I think of the text of the Third Secret of Fatima, at least the description of the vision we have. I ask myself, will this man be the Holy Father who is martyred outside the half ruined city? Or will there be another before the martyr pope? If they had released the accompanying ‘words of Our Lady’ that they are hiding, we would know, but the text of the vision only references two men, the bishop dressed in white and the martyred Holy Father.
Father Nix is so luminously holy and wise. He’s leading many souls to heaven. He’s trying to build a hermitage where The Mass of Ages and other sacraments will be offered. He needs your support. Go to his website Padre Peregrino and learn how to send a donation. Snail mail checks accepted.
Thanks for allowing me this plug on his behalf, Mark.
All holy hermits, pray for us!
Our Lady of The Holy Itinerant, pray for us.
I mostly agree with Padre. A B17 or JP3 would devastating for the NOrdites seeing as they too were false popes. I’m wondering if the “conclave” will parallel our Trump election. So many still deceived by Trump.
Probably no parallel is possible. Our Lord could intervene for the good guys, yes, but Bergoglio stacked the voting members. It would be like the Biden faux administration passing a law that only 10 percent of Republicans could vote.
Fr. Nix seems to suggest that what St. Pio called “The false church ruled by Satan” is somehow on life support and nearing its end. Unfortunately, the probability exists that the false church the Saint is referring to might actually be just beginning.
This was the danger of not removing Bergoglio for 12 years, and now pretending that this absolutely unprecedented “conclave” (81% made up of appointees from a heretic antipope is absolutely unprecedented) is just fine, dandy, and perfectly valid.
It might be prudent to read up on the prophecy of St. Francis – it seems most likely that we are somewhere between the 3rd and 4th sentences of the Prophecy, and what comes next does not include the death of the false church.
Evil, by its very nature, is deceptive. And most, unfortunately, presume that they will always be given to see.
If you say that Vatican II taught heresies, then it follows that those who pushed it were heretics. If those who pushed it were heretics, then they were not popes. If they were not popes, they did not give bishops any jurisdiction since Pius XII. To be a formal successor of the apostles, it is necessary to not only have orders but jurisdiction. But all bishops ordained before the death of Pius XII are dead. This means apostolic succession has ceased. Since the sun keeps rising and setting, time has not ended. But then the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church defected and contradicted its own dogma of indefectibilify.
If Vatican II had soul destroying error you then have a genuine ecumenical council convoked by a legitimate pope (see #1 if he nor his successors were pope) teaching noxious errors. This also opens the door to reject any ecumenical council you don’t like.
If you doubt what I am saying, verify it in theological manuals. Whatever errors come from the time of VII cannot come from the council itself, even if they come from the same time period or in its name.
You’re thinking in black and white – but the real issue is the gray areas. Things written in council documents can be wrong, without making the whole council invalid or all involved heretics. Your argument is way too simplified and really defensive. Do not be afraid to see that real serious errors and problems came out of the changes in the 1960’s and 70’s – but the Church remains. What the Church has always taught and always believed everywhere, is what we must believe, not what modernist Church leaders have been teaching for the last 50 years (or more.) I came into the Church in 2020, knowing full well that there were many scandals, and errors being promoted from the very highest levels of the Church leadership – but I knew that I was wrong as a protestant and that the Church was started by Jesus, and lead by the Holy Ghost – and that the constant and perennial teaching of the Church is what we must believe. I go to the old mass, pray the old Divine Office, and read the Doctors of the Church and the Catechism of Trent and am happy and at peace. Even in the storm, if we go deeper, under the wind and the waves – all is calm.
I think of the text of the Third Secret of Fatima, at least the description of the vision we have. I ask myself, will this man be the Holy Father who is martyred outside the half ruined city? Or will there be another before the martyr pope? If they had released the accompanying ‘words of Our Lady’ that they are hiding, we would know, but the text of the vision only references two men, the bishop dressed in white and the martyred Holy Father.
Father Nix is so luminously holy and wise. He’s leading many souls to heaven. He’s trying to build a hermitage where The Mass of Ages and other sacraments will be offered. He needs your support. Go to his website Padre Peregrino and learn how to send a donation. Snail mail checks accepted.
Thanks for allowing me this plug on his behalf, Mark.
All holy hermits, pray for us!
Our Lady of The Holy Itinerant, pray for us.
I mostly agree with Padre. A B17 or JP3 would devastating for the NOrdites seeing as they too were false popes. I’m wondering if the “conclave” will parallel our Trump election. So many still deceived by Trump.
Probably no parallel is possible. Our Lord could intervene for the good guys, yes, but Bergoglio stacked the voting members. It would be like the Biden faux administration passing a law that only 10 percent of Republicans could vote.
Including Fr. Nix!
Fr. Nix seems to suggest that what St. Pio called “The false church ruled by Satan” is somehow on life support and nearing its end. Unfortunately, the probability exists that the false church the Saint is referring to might actually be just beginning.
This was the danger of not removing Bergoglio for 12 years, and now pretending that this absolutely unprecedented “conclave” (81% made up of appointees from a heretic antipope is absolutely unprecedented) is just fine, dandy, and perfectly valid.
It might be prudent to read up on the prophecy of St. Francis – it seems most likely that we are somewhere between the 3rd and 4th sentences of the Prophecy, and what comes next does not include the death of the false church.
Evil, by its very nature, is deceptive. And most, unfortunately, presume that they will always be given to see.
He’s right. The rupture needs to stop being papered over with words like ‘hermeneutic’. Christianity and history is not that complicated.
If you say that Vatican II taught heresies, then it follows that those who pushed it were heretics. If those who pushed it were heretics, then they were not popes. If they were not popes, they did not give bishops any jurisdiction since Pius XII. To be a formal successor of the apostles, it is necessary to not only have orders but jurisdiction. But all bishops ordained before the death of Pius XII are dead. This means apostolic succession has ceased. Since the sun keeps rising and setting, time has not ended. But then the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church defected and contradicted its own dogma of indefectibilify.
If Vatican II had soul destroying error you then have a genuine ecumenical council convoked by a legitimate pope (see #1 if he nor his successors were pope) teaching noxious errors. This also opens the door to reject any ecumenical council you don’t like.
If you doubt what I am saying, verify it in theological manuals. Whatever errors come from the time of VII cannot come from the council itself, even if they come from the same time period or in its name.
You’re thinking in black and white – but the real issue is the gray areas. Things written in council documents can be wrong, without making the whole council invalid or all involved heretics. Your argument is way too simplified and really defensive. Do not be afraid to see that real serious errors and problems came out of the changes in the 1960’s and 70’s – but the Church remains. What the Church has always taught and always believed everywhere, is what we must believe, not what modernist Church leaders have been teaching for the last 50 years (or more.) I came into the Church in 2020, knowing full well that there were many scandals, and errors being promoted from the very highest levels of the Church leadership – but I knew that I was wrong as a protestant and that the Church was started by Jesus, and lead by the Holy Ghost – and that the constant and perennial teaching of the Church is what we must believe. I go to the old mass, pray the old Divine Office, and read the Doctors of the Church and the Catechism of Trent and am happy and at peace. Even in the storm, if we go deeper, under the wind and the waves – all is calm.