8 thoughts on “Prevost was the top pick of Fr. James Martin”

  1. All the wicked men (and many trads) think it’ll be Francis II, and the mayhem will continue. Francis was a false pope. Leo XIV is not.

    I can’t wait to see the look on James Martin’s face when he finds out the Holy Spirit had other plans.

    1. We shall see. He’s definitely a validly elected Pope. Might surprise us in a good way and not in a “God of surprises” way.

  2. So the anti-Catholic, jewish-owned and operated NY Times ran an endorsement of Prevost right before the conclave? Same for the anti-Catholic, jesuit National Catholic Reporter, plus a couple other mainstream Catholic publications… What a coincidence that he gets elected today!

    If this was a done deal before the conclave began, that makes the conclave invalid and we have another antipope.

    Sed libera nos a malo!

  3. Don’t know that a NY Times article constitutes sufficient interference to invalidate a conclave. The electors are free to follow the promptings of the Holy Ghost or the unholy NYT. If you are suggesting the article is an indication of CIA interference (the NYT being a subsidiary of the CIA), that’s another story.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.