— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 4, 2016
Skojec has a few thoughts HERE.
Look, anything that involves the use of menstrual blood, semen, breast milk and urine is virtually a guaranteed lock to be Satanic for real. It’s real. Do some research.
Oh wait, here she is in her own words. From the Skojec post:
Q:: “What place do you see the occult having within contemporary art; can magick be made (not simply appropriated/ performed)?” Marina Abramovic responded saying:
A: “Everything depends on which context you are doing what you are doing. If you are doing the occult magic in the context of art or in a gallery, then it is the art. If you are doing it in different context, in spiritual circles or private house or on TV shows, it is not art. The intention, the context for what is made, and where it is made defines what art is or not.”
Yep, context does matter. Like when the priest says the words of consecration at the altar in the context of Holy Mass, something miraculous happens. Should he do so outside the context of Mass, nothing happens. And I didn’t use this example by coincidence.
I would be willing to bet there is a whole lot more. When you have a group of people who think the law does not apply to them, while at the same time also not believing in any sort of higher moral order, what exactly would stop them from engaging in whatever sort of evil disgusting behavior they wanted? After getting away with shit for 30 years, the gravity of the acts would naturally descend into deeper and deeper depravity as the thrill of the crime, and the thrill of getting away with it, waned with each successive act.
Crimes of a deviant sexual nature are almost certainly part of this as well. Almost certainly. Money can buy you access to whatever you want. Charlie Sheen is an instructive case. His descent reached a point where he had committed every deviant act possible with every girl possible and the girls themselves became unexciting to him, to the point where he had to start banging dudes with breast implants. Yeah.
My gut tells me whatever is on the Weiner laptop is more deplorable (ha!) than we can possibly imagine, and we already know it involves the Clintons. There is no way, NO WAY, Comey reopens this case unless he personally viewed evidence that was incontrovertible. It’s also likely he had no choice anyway, because said evidence was about to be leaked either by his own agents or NYPD. I’m sure there are plenty of emails containing state secrets, probably proof of gross financial wrongdoing through the foundation, etc. However, none of it could be seen as incontrovertible at face value unless PICTURES.
Sort of a Weiner specialty, right?
Hang on tight, folks. Pray a lot.