So, what is the connection between humanized mice and monoclonal antibodies? Read on.
“Monoclonal” means these drugs have singular specificity… they only match up with the one antigen/protein they are targeting, and since they are fully human, produced from a mouse but containing no mouse parts, no risk of rejection whatsoever. But this also means there needs to be tons of new drugs, each treating one specific thing. Think of it as the opposite of a “broad spectrum antibiotic.”
In fact, there are over 500 different monoclonal antibodies either approved or investigational. You’re going to need a lot of mice for that, to say nothing of other all the other drugs that can now be tested on human immune systems. Remember, the humanized mice first have their own immune systems canceled, either genetically or by irradiation, then replaced with a fully human immune system, including the BLT, BLT-L mice built with parts from fresh, never frozen babies.
As an aside, in case this hasn’t occurred to you: While humanized mice with fully human immune systems are “perfect” for testing and producing medicines, their diabolical perfection also means they are ideal for testing things to judge their lethality in humans. Gain of Function research, anyone? If you are attempting to engineer a bio-weapon, these are the mice you want.
Okay. The following list includes mabs tested on various types of mice, but anything tested in the past 5-6 years is almost certainly done with the fully human variety. First column is drug name, second column is the brand name. The nomenclature works as follows: All drugs with names ending in “umab” were developed and produced with fully human mice. Are you or your family members taking any of these? Look closely.
(formatting is a bit wonky… link to the wiki page at the end)
| Quilizumab[41] | mab | humanized | IGHE | asthma | ||
| Racotumomab[82] | Vaxira | mab | mouse | NGNA ganglioside | Y | non-small cell lung cancer |
| Radretumab[16] | mab | human | fibronectin extra domain-B | cancer | ||
| Rafivirumab[46] | mab | human | rabies virus glycoprotein | rabies (prophylaxis) | ||
| Ralpancizumab | mab | humanized | PCSK9 | dyslipidemia | ||
| Ramucirumab | Cyramza | mab | human | VEGFR2 | Y | solid tumors |
| Ranevetmab | mab | veterinary | NGF | osteoarthritis in dogs | ||
| Ranibizumab[9] | Lucentis | Fab | humanized | VEGF-A | Y | macular degeneration (wet form) |
| Raxibacumab[35] | mab | human | anthrax toxin, protective antigen | Y | anthrax (prophylaxis and treatment) | |
| Ravagalimab[5] | mab | humanized | CD40 | Crohn’s disease | ||
| Ravulizumab[27] | Ultomiris | mab | humanized | C5 | Y | paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome |
| Refanezumab | mab | humanized | myelin-associated glycoprotein | recovery of motor function after stroke | ||
| Regavirumab | mab | human | cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B | cytomegalovirus infection | ||
| Regdanvimab[29] | Regkirona[87] | mab | human | spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 | Y[87] | Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) |
| Relatlimab | mab | human | LAG3 | melanoma | ||
| Remtolumab[23] | mab | human | interleukin 17 alpha, TNF | ? | ||
| Reslizumab[7] | Cinqair | mab | humanized | IL-5 | Y | inflammations of the airways, skin and gastrointestinal tract |
| Rilotumumab | mab | human | hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) | solid tumors | ||
| Rinucumab | mab | human | platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta | neovascular age-related macular degeneration | ||
| Risankizumab[12] | Skyrizi | mab | humanized | IL23A | Y | Crohn’s disease, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and asthma |
| Rituximab | MabThera, Rituxan | mab | chimeric | CD20 | Y[88] | lymphomas, leukemias, some autoimmune disorders |
| Rivabazumab pegol[12] | mab | humanized | Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion system | ? | ||
| Robatumumab | mab | human | IGF-1 receptor (CD221) | cancer | ||
| Rmab | RabiShield | ? | human | ra bies virus G glycoprotein | Y | post-exposure prophylaxis of rabies |
| Roledumab[66] | mab | human | RHD (gene) (RHD) | Rh disease | ||
| Romilkimab[5] | mab | chimeric/humanized | interleukin 13 | ? | ||
| Romosozumab | Evenity | mab | humanized | sclerostin | Y | osteoporosis |
| Rontalizumab[49] | mab | humanized | IFN-α | systemic lupus erythematosus | ||
| Rosmantuzumab[23] | mab | humanized | root plate-specific spondin 3 | cancer | ||
| Rovalpituzumab tesirine[12] | mab | humanized | DLL3 | small cell lung cancer | ||
| Rovelizumab[44] | LeukArrest | mab | humanized | CD11, CD18 | Y | haemorrhagic shock etc. |
| Rozanolixizumab[23] | mab | chimeric/humanized | FCGRT | Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), myasthenia gravis | ||
| Ruplizumab[14] | Antova | mab | humanized | CD154 (CD40L) | Y | rheumatic diseases |
| SA237 | ? | humanized | IL-6R | neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders | ||
| Sacituzumab govitecan[23] | Trodelvy | mab | humanized | TROP-2 | Y[89] | triple-negative breast cancer |
| Samalizumab[39] | mab | humanized | CD200 | cancer | ||
| Samrotamab vedotin[5] | mab | chimeric/humanized | LRRC15 | cancer | ||
| Sarilumab[41] | Kevzara | mab | human | IL6 | Y | rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis |
| Satralizumab[67] | Enspryng | mab | humanized | IL6 receptor | Y | neuromyelitis optica |
| Satumomab pendetide | mab | mouse | TAG-72 | cancer (diagnosis) | ||
| Secukinumab | Cosentyx | mab | human | IL 17A | Y | uveitis, rheumatoid arthritis psoriasis |
| Selicrelumab[28] | mab | human | CD40 | ? | ||
| Seribantumab[36] | mab | human | ERBB3 (HER3) | cancer | ||
| Setoxaximab[36] | mab | chimeric | E. coli shiga toxin type-2 | ? | ||
| Setrusumab[27] | mab | human | sclerostin (SOST) | ? | ||
| Sevirumab | ? | human | cytomegalovirus | cytomegalovirus infection | ||
| Sibrotuzumab | mab | humanized | FAP (gene) (FAP) | cancer | ||
| SGN-CD19A | mab | humanized | CD19 | acute lymphoblastic leukemia and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma | ||
| SHP647 | ? | human | mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule | Crohn’s disease | ||
| Sifalimumab[16] | mab | human | IFN-α | systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), dermatomyositis, polymyositis | ||
| Siltuximab | Sylvant | mab | chimeric | IL-6 | Y | cancer |
| Simtuzumab[15] | mab | humanized | LOXL2 | fibrosis | ||
| Siplizumab[22] | mab | humanized | CD2 | psoriasis, graft-versus-host disease (prevention) | ||
| Sirtratumab vedotin[27] | mab | human | SLITRK6 | cancer | ||
| Sirukumab | mab | human | IL-6 | rheumatoid arthritis | ||
| Sofituzumab vedotin | mab | humanized | CA-125 | ovarian cancer | ||
| Solanezumab[82] | mab | humanized | beta amyloid | Alzheimer’s disease | ||
| Solitomab[41] | BiTE | mouse | EpCAM | gastrointestinal, lung, and other cancers | ||
| Sonepcizumab[90] | ? | humanized | sphingosine-1-phosphate | choroidal and retinal neovascularization | ||
| Sontuzumab[84] | mab | humanized | episialin | |||
| Sotrovimab[29] | Xevudy | mab | human | spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 | Y[91][92] | Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) |
| Spartalizumab[27] | mab | humanized | PDCD1, CD279 | melanoma | ||
| Stamulumab[1] | mab | human | myostatin | muscular dystrophy | ||
| Sulesomab | LeukoScan | Fab’ | mouse | NCA-90 (granulocyte antigen) | osteomyelitis (imaging) | |
| Suptavumab[23] | mab | human | RSVFR | medically attended lower respiratory disease | ||
| Sutimlimab[60] | Enjaymo | mab | chimeric/humanized | complement component 1s (C1s) | Y | cold agglutinin disease |
| Suvizumab[34] | mab | humanized | HIV-1 | viral infections | ||
| Suvratoxumab[28] | mab | human | Staphylococcus aureus alpha toxin | nosocomial pneumonia |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_therapeutic_monoclonal_antibodies
Nice work brother.
Thank you for this. If every person keeps this list and informs their doctor they want a substitute if at all possible, and mentions it to their pharmacist, this could make a difference, because doctors are constantly given new drugs to sample by pharma reps. If enough people object to these, sales go down, and that may make a difference. If not, you did your part for the babies. God help them, God help us.
Mark,
Who is harvesting the living organs from these babies/fetuses? The abortionist? Assistants? Where? Right there when the child is out of the birth canal? In another room? There would be witnesses to this if it is happening like this. Does anyone know?
Advanced Bioscience Resources is the organ trafficking partner of Planned Parenthood, as exposed by Project Veritas.
Also exposed by the Center for Medical Progress – David Daleidan’s group.
Yes, sorry, I misspoke.
So the abortionist is delivering live aborted babies to Advanced Bioscience Resources for them to do the gruesome work with living babies? If someone is vivisecting live babies, who is doing it and where and when? It’s got to be done fast, if done at all.
I get that fetal parts and flesh are sold. That’s established. Demonic.
But if someone is harvesting live, unfrozen fetal organs and flesh, who is doing that and when and where?
I thought the same thing too.
Does Advanced Bioscience Resources have”employees” that work out of each Planned Parenthood site? Just wondering how they are able to get the living organs so quickly to the site where the “research” is taken place.
It seems like a step is missing in the process from the abortion to the research site.
Live birth abortion, fetus must be alive in order for viable organs to be “harvested”. Organs are removed without any kind of anesthesia for fetus, they writhe in pain as they are cut open. Then they are disposed of. Nice.
And who is doing that? Where? When?
Live organs have to be taken while they’re still live.
On the table. Or minutes after.
If that’s happening, who is doing it? Who is holding down the baby when they do it?
Where does it happen?
How soon after the abortion/birth?
I believe University of Pittsburgh is one place.
https://www.newsweek.com/university-pittsburgh-wont-explain-its-planned-parenthood-ties-opinion-1594564
Thank you for posting that.
https://www.liveaction.org/news/pro-life-protest-ucsf-fetal-organ-harvesting/
Here’s another, University of California San Francisco.
Search online there is info available
Should people start seeking out holistic doctors? Sounds like there’s going to be an emerging market for Catholic holistic doctors, without the woo. As it stands right now. A lot of holistic doctors and practitioners are into the occult.
Yes but you are right that we have to be careful not to get into the trap of those that are into the occult. Everyone should try to be as naturally healthy as possible. There are hundreds, if not thousands of natural herbs that are just as effective – if not more – than what big pharma has been shoving down our throats all these years. Drinking lots of water, staying away from processed foods and sugars and getting lots of vitamins C, D and zinc can make a world of difference in one’s health.
Unless it’s not being done in the U.S., but somewhere else. ?
If someone claims vivisecting, state who and where and when.
Didn’t you see the undercover videos of abortionists negotiating pricing and procedures with fetal organ dealers? It’s was all over the internet.
Yes. I did. Those demonic monsters took organs from dead babies. From hell. But it was not vivisection.
Vivisection has witnesses. Somewhere, someone took a living being, forced him or her down, cut into them and was skilled enough to know how exactly to find and take out an organ. While the victim is still alive. And then have something there to put the flesh in to preserve it.
This is gruesome, I know, but needed.
It’s bad enough that flesh from dead babies is sold, but vivisection is an additional level of activity from hell and should be supported with some fact or info before alleged.
Unless, it’s all happening in China.
Then it’s a free for all.
Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word ‘vivisection’. The act can be done by an individual, so the act itself doesn’t ‘require’ witnesses. I used to TEACH students how to do it – on animals – in a course called Science Technology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach back in the 70’s. There’s a who, where, what and when for you. But those students, who got their Science Technician certificate at the end of a 2 year course, could go out into the scientific and medical research world and DO it with or without supervision, so the ACT is done whether or not there’s a man or woman who can be called into court to testify, and in ALL acts there is at least One ‘witness’ who knows what happened at everybody’s particular judgement, the other individual will be the accuser.
But I can assure you that there ARE people who have been trained in just enough anatomy to do this, and there is generally someone who brings that live baby TO the one DOing the vivisection, and the same or another someone taking the parts away for packaging and delivery to the client, so there’s your ‘witness’.
As Mark points out, that’s what those videos by the Center for Medical Progress was aiming at – obtaining at least that level of evidence it was happening HERE, in the US. From my experience – in ANIMAL vivisection (which would apply to human tissue, as well) – if the tissue is collected and ‘processes (put into a growth medium and appropriate container) immediately, then it’s viable from that point on, as long as it’s stored properly. That means doing it right there, on site, AT the abortion clinic. And while it CAN be the abortionist, it’s likely just a technician, either one working FOR the company buying the parts or the clinic’s technician whose job it is to do that. The abortionist is likely on to the next one and too busy (and gets paid too much) to do such menial work. If it’s NOT done there the baby would have to be kept alive long enough to be transported to some other site (university lab, other facility’s lab, etc.). Probably BOTH scenarios happen.
Thank you for posting this information. Pretty amazing that drugs involved cover so many unrelated conditions, even post injury rabies prophylaxis. After you scroll through this list, the names start to sound demonic. It’s so horrifying.
In Australia, the monoclonal antibody treatment offered is Sotrovimab. I highly suspect that it is tested on fetal tissue, but I cannot find solid evidence to confirm one way or the other. Can anyone provide a useful link for this particular product? (As you can see in the table above, the source of the cloned antibodies for Sotrovimab is “human”, and not “humanized [mice]”)
Thank you for your help.
A useful source of information – because they maintain cultures of all these cell lines – is the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). They list all their ‘products’ on their website. As to the development of the drugs, you can easily search scientific literature now, much of which is available as freely viewable or downloadable papers. Just start searching on the trade name or the product name. Go to the earlier papers and you’ll see what cell lines were used in developing the product. You don’t have to know all the procedures and techniques, just look for the sources in the ‘methods’ or ‘acknowledgements’ parts of the papers. They have to list WHERE they got the materials, or at least the names of the materials so others can replicate the experiments for themselves to verify the original work and claims.
One of the reasons why pain relief in late term abortion has been ruled out ,the cells and organs can’t be used if tainted with medication. https://gript.ie/watch-no-mercy-for-unborn-babies-as-tds-vote-against-pain-relief-in-late-abortions/l
I do see the information now, establishing that vivisection is happening here and has been.
Imagine doing that for a living. Doing it. Assisting at it. From start to finish. There are plenty who do. Hell on earth.