Ask your doctor if this is fake news, and ask yourself why no one is talking about it. They have been working on a SARS-Coronavirus vaccine since 2002. No dice in 19 years, yet they found one that is “safe and effective” in nine months? Hmmm. Do you understand that it is literally impossible to determine safety in nine months?
The tendency of coronavirus vaccines to harm the patient isn’t new… it is a well-known problem, and has been for years. You don’t have to dig deep into technical lab procedures nor medical terminology; it’s right there out in the open.
In this case, it’s the very title of the study:
The emergence of the disease SARS and the rapid identification of its severity and high risk for death prompted a rapid mobilization for control at the major sites of occurrence and at the international level. Part of this response was for development of vaccines for potential use in control, a potential facilitated by the rapid identification of the causative agent, a new coronavirus –. Applying the principles of infection control brought the epidemic under control but a concern for reemergence naturally or a deliberate release supported continuation of a vaccine development effort so as to have the knowledge and capability necessary for preparing and using an effective vaccine should a need arise. For this purpose, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases supported preparation of vaccines for evaluation for potential use in humans. This effort was hampered by the occurrence in the initial preclinical trial of an immunopathogenic-type lung disease among ferrets and Cynomolgus monkeys given a whole virus vaccine adjuvanted with alum and challenged with infectious SARS-CoV . That lung disease exhibited the characteristics of a Th2-type immunopathology with eosinophils in the lung sections suggesting hypersensitivity that was reminiscent of the descriptions of the Th2-type immunopathologic reaction in young children given an inactivated RSV vaccine and subsequently infected with naturally-occurring RSV –. Most of these children experienced severe disease with infection that led to a high frequency of hospitalizations; two children died from the infection , , . The conclusion from that experience was clear; RSV lung disease was enhanced by the prior vaccination.
In addition to the RSV experience, concern for an inappropriate response among persons vaccinated with a SARS-CoV vaccine emanated from experiences with coronavirus infections and disease in animals that included enhanced disease among infected animals vaccinated earlier with a coronavirus vaccine . Feline infectious peritonitis coronavirus (FIPV) is a well-known example of antibody-mediated enhanced uptake of virus in macrophages that disseminate and increase virus quantities that lead to enhanced disease , . Antigen-antibody complex formation with complement activation can also occur in that infection and some other coronavirus infections in animals. Thus, concern for safety of administering SARS-CoV vaccines to humans became an early concern in vaccine development...
A summary of the SARS-CoV vaccine evaluations in animal models (including the current report) that indicated an evaluation for immunopathology after challenge is presented in Table 2. …Th2-type immunopathology was seen after challenge of all vaccinated animals when evaluation for immunopathology was reported except the study in hamsters with a GSK whole virus vaccine… Thus, a Th2-type immunopathologic reaction on challenge of vaccinated animals has occurred in three of four animal models (not in hamsters) including two different inbred mouse strains with four different types of SARS-CoV vaccines with and without alum adjuvant. An inactivated vaccine preparation that does not induce this result in mice, ferrets and nonhuman primates has not been reported.
“This combined experience provides concern for trials with SARS-CoV vaccines in humans. Clinical trials with SARS coronavirus vaccines have been conducted and reported to induce antibody responses and to be “safe” , . However, the evidence for safety is for a short period of observation. The concern arising from the present report is for an immunopathologic reaction occurring among vaccinated individuals on exposure to infectious SARS-CoV, the basis for developing a vaccine for SARS. Additional safety concerns relate to effectiveness and safety against antigenic variants of SARS-CoV and for safety of vaccinated persons exposed to other coronaviruses…”
9 thoughts on “Not Conspiracy Theory, but Conspiracy FACT: “Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus””
I’m not an anti-vaxxer, I get a flu shot every year and have for a long time.
I do not want this biologic-agent, it is not a vaccine. It changes the way your body responds to Coronavirus, and the scientists who created it have no idea what that will mean. We ARE the clinical trials, anyone who gets the shot agrees to be part of the experiment. Even the medium it is in, Polyethylene glycol, a person can develop a sensitivity to it, and put themselves at risk for future shots. The jab teaches your body to attack spike proteins, but spike proteins create placentas and sperm.
The ADE is to me, the biggest threat. That your body will respond to a future exposure “in the wild” to Covid and develop a cytokine storm, a response that is so strong it does, in fact, kill you.
Same here, not a regular anti-vaxxer. This is the first year I haven’t gotten a flu shot in forever.
At least 72% of the population is believed to have anti PEG antibodies. So not much of the population would be able to handle the vaccine ingredients. ADE is indeed a huge concern.
The attack of the spike protein syncyctin-1 used for placental development, while worrying when taking the vaccine, is not conclusive. This is because the MRNA spike protein designed in the vaccine meant to target the virus and the sequence of our own spike proteins for placental development are different on a molecular level. They don’t have the same “signature” so the vaccine couldn’t crack the code to target our own cells in such a way.
If it were true, contracting the virus itself, in theory, could trigger infertility. This is all speculation though. At the end of the day, it can’t be trusted.
I’m not anti-vaxx either, I’ve gotten a flu shot for years even during pregnancy, and still won’t get this vaccine for a number of reasons…
The problem of cross-reactivity needs to be considered. There is no single uniform sequence for humans. There is a potential that mutations in syncyctin-1 could result in auto immune reactions in some people. This would of course be rare, and be dismissed as acceptable by those that want to promote to the shot. The fact is that we simply won’t know anything along these lines for years, and it is unconscionable that it is being promoted as safe and effective when neither of these statements are known. Given the fact that it was never demonstrated to prevent transmission, and that most healthy people will fully recover and some suffer such mild symptoms they need a test to determine if they are infected there is no significant benefit to an individual or group, and certainly not a benefit worth the risk. There are effective, cheap treatments (ivermectin and to a lesser extent HCQ) that have been available all along with well characterized decades long safety data.
@Tony Precisely. Couldn’t have said it better. We don’t know for sure and it’s not worth the risk. Period. Like now, the gardasil shot against cervicsl cancer is being investigated for a lot of adverse events. In a few years we’ll hear about all kinds of autoimmune and other events from people. If not now, later.
Always nice to have this handy reference:
Stay sharp, Mark
By the way, Ann has my email
All you “not anti-Baxter’s” might want to read Pamela Acker’s book, Vaccination, A Catholic perspective. Available from Kolbe center. After reading it you may opt out of vaccines forever.
Sorry, “anti-vaxxers” not anti- Baxter’s. Auto correct 😖
I kinda liked “anti-Baxter’s”…..it’s got a really nice ring to it….pretty sure I’m one of them 🙂
In all seriousness, there are very very VERY few vaccines I would ever consider taking at this point. Medicine, like every other institution on earth, has gotten waaay corrupt. And this wuhan red-death injection is as far from a legitimate vaccination (or legitimate medicine for that matter) as you can get.