Why does Lifesite News have a CEO?

Another cross post, this one from Adam Piggott. I listened to the audio from the LifeSite board meeting. Some serious charges, but also much pearl clutching, particularly from Patrick the Comptroller. While hurling charge after charge against JHW, he repeatedly states “I take no pleasure in this,” whilst he is clearly getting off on it. -nvp


Why does Lifesite News have a CEO?

The public ping pong at Lifesite News continues. Westen is now back in, there is leaked audio of the board meeting, and a lot of people on that audio come off as self serving assholes.

I have little sympathy for Westen. Why exactly does a website need a board of directors? It smacks of someone wanting to be seen as very important indeed, or wanting their business to seem very important indeed. Well, if you decide you want a board then you’ll have to fill it. And 90% of people are idiots, and that’s without the self serving or asshole parts.

I have some small experience in these matters. If you set something up and you want to retain control when it gets bigger, keep it simple stupid. You don’t need a board and you certainly do not need a CEO. The CEO is the epitome of business modernism. How ironic that a website designed to fight the scourge of modernism put in place a CEO. That’s like the Orthodox Church electing a pope.

If Westen wants to hang on and return Lifesite to its original ethos of directly pointing out heresy and modernism in the Catholic Church then he has only one option; fire the entire board, fire the CEO, fire and fire and fire some more. Clean house with ruthless and brutal efficiency. He could probably burn some public effigies while he’s at it. I’d also get a real exorcist in and do some serious spiritual cleansing.

Then hire some real firebrand Catholic writers that don’t use big words, that are not academics, that don’t rely on smoking cigars or drinking pints of fruity IPA as some sort of Trad Inc members club, but who have some balls and are willing to point out the hypocrites when they see them.

This stuff isn’t complicated. The Bible is not complicated. Jesus was not complicated. He was very clear, very direct, and His message was fearfully simple. Our enemies embedded on our side love to make things complicated. They love to use esoteric terms and teachings to muddy the waters, like the clown described here by Chris Jackson.

Can Westen do it? I don’t know, but if he doesn’t then Lifesite is doomed which was the goal of his enemies from the beginning.

https://pushingrubberdownhill.com/2025/07/19/why-did-lifesite-news-have-a-ceo/

5 thoughts on “Why does Lifesite News have a CEO?”

  1. Anyone who has even minor experience with a non-profit knows that a Board is named because they bring MONEY, or can influence people with MONEY to drop some in the till.

    JHW can fire anyone he wants, of course.

  2. Since we are asserting that everything that Jesus said is clear, what did Jesus mean by the parable of the Good Samaritan? My plain understanding of this does not comport with what I daily observe in the Catholic Media, amongst the best, most faithful Catholics of all times, so I occasionally think I am too simple in my understanding.

  3. “Pearl-clutching” – yes – or also the virtue-signaling of what great servants of the Lord they are.

    Such protestations should be taken as 1) given for everybody present at a LifeSiteNews board meeting; 2) unnecessary.

    That they put it in, smells of, photo op / We know we’re being recorded.

    But I stand by my earlier point: They do *feel* they’re onto something important and righteous, which means they’re not done. “It’s not over”.

  4. As to the overall point here: LifeSite probably has a CEO & board just because Canada makes them, or would suppress them even hard without it.

    In other words, sorry Adam but it is not some deep point.

    You can go guerilla with your message, be an independent from your own blog or X account. Or you can try to have the rest of the world view you as a media organization, which means you run as an incorporated nonprofit under a ton of laws. Yes. ‘Twas ever thus. Pick one.

Leave a Reply to urielangeliCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.