All Hallows Eve: “In the midst of the elders, a Lamb standing as it were slain”

The Vigil of All Saints had been a proper vigil with its own Mass and Office since the eighth century, right up until it got canceled in 1957. It was canceled and not replaced with anything. Feria. Because when something works well for 1200 years, you should definitely get rid of it.

From my 1948 hand missal:

“The preparing by a solemn vigil for the celebration of All Saints Day probably dates from the eighth century, when November 1 was fixed for the celebration of the feast. The fast on this vigil is of universal observance. As on other vigils, Holy Mass is celebrated in purple vestments, and the liturgy throughout is of a penitential character. Let our life here on earth be lived by us with the help of God’s grace, as a preparation for an eternity happy with God in His Heavenly home.”

Collect: O Lord, our God, multiply Thy graces upon us, and grant that joy may follow in the holy praise of those whose glorious festival we anticipate.

Epistle (Apoc. 5:6-12): In those days, behold I, John, saw in the midst of the throne and of the four living creatures, and in the midst of the elders, a Lamb standing as it were slain, having seven horns and seven eyes: which are the seven Spirits of God, sent forth into all the earth. And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat on the throne. And when he had opened the book, the four living creatures, and the four and twenty ancients fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints: And they sung a new canticle, saying: Thou art worthy, O Lord, to take the book, and to open the seals thereof; because thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God, in thy blood, out of every tribe, and tongue, and people, and nation. And hast made us to our God a kingdom and priests, and we shall reign on the earth. And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round about the throne, and the living creatures, and the ancients; and the number of them was thousands of thousands, saying with a loud voice, ‘The Lamb that was slain is worthy to receive power, and divinity, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and benediction.’

Amen! Blesssed All Hallows Eve.

ENOUGH of the Bergoglian Antipapacy… watch this video and share the evidence!

I’ve finally had the time to complete watching the Part 3 video from Miss B. Don’t be put off by the 2:40:00 length – consume it at 1.5x speed, and it goes by really fast because the content is captivating. It is easily the best of the three videos she has done, and at first I couldn’t quite put my finger on why. After all, could there really be anything new? Wouldn’t this just be rehashing all the old talking points? Why is it so captivating?

What it boils down to is her approach and delivery. It comes off like a courtroom drama, where Benedict’s invalid half-resignation is on trial, and the prosecution keeps introducing uppercuts and haymaker hooks as the defendant is on the ropes. It’s methodical. She drives home the point with page after page of Benedict’s own words and deeds. No mind-reading is necessary. No gnostic decoder ring is needed. Benedict tried to resign only the active governance of the papacy, delegating the governance to his “successor,” while Benedict himself retained the passive role of prayer and suffering. Since this is Substantial Error, the entire resignation was invalid per Canon 188, and Benedict remained the only pope until his death Dec 31, 2022.

As you examine the evidence, keep in mind the following axiom: Pope Benedict, in his act of resignation, needed to fully assent with his will to the total renunciation of the papacy in toto in order for it to be valid. If you find evidence, spoken, written, and visual evidence, that he did NOT intend to fully resign, that, on the contrary, he quite obviously intended to remain in some way papal, well then you have your answer. SUBSTANTIAL ERROR. -nvp

Bergoglian Antipapacy video Part 3: ENOUGH


Two hours and forty minutes and I feel like I left so much out that I reserve the right to drop a Part 3.5 video.

Remember to pray the Matthew 17:20 Intention:

1. That Bergoglio be publicly recognized and removed as Antipope and the whole Antipapacy be publicly declared null

2. That Pope Benedict Ratzinger be publicly recognized as the one and only living Pope from April of ARSH 2005 until his death on December 31, ARSH 2022, and for the Petrine See in se

3. That Antipope Bergoglio repent, revert to Catholicism, do penance and die in the state of grace in the fullness of time, and someday achieve the Beatific Vision

4. For the repose of the soul of Pope Benedict Ratzinger

St. Catherine of Siena, pray for us, for the Holy Catholic Church outside of which there is no salvation, and for the Petrine See, vacant these 296 days and counting.

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on us.

The Video

The Rumble-based video is embedded on this page but sharing a link to that on social media doesn’t work very well as Rumble has been shadow-banned in some places and might get banned altogether in others (like the E.U.), so Supernerd has posted the video to some other platforms as well, platforms where sharing is much easier and that aren’t as shadow-banned (but, admittedly, could get censored):



Licensing: this video is licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND license which, in a nutshell, means you need to attribute authorship (linking back to this web page is best), not sell it or post it to monetized channels, and don’t make any derivative works from it (like an edit which is in substantial error with the actual thesis of this video). Supernerd is going to post the final 4.17 GB video and link it here for those who want to share and post it elsewhere; let us know and we’ll add links to additional locations where the video has been shared:


“The Lamb of God from the throne of His Cross”


“Christ is fully the spiritual King of all mankind, for He is the giver of life, the maker of law, the supreme judge and ruling authority, in the minds and wills and hearts of human beings. He is King of mankind by natural right, because He is the divine maker and sustainer of the universe and He took human nature unto His divine Person. He is King by acquired right, because He redeemed mankind by the sacrifice of His body and blood. The Lamb of God from the throne of His Cross, reunited all peoples. Although formerly separated by sin, they became one kingdom, one family, and prospective members of one Mystical Body.”

Our Lady of Champion: “Go and fear nothing, I will help you.”

h/t to Father Nix, additional links at the end.

Our Lady of Champion is an approved Marian apparition, the Blessed Virgin Mary having appeared in October 1859 to a 28 year old Belgian immigrant at Champion, Wisconsin, near Green Bay. The story is as follows.

Adele Brise (Brice) was born in Belgium to Lambert and Catherine Brise on January 30, 1831.  She and some companions made a vow to the Blessed Virgin at an early age to become religious sisters.  However, her parents soon moved the family to a new Catholic community in Wisconsin, founded by Belgian settlers.  One day as she was walking through the forest,  Adele saw a lady dressed in white, standing between two trees believed to be a maple and hemlock. (If you have never “walked through the forest” in this part of the world, especially Door County, you need to put it on your bucket list. Some of the trees are over a thousand years old. The smell alone is captivating. Go September if you can. -nvp)

The account continues:

A few days later, on what is believed to be Sunday, October 9, 1859, Adele walked to Mass with her sister and a friend. The Church was 10 miles away from home, but Adele made the journey every Sunday, no matter the weather. Along the same path, Adele saw the mysterious lady standing in the same spot between the two trees. However, Adele being the only one to see her, she and her companions continued their journey to Mass.

After Mass, Adele spoke to her parish priest, and he instructed her that if the lady appeared to her again to ask the question, “In God’s name, who are you and what do you want of me?”

On her journey home, Adele saw the lady for the third time. As she and her companions approached the hallowed spot, Adele could see the beautiful lady, clothed in dazzling white, with a yellow sash around her waist. Her dress fell to her feet in graceful folds. She had a crown of stars around her head, and her long golden wavy hair fell loosely over her shoulders. The lady had such a heavenly light around her that Adele could hardly look at her face. Overcome by the light, Adele fell to her knees and said, “In God’s name, who are you, and what do you want of me?”

The lady replied, “I am the Queen of Heaven who prays for the conversion of sinners, and I wish you to do the same. You received Holy Communion this morning and that is well. But you must do more. Make a general confession and offer Communion for the conversion of sinners. If they do not convert and do penance, my Son will be obliged to punish them.”

Adele’s companions, unable to see Our Lady asked, “Adele, who is it? Why can’t we see her as you do?”

“Kneel,” said Adele, “the Lady says she is the Queen of Heaven.”

The Blessed Lady gazed kindly upon them, saying, “Blessed are they that believe without seeing.” Then, looking toward Adele, the Queen of Heaven asked, “What are you doing here in idleness while your companions are working in the vineyard of my Son?”

“What more can I do, dear Lady?” asked Adele, weeping.

“Gather the children in this wild country and teach them what they should know for salvation.”

“But how shall I teach them who know so little myself?” Adele said.

“Teach them,” replied her radiant visitor, “their catechism, how to sign themselves with the sign of the Cross, and how to approach the sacraments; that is what I wish you to do. Go and fear nothing, I will help you.”

Adele then gave herself tirelessly to catechesis and eventually became a nun.

Full post, including America’s failed mission:

Site of the shrine in Wisconsin, with further details including the massive fire of 1871 and the miraculous protection of the shrine, sisters, liveststock:


Saint Padre Pio: “Satan will be introduced into the bosom of the Church, and will come to rule a false church”

Our Lady of Fatima came to warn us what needed to be done, and she was ignored. Russia was never properly consecrated to her Immaculate Heart by a true pope in union with all the bishops. Seven different popes disobeyed our Blessed Mother. How in the world does that happen? Our Lady of LaSalette warned us. Our Lady of Akita warned us. If you haven’t studied these messages, you really need to. Take a look around, and consider the fate we truly deserve.

Have you ever wondered, why did they lie when purportedly releasing the Third Secret in the year 2000? Think about this. JPII, via Ratzinger and Sodano, read out an explanation that wasn’t remotely plausible. What was the motive? Why not just say nothing? Why deploy an obvious deception, knowing you’d be caught, when you could have made up something much more convincing?

While we may not have the complete Third Secret of Fatima, we know enough to properly inform our consciences.  Which means we are then morally bound to make prudential judgments. We have an obvious, obvious antipope squatting on the chair. We are about to have a synodal antichurch spewing heresy in all directions. WWIII may have begun last night, with the US bombing of Iranian Guard positions in Syria. Go to Confession and do what you can to warn others. Act, and God will act.

Here is a fantastic clip from Dr. Mazza’s interview on the Joe McClane show yesterday. Listen and learn:

Blockbuster conference “Is the Pope Catholic?” coming December 9th, sign up for FREE today!

Yes, it is FREE. Because truth shouldn’t be hidden behind a paywall. It’s too important. Isn’t that refreshing? All you have to do is register by emailing:

“Is the Pope Catholic?”

A Conference Seeking the Truth about the “Two Popes”

Saturday December 9, 2023


His Excellency Archbishop Carlo Vigano

Fr. James Altman

Fr. Paul Kramer

Dr. Ed Mazza

Ann Barnhardt

Elizabeth Yore

To REGISTER please email:

On February 11, 2013, two tremendous bolts of lightening struck the Dome of St. Peter’s Basilica, directly above the Tomb of the Apostle–the same day Pope Benedict announced his stunning Declaratio! Stranger still, in the Vatican, for the next decade, two men wore the signature white cassock, two men bestowed their own personal Apostolic Blessings on the faithful and two men were formally addressed as “His Holiness.” One resided in seclusion and self-imposed silence, in prayer and meditation at the Mater Ecclesiae Monastery in the Vatican Gardens. The other still resides in the Domus Sanctae Marthae, the Vatican hotel, which was built to house visiting cardinals. (Curiously, the Papal Apartments located in the Apostolic Palace since the 17th Century remain uninhabited.) The unexpected renunciation of Benedict and his perplexing presence in the Vatican as “Pope Emeritus” still confounds Catholics as much as–in some sense, even more than–the globalism and heterodoxy of the putative pope, Francis.

Now that the new “Synodal” Church is being foisted upon us, it’s time to seek the truth about the “two Popes.” It’s time for the silent majority to speak out. As conference speaker, His Excellency Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano has prophetically intoned:

Among the titles of the Roman Pontiff recurs, along with
Christi Vicarius, that of Servus servorum Dei [“Servant of the
servants of God”]. While the former has been disdainfully
rejected by Bergoglio, his choice to retain the latter sounds
like a provocation, as evidenced by his words and deeds.
The day will come when the Presuli of the Church will be
asked to clarify what intrigues and what conspiracies could
have led to the Throne him who acts as “Servant of Satan’s
servants,” and why they have fearfully witnessed his
intemperances or made themselves accomplices of this
proud heretical tyrant. Let those who know and who keep
silent out of false prudence tremble: by their silence they do
not protect the honor of the Holy Church, nor do they
preserve the simple ones from scandal. On the contrary,
they plunge the Bride of the Lamb into ignominy and
humiliation, and turn the faithful away from the Ark of
salvation at the very moment of the Flood.

Various speakers at “Is the Pope Catholic?” Conference will consider the possibility of 1) the invalidity of Pope Benedict’s resignation, or 2) the invalidity of Bergoglio’s acceptance of the Papacy, or 3) Bergoglio’s loss of office due to public material (if not formal) heresy.

Code of Canon Law of the Catholic Church, Canon 748 §1. “All persons are bound to seek the truth in those things which regard God and his Church…are bound by the obligation…of embracing and observing the truth which they have come to know.”

Fr. Franz Wernz and Fr. Pedro Vidal’s Ius Canonicum, an eight-volume work published in 1943, which is perhaps the most highly respected commentary on the 1917 Code of Canon Law, states:

“Finally they cannot be numbered among the schismatics, who refuse to obey the Roman Pontiff because they consider his person to be suspect or doubtfully elected on account of rumors in circulation.”

Cardinal Müller helpfully reminds us that a true pope cannot promulgate error in faith or morals

People committed to unrepentant mortal sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion, because that would be a sacrilege, and another mortal sin.  If you commit a mortal sin, you need to repent, receive sacramental confession/absolution, and have a firm purpose of amendment. If any of those things are missing, you remain in mortal sin. A third grader understands this.

When was the moment you realized Bergoglio was an antipope? For me, it was October 7th, 2016. Amoris Laetitia had been published six months earlier, and I fought it in gory detail on these pages, right down to the footnotes. In the infamous Chapter Eight, it was promulgated that couples living in unrepentant mortal sin – fornicators and adulterers with no purpose of amendment at all – could receive valid sacramental confession and the Eucharist. There were all sorts of denials, that it didn’t really say that, or that Bergoglio couldn’t have known about it, etc. Bullshit.

Then on October 7th, Feast of Our Lady of Victory of the Rosary, the letter from the Argentine bishops proposing the aforementioned understanding of the passage, was confirmed in the affirmative by Bergoglio and published as a magisterial act in the AAS. This is something that the Petrine Promises assure us is impossible for a true pope. I knew in this moment Bergoglio was an antipope, and began my research into how it came to be. It would take me another nine months to run it to ground, and publicly state my findings.

So enjoy the following excerpt that went down last week. I remember in 2016 being incredulous that no prelate would call this out — that no true pope could do these things, being supernaturally protected from doing so. Well here we are seven years later, the good Cardinal (who was head of CDF in 2016) still doesn’t seem to understand, and continues to grovel to invalid/illegitimate authority.

Reportage via LIFESITENEWS. >>>

In the babel of the interpretations of Amoris laetitia, in fact, the bishops of the Buenos Aires region had also said their piece, in favor of Communion for divorced and “remarried” people, in a letter to their priests dated September 5, 2016, to which Francis had responded enthusiastically the same day with his letter of approval:

El escrito es muy bueno y explícita cabalmente el sentido del capítulo VIII de ‘Amoris laetitia.’ No hay otras interpretaciones. Y estoy seguro de que hará mucho bien.

[The text is very good and thoroughly explains the sense of chapter VIII of ‘Amoris laetitia.’ There are no other interpretations. And I am sure it will do much good.]

There remained to be determined what authority for the worldwide Church might be borne by a private letter from Jorge Mario Bergoglio to the secretary of the bishops of the Buenos Aires region.

And this was seen to with the reprinting of both letters, on October 7, in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis, the official organ of the Holy See, accompanied by a “rescriptum” that promoted them to “magisterium authenticum.”

It was on this “rescriptum” that Cardinal Fernández, in responding to Duka’s doubts last September 25, relied to validate the magisterial authority of the approval given by Pope Francis to communion for the divorced and remarried. With a whole slew of further guidelines regarding its implementation.

But now he comes up against the complete disagreement of Cardinal Müller, his predecessor as head of the same dicastery, who in this letter to his friend Cardinal Duka dismantles point by point the arguments of Fernández, the Pope’s approval for which is also expressed poorly – Müller points out – affixed as it is “with a simple dated signature at the bottom of the page,” instead of with the customary canonical formulas.

From Müller:

Your Eminence, dear brother Dominik Cardinal Duka,

I have read with great interest the response of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) to your “dubia” on the Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation “Amoris Laetitia” (“Risposta a una serie di domande,” hereafter “Risposta”) and I would like to share my assessment with you.

One of the doubts you presented to the DDF concerns the interpretation of “Amoris Laetitia” found in a letter of the Bishops of the Buenos Aires Region dated September 5, 2016, which allows access to the sacraments of Confession and of the Eucharist to divorced persons who have entered into a second civil union, even when they continue to behave as husband and wife with no intention of changing their lives. The “Risposta” affirms that this text of Buenos Aires belongs to the ordinary papal magisterium, having been approved by the Pope himself. In fact, Francis has affirmed that the interpretation offered by the bishops of Buenos Aires is the only possible interpretation of “Amoris Laetitia.” Consequently, the “Risposta” indicates that the text of Buenos Aires, like other texts of the ordinary Magisterium of the Pope, must be given a religious submission of mind and will (cf. “Lumen Gentium” 25:1).

The full text of Cardinal Müller’s letter can be found here.

Archbishop Vigano with quite the tweet

Three years ago I was among the first – and certainly the first Bishop – to denounce pandemic and vaccination fraud. Expressed with arguments that today emerge as true and well-founded are the critical issues and immorality of an experimental gene treatment, which aborted fetuses were and are used to produce. I also wrote two open letters to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which remain unanswered. There were those in conservative circles who went so far as to attack me personally and resorted to the unproven and clearly false statements of a doctor who worked with her husband for BigPharma. I expressed my dismay at the silence of the bishops, priests, and parish pastors, of many religious workers involved in hospitals, and at the servile zeal with which the Catholic Hierarchy conformed to the crazy and criminal health regulations and Bergoglio’s promotion of the serum. I was publicly insulted on television and in the media, while my brother bishops were silent. Faced with a crime against humanity that has continued to take place before our eyes for three years with the approval and encouragement of Bergoglio, I would have thought that many Pastors would have found the courage to raise their voices and join in my denunciation of the plan of world depopulation implemented by the Word Economic Forum, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the WHO, and the UN, while the funds of these criminals were also given to the Vatican, transforming Bergoglio into a vaccine salesman and a supporter of climate fraud, which has now become “magisterium” with Laudate Deum and with the “Amazonian and synodal church.” Nemo propheta in sua patria. But if today some priests surrender to the evidence and ask Catholic journalists to tell the truth about the adverse effects, I wonder with what serenity they have so far silenced their conscience, and if their silence and fearful silence – like that of the doctors, police forces, magistrates, teachers and governors – has not turned into a timid protest today just because they see the showdown approaching and fear for their own reputation more than for the health of the billions of people subjected to the inoculation of a product that was known from the beginning to be dangerous and even lethal. Their silence on the pandemic fraud is identical to that on the apostasy of the Catholic Hierarchy. And the moral responsibility that weighs on them will remain as an indelible stain for which they will have to answer to God, to men, and to History.


If anyone should say that Truth is determined by “local cultures and contexts,” let him be anathema

But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema. -Gal 1:8

I mean, talk about obliterating three of the four Marks of the True Church in one tweet.

UPDATE 13:48MST: The Germans finish the job, wiping out the Fourth Mark:

“False Pope Creating a False Church because Good Catholics Will Not Stop Him”

Across the transom. I don’t know who this person is, the blog appears to be anon, so I have no way of contacting him. But I’m pasting it here with the link at the end. -nvp

False Pope Creating a False Church because Good Catholics Will Not Stop Him


Whatever Jorge Mario Bergoglio is creating in Rome via his “Synod”, now extended apparently a number of years (we’ll never get rid of it! You KNOW it is “Vatican III”) – whatever it is, it is not the Catholic Church.
How obvious is this? Just reading, even skimming, some of the stuff going on at that Synod strikes me as completely alien to EVERYTHING Catholic. So, clearly, the false pope is creating a false Church.
Can we be remotely surprised?
Yes, Bergoglio is creating a false Church via his “Synod on Synodality”. And good men like Cardinals Burke, Müller, bishops such as Bishop Athanasius Schneider, and of course a host of Conservative Catholics (Fr. Gerald Murray and Robert Royal are exemplars) and Trad Catholics – too numerous to count, but Professor Peter Kwasniewski is an excellent example, are letting him do it.
They’re letting Bergoglio get away with it because they insist he is a valid pope, and actually occupies the cathedra of St. Peter. As I’ve written a number of times, Bergoglio is painfully obviously not a pope, and has never acted like one, so therefore insisting he is a valid pope leads inevitably to cognitive dissonance. You’ll go cross-eyed insisting this fool – and no, I’m not very nice to “Bergi” – is an actual pope. In fact, you’ll lose your faith if you insist on maintaining the charade.
Video Tells All
Ever see see that video of Bergoglio nine years ago walking along a hallway, spying two young altar servers, one with his hands in the classic prayer position? Bergoglio says something, then stops, and physically pulls the boy’s hands apart, saying “Are your hands bound together? Seems like they’re stuck.” That little scene, right there, affirmed my growing suspicions and I’ve never believed he was pope after that. (If I ever really believed it before.)
He wears a diabolical pectoral cross, too, as I’ve written here.  And the man has consistently proven he is not a pope, nor a Catholic, and not even a Christian. Yet all these good men noted above insist he is actually pope and must be “resisted”. Don’t they comprehend doing that is driving a stake through the heart of the papacy? If it survives Bergoglio’s wrecking ball at all, it will be stunted, shackled, and marginalized. Thanks to them.
And so will the Church.
Now, Ann Barnardt and her friends insist Benedict XVI did not validly resign in the first place. I think they make excellent arguments. Archbishop Viganò makes the superb argument that Bergoglio accepted his election without intending to serve as pope’s are supposed to; it would be like a marriage being declared invalid because one of the partners had no intention of keeping any of his vows in the first place. Both these arguments are splendid, indeed, but for me, I think it is simply, horrifically blatant that there’s nothing papal about this lout. So, GET HIM OUT! And any argument that can effect that is a most excellent argument, indeed!
Otherwise, all these well-meaning folk will do as much damage to Holy Mother Church as Bergoglio himself, and ALL his perverted peeps, are doing.