data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1a4b/e1a4b670c28863e8576d4b86819a22e931079f87" alt=""
http://www.lmschairman.org/2021/10/new-book-from-benedicts-peace-to.html
Not to be outdone, here is a moar better true solution:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5449e/5449e17c9f99d4937488151157a91aa4dca30c10" alt=""
http://www.lmschairman.org/2021/10/new-book-from-benedicts-peace-to.html
Not to be outdone, here is a moar better true solution:
Satan wants his Forerunner too like John the Baptist. We could call him Jorge the Unbaptizer.
What is to prevent a priest from simply doing a TLM while calling it a “Latin” N.O.? Wasn’t the original N.O. sold as nothing but some translation into the vernacular? Besides, if a man can self-identify as a woman, why can’t an TLM self-identify as a Latin N.O.? Or even better – the priest is simply improvising the L.N.O. to meet the local customs of the natives. How can Bergoglio argue against going native???