11 thoughts on “It’s almost like there is an agenda or something…”
Thank God for the SSPX and if anyone from the higher-up at the SSPX is reading this… you need to appoint more bishops ASAP.
This latest TLM cancellation in Sweden, on the heels of Detroit, Charlotte, the FSSP getting kicked out of that diocese in SE France, etc. all point to a common denominator… antipope Prevost. Diocesan bishops wouldn’t take these brazen steps so hurriedly in a new papacy unless they knew they had the (anti) pope’s support.
Name one Catholic thing Prevost has done since stepping out on the loggia a couple months ago? Let’s start with keeping Kissy Fernandez. Think about how the secular and CINO media fawned all over him on day one: Pravda during the Stalin years was more believable. Think about what is now more than obvious: he was pre-chosen to succeed Bergoglio which means the conclave was a sham and thus, invalid.
I am still, unfortunately, a 2023 sedevacantist. Pope Benedict XVI, flawed as he was, was the last holy father.
Well done, Mark. You are demonstrating real courage in publicly calling out heresy. Amoris Latitia represents non-Catholic moral standards and tolerance for sin. Traditione Custodes is a declaration of war against the old Mass. If the old Mass was valid for more than 1500 years, it is valid now. AL and TC are both null and void.
Let us not be even mildly afraid of these “you are a” statements that end in either sedevacantist or neo-sedevacantist (that’s a new name for it, I believe). It’s more gaslighting from the normie crowd.
You don’t need my 2 cents recognizing you as a staunch faithful Catholic, but I say anyway, “Bravo, Non Veni Mark!” The more of us who stand up, and the more often we stand up, the less believable becomes The Big Lie (in reality, a whole flock of Big Lies). The pseudo-Catholic swamp is huge and full of foul creatures, many wearing Roman collars, but disinfecting sunlight is coming in larger and larger measure. Victory is assured. The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart is assured. The Just Judge cometh to cleanse the temple, the Church.
You can’t make this stuff up! Look at Steven O’Reilly’s biography. This is what I have long suspected about these antipope apologists: They are being paid to pretend to be orthodox Catholics. They are actually government Deep State. The first clue with Steven O’Reilly is that he lives in the Atlanta area, freemason central. Remember the 2020 steal?
“Steven O’Reilly is a graduate of the University of Dallas, and the Georgia Institute of Technology. He lives near Atlanta with his family. A FORMER INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, he has written apologetic articles for This Rock/Catholic Answers.” (emphasis mine) https://romalocutaest.com/about/
Catholics, please wake up! Who else graduated from University of Dallas? Taylor Marshall. Who else has that “look” of an intelligence worker/FBI/CIA? Taylor Marshall and many others. Now go their networks: One Peter Five; Crisis Magazine by fellow intelligence officer Eric Sammons, who also has that look of intelligence officer; Franciscan University, Inc; Catholic Answers.
Who did this network recently try to fire and take down? John-Henry Westen and LifeSiteNews. Why?
These are government funded intelligence operations, probably for data collection. And they all support the antipopes Bergoglio and Prevost.
A serious question about anti-popes and non-popes as applied to Robert Prevost. I see comments here and there referring to Prevost as an anti-pope. I was under the impression that what makes an anti-pope is invalid election while a valid pope remains alive and has not validly resigned. If this is true, then we need a different “title” for Prevost than anti-pope.
Some not too serious possibilities:
/ Pope Impersonator?
/ Non-Pope?
/ Nope Pope?
/ Black Smoke Pope?
/ Smoke and Mirrors Pope?
/ What Have You Been Smoking Lately Pope?
/ Try Again for Pope?
/ Irregular Pope?
/ Bergoglio Clone?
/ Son of Bergoglio?
/ Bergoglio Redux?
/ The Rigged Pope?
/ Snake Oil Pope?
/ All Appearance and No Substance Pope?
/ I Don’t Think So Pope?
/ Imaginary Pope?
/ Usurper Pope?
/ First in Line to Not Succeed St. Peter Pope?
/ Synodal Pope?
This could go on forever. But there is a serious need for an accurate term that describes a man who has usurped the Chair of Peter, yet is not an anti-pope. Or is he an anti-pope just because he’s not pope?
O’Reilly runs that Roma Locuta Est blog and contributed several articles in many places attemting to debunk “Benepapism” and defend Franky as a legitimate Pope.
He’s been called out several times on his errors where he typically buries the lead under paragraphs and paragraphs of chaff, selective sources, and pretzels of logic, all to avoid addressing the central and simplest of questions.
The last atrocious piece I read was on LifeSiteNews where it clearly quoted Monsignor Bux saying that Benedict believed his resignation allowed him to maintain some mystical task tied to the Papacy, but this insight was simply casually handwaved away and never addressed at all; just dismissed as Benedict keeping something unknown and insubstantial of the Papacy, but don’t worry, because he retained “nothing else”!
Thank God for the SSPX and if anyone from the higher-up at the SSPX is reading this… you need to appoint more bishops ASAP.
This latest TLM cancellation in Sweden, on the heels of Detroit, Charlotte, the FSSP getting kicked out of that diocese in SE France, etc. all point to a common denominator… antipope Prevost. Diocesan bishops wouldn’t take these brazen steps so hurriedly in a new papacy unless they knew they had the (anti) pope’s support.
Name one Catholic thing Prevost has done since stepping out on the loggia a couple months ago? Let’s start with keeping Kissy Fernandez. Think about how the secular and CINO media fawned all over him on day one: Pravda during the Stalin years was more believable. Think about what is now more than obvious: he was pre-chosen to succeed Bergoglio which means the conclave was a sham and thus, invalid.
I am still, unfortunately, a 2023 sedevacantist. Pope Benedict XVI, flawed as he was, was the last holy father.
Well done, Mark. You are demonstrating real courage in publicly calling out heresy. Amoris Latitia represents non-Catholic moral standards and tolerance for sin. Traditione Custodes is a declaration of war against the old Mass. If the old Mass was valid for more than 1500 years, it is valid now. AL and TC are both null and void.
Oh my, tensions or misunderstanding, stop the Mass!
Some Gothenburg history-
https://www.bbc.com/news/in-pictures-36428799
Let us not be even mildly afraid of these “you are a” statements that end in either sedevacantist or neo-sedevacantist (that’s a new name for it, I believe). It’s more gaslighting from the normie crowd.
You don’t need my 2 cents recognizing you as a staunch faithful Catholic, but I say anyway, “Bravo, Non Veni Mark!” The more of us who stand up, and the more often we stand up, the less believable becomes The Big Lie (in reality, a whole flock of Big Lies). The pseudo-Catholic swamp is huge and full of foul creatures, many wearing Roman collars, but disinfecting sunlight is coming in larger and larger measure. Victory is assured. The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart is assured. The Just Judge cometh to cleanse the temple, the Church.
You can’t make this stuff up! Look at Steven O’Reilly’s biography. This is what I have long suspected about these antipope apologists: They are being paid to pretend to be orthodox Catholics. They are actually government Deep State. The first clue with Steven O’Reilly is that he lives in the Atlanta area, freemason central. Remember the 2020 steal?
“Steven O’Reilly is a graduate of the University of Dallas, and the Georgia Institute of Technology. He lives near Atlanta with his family. A FORMER INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, he has written apologetic articles for This Rock/Catholic Answers.” (emphasis mine) https://romalocutaest.com/about/
Catholics, please wake up! Who else graduated from University of Dallas? Taylor Marshall. Who else has that “look” of an intelligence worker/FBI/CIA? Taylor Marshall and many others. Now go their networks: One Peter Five; Crisis Magazine by fellow intelligence officer Eric Sammons, who also has that look of intelligence officer; Franciscan University, Inc; Catholic Answers.
Who did this network recently try to fire and take down? John-Henry Westen and LifeSiteNews. Why?
These are government funded intelligence operations, probably for data collection. And they all support the antipopes Bergoglio and Prevost.
Nice job, Mark.
A serious question about anti-popes and non-popes as applied to Robert Prevost. I see comments here and there referring to Prevost as an anti-pope. I was under the impression that what makes an anti-pope is invalid election while a valid pope remains alive and has not validly resigned. If this is true, then we need a different “title” for Prevost than anti-pope.
Some not too serious possibilities:
/ Pope Impersonator?
/ Non-Pope?
/ Nope Pope?
/ Black Smoke Pope?
/ Smoke and Mirrors Pope?
/ What Have You Been Smoking Lately Pope?
/ Try Again for Pope?
/ Irregular Pope?
/ Bergoglio Clone?
/ Son of Bergoglio?
/ Bergoglio Redux?
/ The Rigged Pope?
/ Snake Oil Pope?
/ All Appearance and No Substance Pope?
/ I Don’t Think So Pope?
/ Imaginary Pope?
/ Usurper Pope?
/ First in Line to Not Succeed St. Peter Pope?
/ Synodal Pope?
This could go on forever. But there is a serious need for an accurate term that describes a man who has usurped the Chair of Peter, yet is not an anti-pope. Or is he an anti-pope just because he’s not pope?
I was asking the same question a couple of week ago. I’ve been going with “false pope”, and occasionally “CEO of the OVE (Occupied Vatican Entity)”.
Bravo, Mark!
I can hear Saint Little Tiny Princess clapping for her Papa!
After hitting the bullseye, I imagine this to be O’Reilly’s reaction…
file:///C:/Users/eazse/Downloads/MicrosoftWindows.Client.CBS_cw5n1h2txyewy!InputApp/DisgustedEwGIF.gif
O’Reilly runs that Roma Locuta Est blog and contributed several articles in many places attemting to debunk “Benepapism” and defend Franky as a legitimate Pope.
He’s been called out several times on his errors where he typically buries the lead under paragraphs and paragraphs of chaff, selective sources, and pretzels of logic, all to avoid addressing the central and simplest of questions.
The last atrocious piece I read was on LifeSiteNews where it clearly quoted Monsignor Bux saying that Benedict believed his resignation allowed him to maintain some mystical task tied to the Papacy, but this insight was simply casually handwaved away and never addressed at all; just dismissed as Benedict keeping something unknown and insubstantial of the Papacy, but don’t worry, because he retained “nothing else”!
But it pretty much refutes O’Reilly’s entire premise by demonstrating how Benedict’s own words and beliefs arguably introduced grounds for substantial error that would invalidate his resignation, even if Benedict believed in what he was doing!
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/benedict-xvis-own-words-show-that-he-really-did-resign-the-papacy/
O’Reilly is either very very lost or he is utterly intellectually dishonest. We have no choice but to assume he is an enemy.