Never forget, God is in charge. He has foreseen all of this, and he is not handcuffed in any way. He desires that men of good will act.
“Act, and God will act.”
Never forget, God is in charge. He has foreseen all of this, and he is not handcuffed in any way. He desires that men of good will act.
“Act, and God will act.”
I have been struggling with the truth of what’s been happening since Covid hit. The Trusted News Initiative created massive censorship of scientific research that essentially prevented our mainstream media from doing their job. Despite that however, there have been numerous opportunities for those in the media to speak out…yet none of them have done so. How do you feel that the FDA is doing everything in its power right now to prevent the Covid vaccine clinical trial data from seeing the light of day. Does that sound reasonable to any of you? What possible motivation could they have other than to conceal the evidence? The FDA wants to take 75 years to slowly release the material rather than the 8 months that a Federal judge determined was reasonable. The FDA is challenging that decision. Keep in mind that our FDA received all the documents from Pfizer over a year ago, so they have it easily available and took 104 days to “carefully” review all the clinical trial data. Why are they unable to send along that material to the highly respected, international scientists and researchers who voiced concerns about the safety of the vaccines, given the high VAERS reports and experiences from their practicing colleagues and thus were seeking an independent review of the material? I can’t even imagine that there is any legitimate case to be made to wait until everyone is dead and gone and the information is no longer relevant. Where is mainstream media now?
Where is mainstream media when one of the most respected peer reviewed journals, the Lancet, voiced concerns about the misinformation that our public health agencies are spewing.
“In the USA and Germany, high-level officials have used the term pandemic of the unvaccinated, suggesting that people who have been vaccinated are not relevant in the epidemiology of COVID-19. Officials’ use of this phrase might have encouraged one scientist to claim that “the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated for COVID-19”.
“People who are vaccinated have a lower risk of severe disease but are still a relevant part of the pandemic. It is therefore wrong and dangerous to speak of a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Historically, both the USA and Germany have engendered negative experiences by stigmatising parts of the population for their skin colour or religion. I call on high-level officials and scientists to stop the inappropriate stigmatisation of unvaccinated people, who include our patients, colleagues, and other fellow citizens, and to put extra effort into bringing society together.”
Where were our democratic members of Congress when a Senate hearing, which was called a Second Opinion on Covid, was taking place? A gathering of leading physicians and researchers, even the creator of the mRNA technology, shared their experience with early treatment options and the mountain of scientific research on early treatment interventions, that have been ignored? ALL democrats chose to avoid this critical 5 hour presentation because of who orchestrated it. Senator Ron Johnson is not someone who garners respect from the Democrats, but that in no way should have disqualified the credibility of the invited speakers as each has a resume that clearly proves their scientific achievements and for others, their decades of experience treating critical care patients and more specifically their Covid early treatment patients over the last one and half years. Are we back in high school, or should I say middle school, where an entire group of children could be ignored or mistreated because someone didn’t like one of the kids in the group? Why was noone interested in hearing from highly credible and respected authorities who have NO conflicts of interest, which cannot be said about our public health agencies? Is every democratic senator so afraid of hearing something that is inconsistent with what is being stated by our public health authorities and mainstream media or are they afraid of making their donors unhappy? Shame on all 50 of them. Fortunately there was a dedicated attorney at the roundtable panel who was able to get Covid documents directly from the DOD, with a FOIA request, which clearly paints an alternative reality. I encourage you to go to page 12 and see the glaring evidence clearly- as of this past August, the majority of hospitalized seniors were fully vaccinated.
Father Kramer, late of the Fatima Center and foremost expert on the topic, has been nuking the site from orbit for several years now. His upcoming book, “On the True and the False Pope” can be pre-ordered here: https://www.sjmfatimacrusade.com/father-paul-kramer-book
Father Kramer cites the Gradualism with which the Modernists have transformed the institutional Church into the anti-church, with Antipope Bergoglio now mashing the throttle. He knew Malachi Martin, and likely knows the full content of the Third Secret. He believes that the ultimate cleaving will be Bergoglio issuing liturgical orders which will invalidate the Holy Sacrifice of the Novus Ordo, while at the same time issuing a total ban on the Traditional Latin Mass. If you haven’t prepared yourself for this, you don’t have much time left. Have you noticed all the renewed talk of newness? God of surprises? No firm truth, no fixed positions? You don’t know Jesus, only I know Jesus, okay?
Here is a link to Fr. Kramer’s sermon from last Sunday, h/t Tony La Rosa. He takes a little time to build up, the first ten minutes or so, but stick with it. The last 20 minutes are pure gold. Click the menu to change the playback speed:
And I will leave you with this:
January 28, 2022 by Tony La Rosa
Dear Catholic Resistance, please get out of your material schism. Accept Benedict XVI as the true pope because that he is.
The above is a comment from Fr. Paul Kramer dated January 28, 2022 on this post:
This video has it all. The truth about ivermectin, the urgency of early treatment, the importance of heavy steroids, doctors cancelled for success rates, hundreds of thousands of needless deaths, hospitals withholding treatment as patients die, vaxx injured patients with PCPs who won’t see them because that would be admitting there are vaxx injuries. It’s all here, folks. May God bless Senator Johnson.
Works great at 1.5x speed, so 25 minute investment. Ignore the gushing over mAbs.. those have thankfully been canceled for now, and their use of fetal parts in production is horrific. More on that later.
0:05 Sen Ron Johnson (R-WI) introductions
1:02 How may in this room have experienced professional repercussions? (every hand goes up)
2:11 My obese brother was headed to the ER, I told him to go to pharmacy instead, I called in the meds which shall not be named, he improved in less than six hours.
3:55 Dr Kory: I just want to point out that all of these failed disastrous policies were literally written by the pharmaceutical companies. Ivermectin has been shown to solve the pandemic around the world.
5:05 Dr Urser: I have treated over 1600 patients who were languishing at home because the PCP would not treat them. It’s absolutely absurd.
5:55 My dad died on Friday because we took him to the hospital and they would not administer any treatment, not even steroids to help his lungs. We had gotten his oxygen from 86 back up to 96, but no treatments!
6:55 Dr unkown: I’ve kept 2000 people out of the hospital with basic treatments.
8:45 “The question is, why have safe and effective treatments been withheld that could have saved possibly 500,000 lives?”
9:05 We have ignored foundational principles of medical ethics.
14:20 We know for a fact that natural immunity from having had covid is the only sterilizing immunity. There is not one case of a person with natural immunity passing on the virus. This isn’t true for the vaccinated who get infected. Why won’t the CDC admit this? Why is natural immunity being smeared?
15:05 Vaccinated carry a much larger viral load… the mandates are madness.
16:30 I’ve treated over 150,000 patients via myfreedoctor.com with a 99.99% survival rate. Early treatment works. Period.
19:45 Dr McCullough: Early treatment can’t be stressed enough. The only patients that I’ve had any serious problems did not get adequate treatment in the first 72 hours. These are the golden hours.
22:00 Q&A starts. Whoo boy. Just watch.
24:00 Dr Kory: Denial of natural immunity. Ask yourself why. This is corruption pure and simple. Profit over saving lives.
28:00 My hospital destroyed my medical career because my treatments were effective.
34:00 Dr McCullough: Myocarditis. Heart attacks. IN CHILDREN. Tens of thousands. And they are pressured or mandated to get this vaccine?
37:00 Dr Urso: You know, the fact that we have to have this hearing in the Senate is really something.
This article is from Joyce Kamen of the FLCCC, via Michael Capuzzo’s RESCUE substack. Link to the full piece at the end, which includes the transcript of the Zoom call in question. If you have any doubts about the corruption, deceit, and pure evil tied to this saga, you won’t after reading this.
By Joyce Kamen
In late 2020, Dr. Andrew Hill, a researcher at the University of Liverpool, was leading a team of researchers studying the drug ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of Covid-19. Their work was funded by UNITAID—a global health agency hosted by the World Health Organization (WHO) and supported (in large part) by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Unitaid’s main donors are France, the United Kingdom, Norway, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Brazil, Spain, the Republic of Korea, Chile, and Japan.
Dr. Hill and the research team produced their meta-analysis of ivermectin in January, 2021. The paper considered eighteen studies on the thirty-five-year-old drug—which has been safely used since 1987 to eradicate parasitic pandemics in low- and middle-income countries. The study concluded that the use of ivermectin resulted in reduced inflammation and a more rapid elimination of the Sars-Cov-2 virus from the body. Six of the eighteen trials showed that the risk of death from covid-19 was 75 percent lower in patients who had moderate to severe disease.
This was absolutely tremendous news. Hundreds of thousands of lives were about to be saved from the ravages of covid-19. Said Dr. Hill at the time to the Financial Times, “The purpose of this report is to forewarn people that this is coming: get prepared, get supplies, get ready to approve [ivermectin]. We need to be ready.”
When Dr. Hill made that statement—to gear up for the worldwide distribution of ivermectin—nearly 15,000 people were dying across the world every single day. Dr. Hill continued, “Vaccination is central to the response to the epidemic. But [ivermectin] might help reduce infection rates by making people less infectious and it might reduce death rates by treating the viral infection.”
But just one month later, Dr. Hill’s original, positive study conclusions on ivermectin quite literally fell off the rails. And so did the fortunes of the thousands who had no idea then that they were stuck on the tracks with a freight train barreling towards them—unable to get out of harm’s way because help had been hijacked.
Dr. Tess Lawrie, a physician, independent WHO researcher, and Director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, England, had heard that Dr. Hill was about to change his conclusions about ivermectin’s efficacy. So she called him on Zoom to find out why—and recorded the entire conversation.
During that Zoom call, Dr. Hill confessed to Dr. Lawrie that he was changing his study conclusions from positive to negative—because he was under pressure from his funding sponsors to do so.
Wait, what? His sponsors told him to change the study conclusions? NOT the data? What in the hell was going on?
Lawrie was furious.
We know that the studies considered in Hill’s soon-to-be-revised ivermectin paper did not change. But now the paper was going to conclude that because most of those studies in the meta-analysis contained “low-certainty evidence,” the positive results in the first iteration of the paper were now going to be characterized as being of “low certainty.”
According to Dr. Pierre Kory, President and Chief Medical Officer of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, “People need to understand that WHO treatment recommendation guidelines routinely include low, moderate, and high bias. They use all data to formulate their recommendations.”
The following are excerpts of Andrew Hill’s conversation with Tess Lawrie:
If you’re not subscribed (free) to Alex Berenson’s substack feed, you’re missing out.
Alex Berenson 7 hr ago
Scotland, Britain, Israel, and Denmark are four of the world’s most highly vaccinated countries. They all have 90 percent adult Covid vaccination rates and 60 percent adult boosters. Yet the vast majority of deaths are occurring in vaccinated people; serious cases are soaring; and infections are almost literally off the charts.
This is Covid vaccine failure at the most profound and basic level.
SCOTLAND: Covid death rates (RATES, not raw numbers) by vaccination status for the last four weeks. Death rates in vaccinated but unboosted people have been higher than rates in the unvaccinated each week.
Also, 87 percent of total deaths occurred in vaccinated people in the most recent week:
(Note: I have corrected the link. Also, the data in the British chart below is United Kingdom-wide and thus includes Scotland – some British readers asked me to make that clear.)
Covid deaths by vaccination status in the most recent four weeks (2,845 out of the 3,860 people for whom vaccine status could be determined were vaccinated – 74 percent):
Serious cases since Covid began (note cases peaked last January with the start of mass vaccinations and are expected to surpass that figure in the next few days):
Total infections since Covid began (this one speaks for itself):
Remember, these failures cannot be blamed on vaccine skepticism, or Tucker Carlson, or me. These countries are as close to fully vaccinated as it is possible to be.
If you think this is what you were promised a year ago – or six months ago, or even a month ago – I don’t know what to tell you. But the answer cannot be to do MORE of what has not worked.
Go check out the 452 comments: https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/vaccine-failure-in-two-charts-and/comments?
Highly, highly recommended. I believe NAC has helped me tremendously with inflammation against my life-long overactive immune system, and lessened the severity of my cytokine storm post-delta. Of course, I am taking it in combination with other things, so it might not be 100% the NAC, but I’m pretty sure it is a huge part of it. Thanks, Nurse Claire. Here is Dr. Mercola:
By Joseph Mercola January 25, 2022
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has a long history of use to help prevent liver damage, and more recently as a treatment for flu viruses. Now researchers have discovered its lifesaving value for COVID-19.
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a precursor to reduced glutathione, which appears to play a crucial role in COVID-19. According to an April 2020 literature analysis, glutathione deficiency may be associated with COVID-19 severity, leading the author to conclude that NAC may be useful both for its prevention and treatment.
NAC has a long history of use as a first-aid remedy for acetaminophen poisoning. It neutralizes the toxic effects of the drug by recharging glutathione, thereby preventing liver damage. But the idea that NAC can also be helpful against viral infections is not new. Previous studies have found it reduces viral replication of certain viruses, including the influenza virus.
In one such study, the number needed to treat (NNT) was 0.5, which means for every two people treated with NAC, one will be protected against symptomatic influenza. That’s significantly better than influenza vaccines, which have an NNV (number needed to vaccinate) of 71, meaning 71 people must be vaccinated to prevent a single case of confirmed influenza. It’s even better than vitamin D, which has an NNT of 33.
In the MedCram lecture above, pulmonologist Dr. Roger Seheult reviews the latest medical literature on NAC for COVID-19, starting with a paper published in the October 2020 issue of Clinical Immunology titled “Therapeutic Blockade of Inflammation in Severe COVID-19 Infection With Intravenous N-acetylcysteine.”
Previous research has shown NAC inhibits the expression of proinflammatory cytokines in cells infected with highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus. Proinflammatory cytokines also play a crucial role in COVID-19 severity…
By Liz Stark 3:19 PM ET Tue January 25, 2022
(CNN)The Biden administration is withdrawing its Covid-19 vaccination and testing regulation aimed at large businesses, following the Supreme Court’s decision to block the rule earlier this month.The US Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration said Tuesday it will be withdrawing the vaccination and testing emergency temporary standard for businesses with 100 or more employees, according to a statement on the agency’s website.“Although OSHA is withdrawing the vaccination and testing ETS as an enforceable emergency temporary standard, the agency is not withdrawing the ETS as a proposed rule. The agency is prioritizing its resources to focus on finalizing a permanent COVID-19 Healthcare Standard,” the statement read.
The withdrawal of the emergency temporary standard “does not affect the ETS’s continuing status as a proposed rule,” a US Department of Labor spokesperson told CNN in a statement.
Sometimes you’re presented with a data set that isn’t really news to you, you already sort of knew it at least instinctively, so the data itself doesn’t have shock value, so much as the way it is presented. It’s the old picture worth a thousand words, in a Cartesian plane. (Don’t get me started on Descartes… he ruined everything). Anyway, this is a quick read, and Dr. Briggs’ witty monologue makes the unpleasantness a little easier to take.
Never forget: The essence of Wokeness is unreality. To embrace unreality, God must first be rejected, because He is the Ultimate Reality. Wokeness is claiming that reality is whatever the individual says is reality. “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law,” church of Satan, are we seeing the clear connection here? Because it’s not just a connection; they are one.
The plot is from Ryan Burge. It is a succinct, though rough, summary of the similarity of metaphysical beliefs held by different birth cohorts in the once United States.
The edges of these cohorts are fuzzy. I prefer the definitions of Howe and Strauss in their The Fourth Turning. Their Gen Xers, for example, start in 1961. They make their cuts based on similarity of guiding thoughts of each generation and not strict demography.
That’s necessary, I think, because the guiding thoughts, the ideas believed or operated on by the majority in each cohort, is the point of having the divisions in the first place.
If Howe and Strauss are right about dates, that means the boundaries used by Burge are a tad off. But not so much it makes much difference to our purpose. Which is guessing when the Woke take over. We can accept being off by a few years.
Some 70% of Silents “know God really exists and…have no doubts about it.” This scarcely changes in time. The line looks downward sloping, but that’s somewhat exaggerated because it doesn’t take into account the uncertainty in each sample point (the entire populace wasn’t surveyed). But it’s close enough.
Even though only 70% of Silents held with something close to older orthodox Christianity, and with much associated with that, it doesn’t mean the remaining 30% didn’t share most of the same metaphysical beliefs, and ideas of Reality and morality. They did. There is always a distribution in beliefs, of course, and never unanimity, but bulk thought about fundamentals have a strong generational locus.
These beliefs are formed and joined necessarily by shared experiences, which naturally draw a people together.
Add all this together, and we have a generation. Again, it is a mistake to say all in a generation think the same, or nothing would ever change, but it is not a bad approximation for some applications.
Such as, again, predicting when the Woke are the majority.
If this chart is any guide, and belief, however loose, in the tenets of (older) Christianity and in non-subjective Reality is indeed a workable summary of shared beliefs, then Boomers and Gen Xers are close to the Silents, though with noticeable shifts at the edges. This accords with common experience.
Obviously, as the borders were opened and Diversity became “our” strength, and Perversion Is Ackshually Good sentiments exploded in the 60s, things changed. The Long March Through the Institutes began slow and at last turned into a rout, Christianity and its connections faded with the influx, and the culture changed key. And don’t forget, much was done in the name of the old ideas.
We can see on the chart just where the shift began. Millennials were taught badly, according to the lights of the old beliefs, by their parents, who were largely Gen Xers and some Boomers.
The trends accelerated for those in Gen Z. They are Woke. Millennials are semi-Woke, semi-Reality. Gen Z’s were birthed by late Gen Xers, but also by a lot of semi-Woke Millennials. The oddly named Generation Alpha—which Howe and Strauss call “Homeland”, as if they are the new generation—born starting around 2005-2010, are in schools now. And those schools are staffed almost wholly by the Woke, or those who fear resisting the Woke.
Who rules now? A handful of Silents (Hi, Nancy!), but mostly Boomers and some Gen Xers. Many complaints about Boomers are heard, but their aging grip on power is what is staving off the spiral into the hell of Full Wokeness.
Gen Xers hold many of the same beliefs as Boomers, particularly foundational metaphysical beliefs about Reality. This cohort is in their early 40s to about 60. They, too, hold a lot of power. Their power will increase as the Boomers fade away.
The oldest Millennials are just turning 40 or so, and so are just starting to gain real power.
The oldest Gen Zers will begin to turn 40 around the year 2030. By 2030, the very youngest Boomers will be in their 70s, which is no bar to hold power; however, most of the Boomers will be in their 80s or dead by then.
It will thus be up to the smaller cohort of Gen Xers to hold back the Woke Wall of Undead. Just like those sad folks trapped in the farmhouse in Night of the Living Dead. Spoiler alert: they didn’t make it.
All this together says that if nothing else happens—a huge enormous monstrous assumption!—then the Woke gain the prize around (go read his prediction for USA): https://wmbriggs.com/post/38857/
Any number of things can push this up, or back. “Events” would push it back. The attitudes of those now in power push it up.
Many Boomers in power, as greedy as ever and anxious to deny their fate, have turned into ravening liars. Take “Dr” Tom Frieden, born almost in 1961. Ex-chief of the CDC. He’s out saying “pregnant people“. But maybe he’s a Gen Xer. The year 1961 is on the edge in Howe and Strauss’s reckoning.
Anyway, you can easily bring to mind many Silents and Boomers in power who lip Woke (what is taken to be) dogma. We know they don’t mean it, but they do speak it, which encourages younger cohorts. Gen Xers do this more than Boomers, and Millennials even more.
This changes by country, of course. Canada will be earlier. Finland is almost there now. Et cetera…