Full transcript: https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/events/event.dir.html/content/vaticanevents/en/2025/5/18/regina-caeli.html
“Whoever…willingly and knowingly helps in the promulgation of heresy… is suspected of heresy.” -Canon 2316, Code of Canon Law (1917-1982)
But what if Pope Prevost really is being accompanied by the spiritual presence of Bergoglio? Shouldn’t we take him at his word?
What a scary thought! St.Michael the Archangel…
Yuck! ☠️🤮☠️
This doesn’t portend well.
Oh oh….looks like 22 sedevacantism lives on.
Didn’t they reduce the requisite miracles in the canonisation process by 50% from two to one? If so, I’m guessing NuChurch, which can never be accused of being too dogmatic to adapt as circumstances dictate, might want to introduce a further thaumaturgy reduction of say 100% and pronto. Necessity is the mother of invention, as they say.
The honeymoon is over before it got started. If Jorge Bergoglio is in Heaven then so is Martin Luther.
Is there another source? Naturally, I was scandalized and curious, so I did a quick search on this, and did not come up with anything other than a YouTube short from this same account (Reason and Theology). No verbals from Pope Leo in that video, and no citation of reportage.
There was a search hit from 22 days ago, in which Cardinal Re said something like this in a homily, but that’s Cardinal Re…
https://www.reddit.com/r/TraditionalCatholics/comments/1k8gsnh/closing_his_homily_cardinal_re_says_pope_francis/
I am hopeful that this is misinformation.
JS, I linked the official transcript from the Vatican website. What more do you want?
Somehow missed that in looking at the Tweet…. Yikes. Very concerning.
They could just spin this as, “Look! All your prayers worked! All that fasting Ms. Barnhardt recommended saved Franky!”
Bergoglio’s public heresy as Pope would have required public confession and repudiation by him prior to death to gain Heaven. He didn’t do that.
He sure didn’t. He also refused to receive the sacraments on his death bed. So much for God’s mercy he lectured us about. While lying in repose, his body was starting to decompose rapidly. He was a revolting shade of grayish green the day before the coffin was sealed and I can’t imagine the stench the poor Swiss Guards standing by had to endure. There’s no way that evil son of a bitch is in Heaven right now.
Perhaps, since prelates failed to expose and repudiate the usurpation of Bergoglio, God will permit the revolutionaries carrying out the coup in the institutional part of the Church to go full clown planet and canonize Bergoglio, thereby finally assisting reluctant faithful to see things for what they are.
That would be a mercy. On the other hand, one can not wish for actual evil, which such a blasphemy would be (not implying you wished for such a thing but rather that I seemed to).
Of course he will ‘canonize’ Bergoglio. But if people can’t already see the Argentine Activist was an apostate, they just don’t want to see it. So much more comfortable to drift along claiming loyalty to a series of non-popes. I have family members who get defensive about the Frankster and repeat the slogan “My pope, right or wrong!”
Novus Ordites lost faith in the Petrine Promise and have no understanding of the papacy. Our Blessed Lord knows we are sheep and He would never install an imposter to lead us astray. These hirelings are not shepherds.
Are canonizations infallible? I thought the question was still unsettled on that.
My understanding is that they are (were) before VII. How any Catholic could believe P6 or JP2 are Saints is beyond me. P6 destroyed the Mass and sacraments. JP openly blasphemed God at Assisi and his very public kissing of the satanic koran.
Of course I understand the ’22 sede position that an anti pope canonized them, but Ratzinger opened the cause.
EVERYTHING being applied to Bergoglio and now Pope Bob can be applied to all the post conciliar “popes’.
VII and its ‘popes’ teaches and promoted false ecumenism and religious liberty….something the true Church cannot do.
By a valid pope: yes, completely.
By the N.O. church and it’s false popes: absolutely not.
Even those who one would regarding as obvious saints (e.g. Padre Pio) should – or at least I do and think I’m correct in so doing – be referred to as ‘Saintly’.
And another thing: prayers for the pope’s intentions? Pray for those of Pius XII.
The Six Objective Intentions of the Holy Father (from the Raccolta)
1. The Exaltation of the Church
2. The Propagation of the Faith
3. The Extirpation of Heresy
4. The Conversion of Sinners
5. Concord between Christian Princes
6. The Further Welfare of the Christian People