path, Adele saw the mysterious lady standing in the same spot between the two trees. However, Adele being the only one to see her, she and her companions continued their journey to Mass.

After Mass, Adele spoke to her parish priest, and he instructed her that if the lady appeared to her again to ask the question, “In God’s name, who are you and what do you want of me?”

On her journey home, Adele saw the lady for the third time. As she and her companions approached the hallowed spot, Adele could see the beautiful lady, clothed in dazzling white, with a yellow sash around her waist. Her dress fell to her feet in graceful folds. She had a crown of stars around her head, and her long golden wavy hair fell loosely over her shoulders. The lady had such a heavenly light around her that Adele could hardly look at her face. Overcome by the light, Adele fell to her knees and said, “In God’s name, who are you, and what do you want of me?”

The lady replied, “I am the Queen of Heaven who prays for the conversion of sinners, and I wish you to do the same. You received Holy Communion this morning and that is well. But you must do more. Make a general confession and offer Communion for the conversion of sinners. If they do not convert and do penance, my Son will be obliged to punish them.”

Adele’s companions, unable to see Our Lady asked, “Adele, who is it? Why can’t we see her as you do?”

“Kneel,” said Adele, “the Lady says she is the Queen of Heaven.”

The Blessed Lady gazed kindly upon them, saying, “Blessed are they that believe without seeing.” Then, looking toward Adele, the Queen of Heaven asked, “What are you doing here in idleness while your companions are working in the vineyard of my Son?”

“What more can I do, dear Lady?” asked Adele, weeping.

“Gather the children in this wild country and teach them what they should know for salvation.”

“But how shall I teach them who know so little myself?” Adele said.

“Teach them,” replied her radiant visitor, “their catechism, how to sign themselves with the sign of the Cross, and how to approach the sacraments; that is what I wish you to do. Go and fear nothing, I will help you.”

Adele then gave herself tirelessly to catechesis and eventually became a nun.

Full post, including America’s failed mission: https://padreperegrino.org/2023/10/wildamerica/

Site of the shrine in Wisconsin, with further details including the massive fire of 1871 and the miraculous protection of the shrine, sisters, liveststock: https://championshrine.org/our-story/

Our Lady of Fatima came to warn us what needed to be done, and she was ignored. Russia was never properly consecrated to her Immaculate Heart by a true pope in union with all the bishops. Seven different popes disobeyed our Blessed Mother. How in the world does that happen? Our Lady of LaSalette warned us. Our Lady of Akita warned us. If you haven’t studied these messages, you really need to. Take a look around, and consider the fate we truly deserve.

Have you ever wondered, why did they lie when purportedly releasing the Third Secret in the year 2000? Think about this. JPII, via Ratzinger and Sodano, read out an explanation that wasn’t remotely plausible. What was the motive? Why not just say nothing? Why deploy an obvious deception, knowing you’d be caught, when you could have made up something much more convincing?

While we may not have the complete Third Secret of Fatima, we know enough to properly inform our consciences.  Which means we are then morally bound to make prudential judgments. We have an obvious, obvious antipope squatting on the chair. We are about to have a synodal antichurch spewing heresy in all directions. WWIII may have begun last night, with the US bombing of Iranian Guard positions in Syria. Go to Confession and do what you can to warn others. Act, and God will act.

Here is a fantastic clip from Dr. Mazza’s interview on the Joe McClane show yesterday. Listen and learn:

Yes, it is FREE. Because truth shouldn’t be hidden behind a paywall. It’s too important. Isn’t that refreshing? All you have to do is register by emailing:

edmundmazza@gmail.com

People committed to unrepentant mortal sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion, because that would be a sacrilege, and another mortal sin.  If you commit a mortal sin, you need to repent, receive sacramental confession/absolution, and have a firm purpose of amendment. If any of those things are missing, you remain in mortal sin. A third grader understands this.

When was the moment you realized Bergoglio was an antipope? For me, it was October 7th, 2016. Amoris Laetitia had been published six months earlier, and I fought it in gory detail on these pages, right down to the footnotes. In the infamous Chapter Eight, it was promulgated that couples living in unrepentant mortal sin – fornicators and adulterers with no purpose of amendment at all – could receive valid sacramental confession and the Eucharist. There were all sorts of denials, that it didn’t really say that, or that Bergoglio couldn’t have known about it, etc. Bullshit.

Then on October 7th, Feast of Our Lady of Victory of the Rosary, the letter from the Argentine bishops proposing the aforementioned understanding of the passage, was confirmed in the affirmative by Bergoglio and published as a magisterial act in the AAS. This is something that the Petrine Promises assure us is impossible for a true pope. I knew in this moment Bergoglio was an antipope, and began my research into how it came to be. It would take me another nine months to run it to ground, and publicly state my findings.

So enjoy the following excerpt that went down last week. I remember in 2016 being incredulous that no prelate would call this out — that no true pope could do these things, being supernaturally protected from doing so. Well here we are seven years later, the good Cardinal (who was head of CDF in 2016) still doesn’t seem to understand, and continues to grovel to invalid/illegitimate authority.

Reportage via LIFESITENEWS. >>>

In the babel of the interpretations of Amoris laetitia, in fact, the bishops of the Buenos Aires region had also said their piece, in favor of Communion for divorced and “remarried” people, in a letter to their priests dated September 5, 2016, to which Francis had responded enthusiastically the same day with his letter of approval:

El escrito es muy bueno y explícita cabalmente el sentido del capítulo VIII de ‘Amoris laetitia.’ No hay otras interpretaciones. Y estoy seguro de que hará mucho bien.

[The text is very good and thoroughly explains the sense of chapter VIII of ‘Amoris laetitia.’ There are no other interpretations. And I am sure it will do much good.]

There remained to be determined what authority for the worldwide Church might be borne by a private letter from Jorge Mario Bergoglio to the secretary of the bishops of the Buenos Aires region.

And this was seen to with the reprinting of both letters, on October 7, in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis, the official organ of the Holy See, accompanied by a “rescriptum” that promoted them to “magisterium authenticum.”

It was on this “rescriptum” that Cardinal Fernández, in responding to Duka’s doubts last September 25, relied to validate the magisterial authority of the approval given by Pope Francis to communion for the divorced and remarried. With a whole slew of further guidelines regarding its implementation.

But now he comes up against the complete disagreement of Cardinal Müller, his predecessor as head of the same dicastery, who in this letter to his friend Cardinal Duka dismantles point by point the arguments of Fernández, the Pope’s approval for which is also expressed poorly – Müller points out – affixed as it is “with a simple dated signature at the bottom of the page,” instead of with the customary canonical formulas.

From Müller:

Your Eminence, dear brother Dominik Cardinal Duka,

I have read with great interest the response of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) to your “dubia” on the Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation “Amoris Laetitia” (“Risposta a una serie di domande,” hereafter “Risposta”) and I would like to share my assessment with you.

One of the doubts you presented to the DDF concerns the interpretation of “Amoris Laetitia” found in a letter of the Bishops of the Buenos Aires Region dated September 5, 2016, which allows access to the sacraments of Confession and of the Eucharist to divorced persons who have entered into a second civil union, even when they continue to behave as husband and wife with no intention of changing their lives. The “Risposta” affirms that this text of Buenos Aires belongs to the ordinary papal magisterium, having been approved by the Pope himself. In fact, Francis has affirmed that the interpretation offered by the bishops of Buenos Aires is the only possible interpretation of “Amoris Laetitia.” Consequently, the “Risposta” indicates that the text of Buenos Aires, like other texts of the ordinary Magisterium of the Pope, must be given a religious submission of mind and will (cf. “Lumen Gentium” 25:1).

The full text of Cardinal Müller’s letter can be found here.

Three years ago I was among the first – and certainly the first Bishop – to denounce pandemic and vaccination fraud. Expressed with arguments that today emerge as true and well-founded are the critical issues and immorality of an experimental gene treatment, which aborted fetuses… https://t.co/hQFTYWlsPC

— Arcivescovo Carlo Maria Viganò (@CarloMVigano) October 23, 2023

But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema. -Gal 1:8

I mean, talk about obliterating three of the four Marks of the True Church in one tweet.

UPDATE 13:48MST: The Germans finish the job, wiping out the Fourth Mark:

I was not quite clear on what Bishop Overbeck meant in his response, so as soon as the briefing had ended, I went up to him & twice asked explicitly if he meant we need to set aside Apostolic Tradition—and twice he said “yes”, that this is what he meant. (4/4) #SynodonSynodality

— Diane Montagna (@dianemontagna) October 21, 2023

https://x.com/dianemontagna/status/1715800335233552419?s=46&t=QVRahZjR0Wj-QYIIJUNMOA

Across the transom. I don’t know who this person is, the blog appears to be anon, so I have no way of contacting him. But I’m pasting it here with the link at the end. -nvp

False Pope Creating a False Church because Good Catholics Will Not Stop Him

 Amici,

Whatever Jorge Mario Bergoglio is creating in Rome via his “Synod”, now extended apparently a number of years (we’ll never get rid of it! You KNOW it is “Vatican III”) – whatever it is, it is not the Catholic Church.

How obvious is this? Just reading, even skimming, some of the stuff going on at that Synod strikes me as completely alien to EVERYTHING Catholic. So, clearly, the false pope is creating a false Church.

Can we be remotely surprised?

Yes, Bergoglio is creating a false Church via his “Synod on Synodality”. And good men like Cardinals Burke, Müller, bishops such as Bishop Athanasius Schneider, and of course a host of Conservative Catholics (Fr. Gerald Murray and Robert Royal are exemplars) and Trad Catholics – too numerous to count, but Professor Peter Kwasniewski is an excellent example, are letting him do it.

They’re letting Bergoglio get away with it because they insist he is a valid pope, and actually occupies the cathedra of St. Peter. As I’ve written a number of times, Bergoglio is painfully obviously not a pope, and has never acted like one, so therefore insisting he is a valid pope leads inevitably to cognitive dissonance. You’ll go cross-eyed insisting this fool – and no, I’m not very nice to “Bergi” – is an actual pope. In fact, you’ll lose your faith if you insist on maintaining the charade.

Video Tells All

Ever see see that video of Bergoglio nine years ago walking along a hallway, spying two young altar servers, one with his hands in the classic prayer position? Bergoglio says something, then stops, and physically pulls the boy’s hands apart, saying “Are your hands bound together? Seems like they’re stuck.” That little scene, right there, affirmed my growing suspicions and I’ve never believed he was pope after that. (If I ever really believed it before.)

He wears a diabolical pectoral cross, too, as I’ve written here.  And the man has consistently proven he is not a pope, nor a Catholic, and not even a Christian. Yet all these good men noted above insist he is actually pope and must be “resisted”. Don’t they comprehend doing that is driving a stake through the heart of the papacy? If it survives Bergoglio’s wrecking ball at all, it will be stunted, shackled, and marginalized. Thanks to them.

And so will the Church.

Now, Ann Barnardt and her friends insist Benedict XVI did not validly resign in the first place. I think they make excellent arguments. Archbishop Viganò makes the superb argument that Bergoglio accepted his election without intending to serve as pope’s are supposed to; it would be like a marriage being declared invalid because one of the partners had no intention of keeping any of his vows in the first place. Both these arguments are splendid, indeed, but for me, I think it is simply, horrifically blatant that there’s nothing papal about this lout. So, GET HIM OUT! And any argument that can effect that is a most excellent argument, indeed!

Otherwise, all these well-meaning folk will do as much damage to Holy Mother Church as Bergoglio himself, and ALL his perverted peeps, are doing.

          AnP

https://corvinescatholiccorner.blogspot.com/2023/10/whatever-jorge-mario-bergoglio-is.html?m=1