It’s hard to shock me. It really is. But this is just jaw dropping, and all the receipts are here. This is Dr. Josh Guetzkow’s work, reportage via Bad Cattitude (substack highly recommended).
how do you miss the most blatant safety signal in vaccine history?
the trick, it would appear, is to ignore your own guidelines and never even look for it
what’s worse than not having a helmet when playing football?
thinking you have one when you don’t.
it’s the worst of all worlds: the illusion of safety where there is none. you are trusting in protection that does not exist.
you will tackle head first and the be shocked when you spill your brains all over the gridiron.
this is why actually following safety procedures is so vital and why our public health regulators have lost so much credibility:
the CDC has become a helmet made of cheap, walmart easter bunny grade chocolate.
and it’s getting us all hurt.
THIS is a dazzling story and a great find using FOIA to force the CDC to disclose its process. if cats wore hats, i would doff mine to josh. this is even more stunning than when the CDC admitted (also under FOIA) that they did not have a single RCT supporting mask use to stop covid.
josh published THIS piece back in sept 2021. it uses the CDC’s own published methodology to assess the VAERS data for covid vaccines. the results were unequivocal.
After that article was published, I urged CHD’s legal team to submit a FOIA request to the CDC about its VAERS monitoring activities.
Since CDC officials stated publicly that “COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring is the most robust in U.S. history,” I had assumed that at the very least, CDC officials were monitoring VAERS using the methods they described in a briefing document posted on the CDC website in January 2021 (and updated in February 2022, with minor changes).
I was wrong.
the crux of the issue is this:
the CDC uses PRR (proportional reporting ratio) itself a questionable and limited method of acting as canary in the vaccine coal mine to seek out safety signals.
this is their own text.
but, when asked about it under FOIA, this was their response: (red box mine)
not only did they not perform the safety monitoring they were supposed to. at all. but they go on to claim that doing so is outside their purview and suggest asking the FDA instead. (who does not do this work, it’s supposed to be the CDC.)
this is just stunning.
what a complete and total fail and abrogation of duty and diligence.
either “most robust in US history” was a complete and total fabrication or wow have we been running around totally unprotected for decades. which one fills you with confidence?
fake politicized health agencies providing fake political science and selective safety practice tailored to suit industry and policy are killing us. literally.
claiming to have missed this is like pretending not to have heard a bad bunny concert going on right behind you in a library.
quite literally any other vaccine in history would have been pulled off the market for 1/100th of this.
this is either egregious dereliction of duty or and outright lie in FOIA response.
they either did not do the analysis because they knew what they’d find if they did
they did do the analysis and are hiding it because of what it showed and the fact that they could never justify inaction in the face of it.
there is simply no plausible case that they “forgot” or “did not think it was important” or “saw no reason to use resources on it.”
Read the rest: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/how-do-you-miss-the-most-blatant
7 thoughts on “Breaking: CDC admits it never monitored VAERS to assess deathvaxx safety data; claims “not my job””
I was astounded at the lack of available resources and PPE and the obvious CDC shilling for drug companies at the outset, and thought it was surely a joke, or typical bureaucratic incompetence, and would be sorted out. EVERY USG agency has been weaponized against America. Do not expect help from these “people”. Expect persecution, death, pedophilia, surveillance, etc. I am still astounded that so many supposedly intelligent “First World” people actually altered their God-given DNA for a flu with a 99.7% survival rate. It does not compute!
They altered their DNA for fear of death. When one doesn’t have faith in an afterlife, one only has this life. The world today focuses on the here and now, not the future, therefore people will do whatever to maintain their earthly life. So much money and time is invested in looking younger, thinner, buffer ( if that’s a word😏) that they have lost touch with the fact that they one day will die, to the point that they would put anything in their bodies to try to stave off death. Pathetic really.
Ah yes… “Shifting the blame” goes back all the way to the Garden of Eden.
And the exclamation point on the whole thing is that VAERS is under-reported by AT LEAST 2 digits….by the govt’s own admission! Aaaand they’ve recently been busted ‘erasing’ cases. The safety signal’s been waaaaay worse than even what VAERS ‘officially’ shows (and that’s plenty bad enough), and it’s ALL being done with full malice aforethought. we’re. in. hell.
Vaccine batches vary systematically in toxicity and are distributed to unsuspecting Americans by three companies: researcher
One company allegedly performed toxic dose range finding without consent (Updated 1/9/22)
James Hill, MD, JD
Dec 5, 2021
Researcher Craig Paardekooper (Kingston University, London) claims US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data show vaccine batches are sequentially marked by varying toxicity.
Read here about his batch lookup site, howbad.info.
VAERS shows about 1 in 200 vaccine batches (~ 0.5%) are “highly toxic,” having a high number (1000-5000 times the baseline rate) of severe adverse reactions — including hospitalization, disability, and death — in the short term, i.e., within a few days or weeks of injection.
70% have only one short-term adverse event reported.
80% have only one or two short-term adverse events reported.
The toxic batches are distributed among all 50 US states.
You can look up VAERS data on batch toxicity at http://howbad.info, at least unless and until they change the batch numbering system to conceal toxic batches.
Ex-Pfizer VP and Chief Scientific Officer Michael Yeadon, PhD:
Dose range finding for lethal outcomes
There are 4-5 different sets of lots … in the US showing this DRF [dose range finding] effect.
Worse, there is a quiet period between each of the lethal batches, the purpose of which is clearly baseline establishment.
…””the intentional killing of an unarmed or disarmed person by government agents acting in their authoritative capacity and pursuant to government policy or high command.”…
GET IT YET AMERICA? A CALL TO ARMS!