No, John-Henry did NOT crash LifeSite’s audience by 72%… here is why

Does anyone remember what was going on in the 2020-2022 time period? Was there something like a purported pandemic where everyone was imprisoned and forced to work from home, right? On the internet all day. Weren’t there a few other things going on as well? Anything at all?

Add to that, monstrous lies being told in unison by MSM, including Fox News, gaslighting 24/7. Anyone suspecting that the real truth was something different than the narrative had to seek out alternate sources, and those sources were extremely limited. I am humbled to be counted among them.

I made my first call of bullshit on the purported pandemic on February 29, 2020. This was weeks before we even got to the Flatten the Curve hoax. But it didn’t stop there. In case you have forgotten, here is an incomplete list of the not-conspiracy theories covered here and by other select outlets, like Barnhardt.biz, NurseClaireSays.com, FLCCC/Dr Kory, Canon212.com, and… LifeSiteNews.com. Remember, these are all in the 2020-2022 era:

Covid lethality hoax

Social Distancing hoax

Masking hoax

Ventilator hoax

Vaccine hoax (it was somehow ready for human trials March 16th, 2020)

Vaccine as poison

Vaccine derived from abortion

History of Coronavirus vaccine failures/patient death

Original Antigenic Sin

mRNA hoax

ModeRNA hoax (had never produced a successful product, ever)

Ivermectin/Pony Paste

Hunter’s Laptop (Russia Disinformation hoax)

Stolen Election

J6 Insurrection hoax

Jab mandate disobedience, how to obtain an exemption

Remdesivir poison

Hell Mice (CRISPR biotech/aborted baby body parts)

Yay Ukraine hoax

Ukraine biolabs/Victoria Nuland

As I said, this is by no means an exhaustive list. Sorry I don’t have time to hotlink all these, but feel free to copy and paste into the search box on the right. The point here is that any website with a hitherto narrow/niche audience, but then became a much broader source of truth in the season of lies that was 2020-2022, saw its audience BOOM. LifeSiteNews, with certainty, rode that wave.

So for someone to say the decline in traffic is due to current management flying the thing into the ground like a Boeing with a DEI crew is nonsense. Your’s Truly has seen a 75% decline in daily traffic since that time as well.

Anyway, the new regime at LifeSite will reap what they’ve sown. Their blegging will accelerate, perhaps even surpassing 1P5. They won’t make it to the end of the year.

Godspeed, John-Henry.

30 thoughts on “No, John-Henry did NOT crash LifeSite’s audience by 72%… here is why”

  1. Again, my mentality is to see these things as vaguely good.

    LifeSite was cool, except, if indeed it was founded to be milquetoast Vatican II & deserves to circle the drain: Let it.

    Something better, this way comes. Same way I felt about Church Militant’s crash. CM did some good work & some bad, which led to natural selection – in a good way.

    1. I never followed Church Militant, but I suspect now in light of LifeSiteNews that it was another hit job by higher-ups in the anti-Church. Michael Voris made some extreme enemies. Church Militant with its sting operations targeting sodomite priests especially infuriated bishops.

      Just one example: Church Militant did a sting operation on a Polish pastor in Mobile in 2020. This young Polish priest [and likely partner of Archbishop Rodi] actually embezzled a huge amount of money from his parish to build a meet-up point for sodomites on parish grounds. https://www.complicitclergy.com/2020/11/20/watch-gay-priest-in-the-heart-of-dixie/

      Church Militant did a sting operation at the Marriott in Mobile. Archbishop Rodi was enraged at Church Militant because he had to PRETEND to be upset at the Polish priest’s actions. He gave him an extremely light punishment and kept his American work visa. Now that we have Antipope Prevost usurping the throne of Peter, Rodi obviously got permission to appoint this same Polish priest as a pastor once again in Mobile. These bishops think they can get away with this type of behavior now that they got rid of Church Militant.

      https://files.ecatholic.com/27961/documents/2025/5/priestassignmentstemplateMay232025.pdf?t=1748011506000

      1. CM did some good stuff, and their main personality relapsed into a lifestyle of active sodomy.

        MV had a tendency to partner up with some real narcissists though which showed a habitual lapse in judgement. Bringing Milo on was also a tremendous mistake as Milo never built a bridge he didn’t intend to nuke.

      2. You’re right but they won’t get by with it in the next life. . . . . it’s too bad they don’t believe in it – but they will when they are burning in hell.

  2. I think there is a Pro Life cult which is only about being anti abortion that doesnt want any religion attached to it. So it’s kind of ignorant because you can’t be pro life if you can’t be pro God. And you really can’t he pro God unless you’re Catholic. And you can’t he pro Catholic unless you become Catholic.

    Look at that Father Pavone. He dismissed his vocation to focus solely on the pro life crusade. He was less interested in bringing people to Jesus than he was opposing abortion. They go hand in hand. But it’s an industry, being anti abortion.

    Once the fulness of truth is presented, many people don’t want to accept it.

    1. This.

      That’s why even the most blatantly anti-Catholic clergy can still maintain popularity.

      “But at least he’s pro-life,” is Catholics lampooning themselves.

      Catholic clergy get zero points for opposing the deliberate killing of children. That barely makes one human.

  3. Right as usual. Remember when churches were closed but liquor stores stayed open? John-Henry will be just fine, I strongly suspect.

    1. Liquor stores, strip clubs, casinos, abortion mills… and of course, Walmart.

      Imagine having a real Catholic Vicar in 2020. One who defied lockdowns and forcefully demanded the churches remain open. The entire COVID op would have gone down in flames.

      How very fortunate that they had Jorge. What luck.

  4. The apostate sodomite usurpers are enraged right now that they could not trick Catholics into accepting Antipope Prevost as “Leo XIV the Conservative” and that this LifeSiteNews firing of John-Westen Henry has blown up in their faces.

    Today Frank Walker reported on Canon212: “Vicar of Woke Gets Hand-Delivered Genealogy Report” https://x.com/chrisjollyhale/status/1943459403140579363

    Isn’t the timing convenient? Antipope Prevost supposedly was very excited about the report.

    Ann Barnhardt predicted this very early on. From May 9:

    https://www.barnhardt.biz/2025/05/09/l14-is-black-his-grandparents-were-black-mulatto-creole-now-expect-to-be-called-raaayciss-for-any-critique/

    1. My understanding of the term “antipope” suggests an invalid rival claimant. Is that incorrect?

      Seems like we should be using the term “false pope” at this stage.

      Just putting the question out there.

      1. The definition on Catholic Encyclopedia is that there has to be a rival claimant to the throne, but I don’t think that is correct because we are in uncharted waters. Every previous antipope before Bergoglio and Prevost was actually Catholic. We have never had an apostate manage to usurp the throne in Rome.

        1. That’s why I was asking. There have been several dozen declared antipopes, but never a declared “false pope”.

          The unprecedented nature of our current situation (whether one believes we’re on our second fugazi or our seventh) seems to merit its own separate and distinct title.

  5. “flying the thing into the ground like a Boeing with a DEI crew”

    Savage.

    Good to hear more Catholics talk like this.

  6. Apart from all of this, I would be willing to bet that Lifesite got a big bump in the 2018 “summer of shame” as so many other sites did, which petered off with the covid putsch. That was when Steve Skojec got fat and happy, before his apostasy.

  7. I don’t think ((they)) care if Lifesite crashes and burns; in fact I think it’s exactly what they want..
    That’s what they wanted for Project Veritas, and that’s what they want for any board controlled Catholic venue getting too close to tradition, the truth about the papacy and the jews.
    So it’s good for them if they can corral the naïve faithful into strict Novus Ordo /Leo-land, but better yet if none of it exists.

  8. Both Westen and Jalsevac have been peddling Russian propaganda. There is nothing pro-life about supporting Russian terrorism. They both need to go.

    1. What’s wrong with the Russian propaganda?

      All the Russians do is expose the American/NATO/Ukie propaganda by continuing to take over Ukraine oblast by oblast and point out how the Ukie’s Banderista troops like wearing swastikas, and that the people of Crimea, Donyetsk and Lugansk and the Eastern Orthodox Churchs are happy the Russians are finally protecting them from Banderite aggression.

      What do you have?

      A blown up Nord Stream pipeline? A shot-down Malaysian Airlines passenger jet? A broken Minsk Agreement that bought you resupply time? A crusing street van surprise draft campaign?

      I think you need to sign up. Unofficial officially unaffiliate mercenary outfits are recruiting! Just make sure to leave your passport at home so you are not identified as fighting on your country’s behalf. Zelensky will welcome you with a hug!

      1. Can I remind you that Our Lady said that Russia will be the instrument of chastisement? Are you sure that most of alternative media is not funded by Russian agents? Like perhaps all the race-baiting and white nationalism. Are you really sure that if Europe gives up Ukraine, Vlad will stand down and be peaceful, rather than march into Western Europe? Are these impressions your own or not ideas planted by propaganda? that Imagine all Russia had to do to win the Cold War and disband NATO was fight by toying with people’s minds.

        I am old enough to remember when Russia was considered the bad guys. Now, after a 180 degree turn, they will save us from Satanic globalists. Do you think an article labeled that it is written by John Smith with a picture of an American is assurance enough that John Smith wrote it and not some fat guy named Boris?

        1. Apply that same critical thinking to any notion that the NATO puppets raking in the US greenbacks while feeding Ukraine’s male population into the meat grinder are the “good guys”. The idea is every bit as absurd and obscene as the rebranding of reformed-Bolshevik Putin as the savior of Christendom.

          There are no good guys in this thing. There’s only the global kakistocracy, the hidden hand that rules them, and their victims.

          1. Russia is part of the NWO movement. It played along with the clotshot and is working towards a CBDC. I just find it a lucky coincidence that all so-called populists either admire or support, directly or indirectly, Russia. I just find it odd the instrument of chastisement is now the nation chosen by God to save the world.

          2. People still need to believe in good guys. I kind of get it, even if it’s completely irrational.

          3. T, regardless of what part Russia plays in the conspiracy game (Russia is a secular democracy that has adopted many liberal errors and murders it’s unborn – OF COURSE it is going to be EVIL and do the same evils as the West!), the Truth remains the Truth.

            The NWO is a house divided and infighting is the normal state of affairs as to who rules and whose vision of a godless world comes to fruition. In this specific case, it is NATO that is aggressively acting against Russia, and the West that funds all manner of immorality abroad disguised as ‘aid.’ Even amongst criminals while some have a limit to what they’ll do, there are always those willing to go further than others.

        2. An instrument of chastisement… against whom?

          Who is being chastised, Mr. T ? And why?

          Do you suppose the chastisees deserve it?

          Did you factor that into your conspiracy theories, Mr. T ?

          Given the present circumstances, the clowns running NATO have given Vladimir every reason to invade Europe, just like they gave him every legitimate reason to finally invade the aggressive Ukraine whose government Victoria Newland overthrew via another USAID funded color revolution.

          They also actually WANT him to! Which is why they keep provoking him, and he kept hesitating to intervene in the Ukrainian agression against the ethnic Russians in the breakaway provinces. Until Ukraine joining NATO became a real possibility.

          So instead of all these vague R-U-Sure suspicions you cast about Russia, how about we talk facts, hmmmm?

          I’ve been following the Fatima messages since childhood, and the presumption was always that Russia were the baddies, and in many cases, they were and are… But the Ukranian fiasco ain’t one of them. And I’d sooner trust Vladimir over the entire blackmailable pedophile United States political hierarchy, any time, any day.

          You should remind yourself that the Fatima seer also said point blank that America would become Communist. Russia indeed spread her errors, but it wouldn’t have succeeded unless the USA made itself fertile ground for them to succeed, and neither can the USA shrug off the responsibility for it’s sins that cry out to Heavenn for vengeance.

          And God has chosen Russia for the task of kicking America and Europe’s collective ass.

          Don’t like it? Take it up with Him.

          1. I don’t think anyone is the good guy, but it’s credible that Russian money goes towards funding funding any group that can be done to destabilize their opponent’s government, and they’ve been doing it for at least a decade. If Russia does go onto cream Europe and not declaring peace once they’ve annexed Ukraine, I hope you’ll have some skepticism to the voices who are always justifying Putin. There is indeed evidence (evidence, not proof) that they’ve been financing populists all over the West.

            God is also using Satan to test the world but I hope you don’t support him as God’s anointed.

          2. Maybe you’re not getting me. Countries are contesting over who will run the NWO. They’re all evil. But that does not mean Russia will not invade and massacre Europe or that he hasn’t been fighting an information war for decades.

            Putin had the chance to call BS on the whole pandemic, so why didn’t he? Why didn’t he call out the West, who are seemingly his opponents?

            Why is the Russian financial system also making progress with digital IDs and cashless currency. Isn’t this Satanic, which Putin wouldn’t stand for?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.