Across the transom. I don’t know who this person is, the blog appears to be anon, so I have no way of contacting him. But I’m pasting it here with the link at the end. -nvp
False Pope Creating a False Church because Good Catholics Will Not Stop Him
Amici,
Whatever Jorge Mario Bergoglio is creating in Rome via his “Synod”, now extended apparently a number of years (we’ll never get rid of it! You KNOW it is “Vatican III”) – whatever it is, it is not the Catholic Church.
How obvious is this? Just reading, even skimming, some of the stuff going on at that Synod strikes me as completely alien to EVERYTHING Catholic. So, clearly, the false pope is creating a false Church.
Can we be remotely surprised?
Yes, Bergoglio is creating a false Church via his “Synod on Synodality”. And good men like Cardinals Burke, Müller, bishops such as Bishop Athanasius Schneider, and of course a host of Conservative Catholics (Fr. Gerald Murray and Robert Royal are exemplars) and Trad Catholics – too numerous to count, but Professor Peter Kwasniewski is an excellent example, are letting him do it.
They’re letting Bergoglio get away with it because they insist he is a valid pope, and actually occupies the cathedra of St. Peter. As I’ve written a number of times, Bergoglio is painfully obviously not a pope, and has never acted like one, so therefore insisting he is a valid pope leads inevitably to cognitive dissonance. You’ll go cross-eyed insisting this fool – and no, I’m not very nice to “Bergi” – is an actual pope. In fact, you’ll lose your faith if you insist on maintaining the charade.
Video Tells All
Ever see see that video of Bergoglio nine years ago walking along a hallway, spying two young altar servers, one with his hands in the classic prayer position? Bergoglio says something, then stops, and physically pulls the boy’s hands apart, saying “Are your hands bound together? Seems like they’re stuck.” That little scene, right there, affirmed my growing suspicions and I’ve never believed he was pope after that. (If I ever really believed it before.)
He wears a diabolical pectoral cross, too, as I’ve written here. And the man has consistently proven he is not a pope, nor a Catholic, and not even a Christian. Yet all these good men noted above insist he is actually pope and must be “resisted”. Don’t they comprehend doing that is driving a stake through the heart of the papacy? If it survives Bergoglio’s wrecking ball at all, it will be stunted, shackled, and marginalized. Thanks to them.
And so will the Church.
Now, Ann Barnardt and her friends insist Benedict XVI did not validly resign in the first place. I think they make excellent arguments. Archbishop Viganò makes the superb argument that Bergoglio accepted his election without intending to serve as pope’s are supposed to; it would be like a marriage being declared invalid because one of the partners had no intention of keeping any of his vows in the first place. Both these arguments are splendid, indeed, but for me, I think it is simply, horrifically blatant that there’s nothing papal about this lout. So, GET HIM OUT! And any argument that can effect that is a most excellent argument, indeed!
Otherwise, all these well-meaning folk will do as much damage to Holy Mother Church as Bergoglio himself, and ALL his perverted peeps, are doing.
AnP
AB is no friend of mine. She is right about B16 and Bergoglio though.
Cuz “Benedict” was so Catholic and Traditional and a real pope, right?? He was a known, thorough Modernist, architect of V2, and helped destroy the papacy. He planned it for years. Just like this whole BiP-Benevacantist-resignationist drama is a distraction from the fact that the physical Church and hierarchy were thoroughly infiltrated and overthrown before V2. It is keeping well-meaning people under the umbrella of the apostate, inverted, satanic false church. Did you know that back in “Paul VI”‘s reign, people were promoting the same “The pope is being held captive” line that was said about Benedict, in order to distance him from his evil actions? Sometimes it seems the more knowledgeable a Catholic is, the less likely they are to see/admit the reality, the enormity that what was prophesied has happened.
I hope you will reconsider when the words of consecration are changed. From where I’m looking at it the satanic one world church is being built as we speak.
When you interpret prophecy, are you keeping in mind that it can be interpreted in more than one way? Anne Catherine Emmerich spoke of two popes, not six, a white pope and a black pope. The black pope would build a one world church where all heretics are invited to take communion, where the real presence will be gone, and would be like a democracy (a parliament or synod, maybe?).
“…you’ll lose your faith if you insist on maintaining the charade.”
The great apostasy already happened and continues because the Novus 🌍 Ordo is not the Catholic faith,/Church.
This is wrong. But as Mark Twain said it is easier to fool someone than convince him he’s been fooled.
“This is wrong.” State your evidence Jimmy, or be silent.
The rotten fruit of V2 these past 6 decades points to ’58 sedevacante.
The apostasy these past 6 decades points to ’58 sedevacante.
The 5 decades long existence of SSPX points to ’58 sedevacante.
And yes, it IS easier to fool someone than to convince them they’ve been fooled…right back at ya.
V2 wasn’t a dogmatic council, no heresies came out of it.
No pope except this antipope has taught heresy.
Even if V2 was a heresy, taking yourself out of the Church accomplishes what the modernists wanted with V2. You’re doing the work for them.
You left Jesus when He was wounded. That is Sedevacantism : a temper tantrum that cause people to basically protestantize themselves
When Trent issued its reforms there were no doubt ppl like you who left the Church.
I wonder how that worked out for them.
Sedevacantism is indefensible. It’s the equivalent of leaving Jesus dying on the cross.
You fight for the Church from within
“Rome has lost the Faith, my dear friends, Rome is in apostasy. These are not words in the air. It is the truth. Rome is in apostasy… They have left the Church… This is sure, sure,sure.” September 4 1987 Econe Switzerland Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
Abp. Lefebvre seems to disagree with you Jimmy, as does other actual Catholic clergy. Although he didn’t have the stones to admit sedevacante, he was excommunicated from the fake Church/Pope. But thank you for explaining your position, even though you give zero proof from theology or ecclesiology.
See Apocalypse 18:4
Is Lefebvre correct on any sort of actual canonical/dogmatic proof he has or does he just sound good to you?
The irony is that the sedes actually left the Church. V2 was far from the first crisis the Church had. And in the past those crises have been settled.
But apparently tbe gates of hell did prevail in 1958, right? And Lefebvre is the one of the few who caught on?
I’m not going to be dazzled or shamed by your fallacy of appealing to authority. Nor do I care about the contempt of how you use my name.
But I know facts, logic, some history, etc. And I know you sedes left the Catholic Church. You declared apostasy. You chose to protest. You gave up.
I guarantee if this ship is righted and we get a pope who erases V2, you sedes will stay sedes. Because it is now a cult , which super smart guy Lefebvre should’ve known would happen.
He let Christ down just as you have.
By the way, by invoking Revelation 18:4 you are comparing the Catholic Church to Babylon and the Whore of Babylon . Which is something a Protestant would do.
Right now antipope Bergoglio is constructing an actual anti Church on top of the Church. He’s doing it with heresy, appeals to brotherhood, even Satanism.
The wounded Church is full of cowed and blackmailed prelates who do nothing while people like you do nothing because you separated yourself long ago.
The going got tough and you got going.
The remnant is not you. You will not suffer from persecution because even Satan knows where the Catholics are. You’re outside the fight.
How dare you compare Christ’s Church with Babylon.
I have a new Catholic site bookmarked on my computer that joins the select few worth reading (NonVeni, Barnhardt, Canon212, LesFemmes, HarveyMillican, FrZ). This guy – whoever he is – is excellent. Spot on in this essay and I hope lots of stubborn “Fwancis is da pope!!!” Trads will read this and reflect on it. His other writings are good too so check out his archives – especially the current ones on the present Israel Gaza situation.
Thank you Mark for sharing this great post.
I cam to this conclusion during the scamdemic. No matter how much they assert they are preventing schism, they are also promoting apostasy, especially by calling fideism Catholic, when faith and reason are not contrary.
Not saying they do it intentionally, but Catholicism allows for rational thinking and has a natural law tradition.
They don’t know what to do. Paralyzed, like when a train wrecks right in front of you.
Dalrock wrote a very poignant piece three and a half years ago, the whichbwith minimal editing could apply to the Francis-is-Pope crowd.
A very common lament about Francis-is-pope Catholics is their uncanny knack for finding a way to “lose with honor” no matter how strong their position might be. Winning really doesn’t seem to be the objective. This makes perverse sense when you consider it from the virtue-ness perspective. The best way to prove your virtue is not to win, but to lose. For losing is the ultimate test of your virtue. If you can bear a demon-worshipping, schismo-heretic, sodo-bastard pope with magnanimity, then you truly are virtuous!
As George Carlin said…The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.