While America was reeling over a highly public political assassination–and as the radical Left was publicly rejoicing over it–the antipope did nothing to calm tensions, unify the people, or offer much comfort at all to his American kin. Rather, Prevost doubled down on his stance with sodomy in the Catholic Church.
“We have to change attitudes before we even think about changing what the Church says about any given question.”
– Robert Prevost, from an interview September 18, 2025 with Elise Ann Allen for her book, Leo XIV: Citizen of the World, Missionary of the XXI Century
On just the week prior to the assassination, a group of sexual degenerates who call themselves “F**K the Rules” freely waltzed into St. Peters under the armed guard of the police, the entire occasion carefully arranged by Vatican hierarchy. Make no mistake, this was with the complete approval of Prevost.
And recall, only two weeks prior, a tranny degenerate shot up a bunch of kids at Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Prevost’s response to this clear, anti-Catholic hate crime was tepid, to be sure. He offered his condolences, and then, four days later on a Sunday, he condemned the “pandemic of arms” that contributes to such violence.
See what he did there? Prevost made it about gun violence. Not the freakazoid killer. He also broadened his sorrow to “include in our prayers the countless children killed and injured every day around the world.” No outrage from this man. No leadership.
Instead, Christ-haters made damn sure to have their voices heard. Chris John Hohn of Natick, Massachusetts decided to celebrate the killing, spreading Tik Tok videos expressing his glee and satisfaction. And, in fact, Jewish Democrat Mayor Jacob Frey also used the Minneapolis shooting as an opportunity to complain about the state of gun control, and later he even defended the rights of the trans community:
“I have heard about a whole lot of hate that’s being directed at our trans community. Anybody who is using this as an opportunity to villainize our trans community or any other community out there has lost their sense of common humanity.”
We saw this demonic spirit of equivocating and outright rejoicing return only weeks later after Charlie Kirk was gunned down in front of his wife and children. And just like the Minneapolis shooting, the culprit in this case—at least according to the current narrative—was another gay tranny. And just as it was with the hate crime in August, Prevost’s response was once more lackluster. As of now, we only know that he expressed his condolences in a meeting with the U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See on September 13th.
These actions from the current antipope who rules the Vatican are what one calls repressive tolerance and anarcho-tyranny.
Anarcho-tyranny is the more familiar term. It is when anarchy reigns, and there is no kind of enforcement against transgressions or evil acts. And when the people appeal to authority, THEY are the ones who are shouted down or even punished. The other term, “repressive tolerance,” is similar. This term refers to a paradoxical situation in which a liberal power pretends to tolerate people’s expression—allowing or even promoting ideas that eventually perpetuate oppression and harm—all whilst that same power marginalizes anyone who has a problem with it. (Herbert Marcuse wrote about this in 1965.)
That is the arrangement which we live under…
Read the rest: https://theweltgeist.substack.com/p/political-assassinations-and-pro?
Well it wasn’t a tranny that shot Kirk, but it doesn’t have to be. The evil in the world today is all coordinated to one goal: worldwide chaos, collapse and misery that leads to apostasy and embrace of the anti Christ.
When Antipope Frank consecrated a demon, Pachamama, in St. Peter’s, that unleashed hell’s reign on earth. The tribulation has already started.
This is why nothing makes sense, why people act so irrationally, why even those who want to do good can’t seem to get it right. There is no soul to humanity anymore. And it’s just getting worse. And there is no world leader, including Lesser of 2 Evils Trump, that isn’t caught up in this.
“Well it wasn’t a tranny that shot Kirk” – It was a member of the Alphabet Mafia, whose boyfriend is a tranny, so it may as well have been. Transinsanity-adjacent.
“there is no world leader…” – Let’s fix the Pope situation, then. The Vicar of Christ legally owns all countries according to medieval law that was never quite cancelled & is therefore still in effect, right? Mass apostasy (as opposed to individual, isolated apostasy) begins at the top, right? The Pope is (supposed to be) the katechon, right? Yes, yes & yes.
If you listen to the LGBTQ part of the interview without bias and understand that this is a V2 Pope in 2025, you will understand that Pope Leo is not saying that Church doctrine will change.
“People want church doctrine to change and they want attitudes to change. I think we have to change attitudes before we ever change doctrine”. He’s giving a philosophical approach as to how those who wish to change doctrine need to think.
Before saying this, he says that for many people outside of the Western world, the issue of sexual identity is not a primary issue in terms of how we deal with one another. He goes on to say that everyone is invited into the Church, not because of sexual identity, but because he’s a son of God and that we should get to know one another and respect one another.
So, rationally, and without bias, what are the attitudes that need to change? People who want doctrine to change because of their identity, need to see their identity as being sons of God and know that everyone is invited into the church. They need to understand that their sexual identity is a Western fixation, that does not apply to many people outside of the West. Also, we all need to respect one another. If these attitudes change, doctrine does not need to change. And as doctrine cannot change, he goes on to say it’s unlikely to in the near future i.e. under his watch. He could have said it will never change rather than unlikely to change but he’s a diplomatic V2 Pope so…
Later, he says “individuals will be welcomed and received, any priest who’s ever heard confessions will have heard confessions from all kinds of people with all kinds of issues, all states of life and choices”.
Some people in the trad community, would be shocked if they were to see themselves as God sees them. There are people, especially in the trad community, who suffer from very high levels of pride and self righteousness and just live for pointing out and judging sins that are highly visible and scandalous. If only they knew how ugly their own sins are, how ugly pride and self righteousness is, and what it looks like to God when they get on their soap boxes and judge and point fingers and throw stones at others, as though they are sinless. The hypocrisy! Pope Leo is a human being with flaws, just as Benedict was and JPII was and so on.
He mocks your charity in popesplaing his plain English words by promoting the Sodo parade at St Peter’s and the sodo Mass at the Gesu, and the promotion of sodo enablers into high ecclesiastical office, and/or the retention of them ie Tucho. Prepare to be ratioed.
I will not be ratioed.
Is sodo enablers in high ecclesiastical office new, even in the Bergoglio era? Also, haven’t gay priests and bishops been parading themselves in churches across Europe and America for decades?
I’m not saying that Pope Leo is not flawed. But I don’t believe he’s pushing the gay agenda, actively. I don’t think he’s stupid enough to say that we need to change attitudes so we can change doctrine to accept homosexuality. How dumb do you think he is? And don’t say it’s the Luciferian thing of revealing to us the bad thing he intends to do before he does it.
He said it loud and clearly and encouraged their parade in the Vatican, Kevin, while promoting those who push sodomy and heterodoxy.
How dumb do you have to be to doublethink otherwise, Kevin?
I don’t know Johnno, why don’t you tell me?
Mike Lewis level cope right here.
“People who want doctrine to change because of their identity, need to see their identity as being sons of God and know that everyone is invited into the church.” – Indeed.
From what I understand, some LGBT-identity people feel that the Church picks on them because straight people have at least some mode of licit sex. I have to explain, no, the traditional Church is hard on everybody, or on every sexual act that isn’t deliberate procreation within marriage, which is pretty rare, so that even married people are often sexual sinners.
“Some people in the trad community…suffer from very high levels of pride and self righteousness.” – Indeed. And outside too.
Or as I like to say, we are all sinners. All except Mary & Jesus. Pray for me, a sinner. And anytime anybody comes on to me like they’re not a sinner: That alone says they have sins of pride and dishonesty, at a minimum. Also they seem to want my positive attention, which I give to them in spirit by praying for their salvation, on the spot if possible.
Yes – they’ve turned their sinful lifestyle into an identity that demands visibility and acceptance and therefore feel that they don’t belong. They do belong in the church as all sinners do but they need to convert just as all sinners do. Their sinful lifestyle is not acceptable as sons of God. They need to change their attitude.
“…after Charlie Kirk was gunned down in front of his wife and children.”
👆🏻Quoted from Laramie’s article.
Were his wife and children present for Charlie’s murder?
Not sure of his name, but Charlie’s “apologetics coach”
(the guy in the white hat holding his phone during Charlie’s murder)
said on his video podcast released a day or so later, Charlie’s wife and children were not present and needed to be flown in.
Point being, there’s so much confusion with this story that by now we should be able to get the basic information such as who was there, who wasn’t etc.
Katie, fair point. I noticed it too.
The murder was recorded and distributed widely. His kids will see it. She may have been watching a live feed. The portrayal is that she was there in person, but he theoretically was shot in front of them.
Is that wife number 1 or number 2? Two similar long blonde haired women are being presented….they are laughing in our faces. (See recent video on Charlie Kirk’s YouTube channel). She is not the blonde who was presented at the memorial…can people really not see this or is it willful ignorance? I am losing hope….).
The ‘murder’ had a few too many coincidences for my liking….
https://www.thinkinghousewife.com/2025/09/strange-connections-1998-film-snake-eyes/
His ‘friends’ don’t look too upset to me…
https://www.thinkinghousewife.com/2025/09/tucker-laughs/
https://www.thinkinghousewife.com/2025/09/occult-symbols-at-the-kirk-memorial/
Nor does wife number 2, or is this 1, or….3?
https://youtu.be/dJT8briXJXs?si=OXFyGR3Vy6Bc1DKP
A completely different wife to this one…
https://youtu.be/gcyRloq5U3U?si=v9x08zZkdt-9xPi7
It’s all laid out at Hivemind Nation (for anyone not under this ridiculous spell 🙏 )
https://youtu.be/piXmhlqoqUM?si=N0PXtP9IXXzS0Tuc
I was just reading how not declaring the truth when known is an omission?