Does anyone remember what was going on in the 2020-2022 time period? Was there something like a purported pandemic where everyone was imprisoned and forced to work from home, right? On the internet all day. Weren’t there a few other things going on as well? Anything at all?
Add to that, monstrous lies being told in unison by MSM, including Fox News, gaslighting 24/7. Anyone suspecting that the real truth was something different than the narrative had to seek out alternate sources, and those sources were extremely limited. I am humbled to be counted among them.
I made my first call of bullshit on the purported pandemic on February 29, 2020. This was weeks before we even got to the Flatten the Curve hoax. But it didn’t stop there. In case you have forgotten, here is an incomplete list of the not-conspiracy theories covered here and by other select outlets, like Barnhardt.biz, NurseClaireSays.com, FLCCC/Dr Kory, Canon212.com, and… LifeSiteNews.com. Remember, these are all in the 2020-2022 era:
Covid lethality hoax
Social Distancing hoax
Masking hoax
Ventilator hoax
Vaccine hoax (it was somehow ready for human trials March 16th, 2020)
Vaccine as poison
Vaccine derived from abortion
History of Coronavirus vaccine failures/patient death
Original Antigenic Sin
mRNA hoax
ModeRNA hoax (had never produced a successful product, ever)
Ivermectin/Pony Paste
Hunter’s Laptop (Russia Disinformation hoax)
Stolen Election
J6 Insurrection hoax
Jab mandate disobedience, how to obtain an exemption
Remdesivir poison
Hell Mice (CRISPR biotech/aborted baby body parts)
Yay Ukraine hoax
Ukraine biolabs/Victoria Nuland
As I said, this is by no means an exhaustive list. Sorry I don’t have time to hotlink all these, but feel free to copy and paste into the search box on the right. The point here is that any website with a hitherto narrow/niche audience, but then became a much broader source of truth in the season of lies that was 2020-2022, saw its audience BOOM. LifeSiteNews, with certainty, rode that wave.
So for someone to say the decline in traffic is due to current management flying the thing into the ground like a Boeing with a DEI crew is nonsense. Your’s Truly has seen a 75% decline in daily traffic since that time as well.
Anyway, the new regime at LifeSite will reap what they’ve sown. Their blegging will accelerate, perhaps even surpassing 1P5. They won’t make it to the end of the year.
Godspeed, John-Henry.
Again, my mentality is to see these things as vaguely good.
LifeSite was cool, except, if indeed it was founded to be milquetoast Vatican II & deserves to circle the drain: Let it.
Something better, this way comes. Same way I felt about Church Militant’s crash. CM did some good work & some bad, which led to natural selection – in a good way.
I never followed Church Militant, but I suspect now in light of LifeSiteNews that it was another hit job by higher-ups in the anti-Church. Michael Voris made some extreme enemies. Church Militant with its sting operations targeting sodomite priests especially infuriated bishops.
Just one example: Church Militant did a sting operation on a Polish pastor in Mobile in 2020. This young Polish priest [and likely partner of Archbishop Rodi] actually embezzled a huge amount of money from his parish to build a meet-up point for sodomites on parish grounds. https://www.complicitclergy.com/2020/11/20/watch-gay-priest-in-the-heart-of-dixie/
Church Militant did a sting operation at the Marriott in Mobile. Archbishop Rodi was enraged at Church Militant because he had to PRETEND to be upset at the Polish priest’s actions. He gave him an extremely light punishment and kept his American work visa. Now that we have Antipope Prevost usurping the throne of Peter, Rodi obviously got permission to appoint this same Polish priest as a pastor once again in Mobile. These bishops think they can get away with this type of behavior now that they got rid of Church Militant.
https://files.ecatholic.com/27961/documents/2025/5/priestassignmentstemplateMay232025.pdf?t=1748011506000
CM did some good stuff, and their main personality relapsed into a lifestyle of active sodomy.
MV had a tendency to partner up with some real narcissists though which showed a habitual lapse in judgement. Bringing Milo on was also a tremendous mistake as Milo never built a bridge he didn’t intend to nuke.
You’re right but they won’t get by with it in the next life. . . . . it’s too bad they don’t believe in it – but they will when they are burning in hell.
I think there is a Pro Life cult which is only about being anti abortion that doesnt want any religion attached to it. So it’s kind of ignorant because you can’t be pro life if you can’t be pro God. And you really can’t he pro God unless you’re Catholic. And you can’t he pro Catholic unless you become Catholic.
Look at that Father Pavone. He dismissed his vocation to focus solely on the pro life crusade. He was less interested in bringing people to Jesus than he was opposing abortion. They go hand in hand. But it’s an industry, being anti abortion.
Once the fulness of truth is presented, many people don’t want to accept it.
Right as usual. Remember when churches were closed but liquor stores stayed open? John-Henry will be just fine, I strongly suspect.
Liquor stores, strip clubs, casinos, abortion mills… and of course, Walmart.
Imagine having a real Catholic Vicar in 2020. One who defied lockdowns and forcefully demanded the churches remain open. The entire COVID op would have gone down in flames.
How very fortunate that they had Jorge. What luck.
The apostate sodomite usurpers are enraged right now that they could not trick Catholics into accepting Antipope Prevost as “Leo XIV the Conservative” and that this LifeSiteNews firing of John-Westen Henry has blown up in their faces.
Today Frank Walker reported on Canon212: “Vicar of Woke Gets Hand-Delivered Genealogy Report” https://x.com/chrisjollyhale/status/1943459403140579363
Isn’t the timing convenient? Antipope Prevost supposedly was very excited about the report.
Ann Barnhardt predicted this very early on. From May 9:
https://www.barnhardt.biz/2025/05/09/l14-is-black-his-grandparents-were-black-mulatto-creole-now-expect-to-be-called-raaayciss-for-any-critique/
My understanding of the term “antipope” suggests an invalid rival claimant. Is that incorrect?
Seems like we should be using the term “false pope” at this stage.
Just putting the question out there.
The definition on Catholic Encyclopedia is that there has to be a rival claimant to the throne, but I don’t think that is correct because we are in uncharted waters. Every previous antipope before Bergoglio and Prevost was actually Catholic. We have never had an apostate manage to usurp the throne in Rome.
That’s why I was asking. There have been several dozen declared antipopes, but never a declared “false pope”.
The unprecedented nature of our current situation (whether one believes we’re on our second fugazi or our seventh) seems to merit its own separate and distinct title.
Word.
“flying the thing into the ground like a Boeing with a DEI crew”
Savage.
Good to hear more Catholics talk like this.
Apart from all of this, I would be willing to bet that Lifesite got a big bump in the 2018 “summer of shame” as so many other sites did, which petered off with the covid putsch. That was when Steve Skojec got fat and happy, before his apostasy.