Across the transom. This is from a long time Trad priest who is known to me, currently affiliated with one of the Ecclesia Dei communities. It is brief and to the point. He wishes to remain anon for this post, but I can’t help but encourage it be shared with other “full communion” priests in those orders, and their lay faithful, with the knowledge that this is written by one of their own (NOT a Sede priest). The crux of his argument: Since it is already quite evident we are dealing with another heretic on the seat, is no one concerned for the soul of Robert Prevost? Well, why the hell not? His soul is in danger. Does Fraternal Charity not compel us to call this out? Isn’t it for his own good? You’re not crazy for hearing and seeing what is plain to hear and see from Hagan Leo 14. As our Lord said, “Go and relate to John what you have heard and seen.” (Matt 11:4, Luke 7:22) -nvp
Mark, forgive me for dumping this on your desk, but I thought NVP could expose a glaring lacuna in Trad Inc. media. Here goes:
Why aren’t Catholics and, in particular, Catholic influencers calling a spade a spade? Here’s what I mean. When an authority in the Church fails freely, consciously and gravely in his duty to shepherd his flock and promote and protect the true good of souls and the true interests of Our Lord and His Church, he is gravely dishonoring Our Lord and harming the Church and souls.
Why, then, isn’t this grave dereliction of duty called plainly what it is, namely, mortal sin, worthy of eternal damnation for him who commits it and who leaves this world unrepentant. The more weighty his responsibility and lofty his position in the hierarchy, the greater will be his eternal punishment. Is this truth just too hard for them to handle?
Perhaps you could consider calling out Trad Inc. media for their strange timidity. We’re not looking at a hierarchy today that exists for our entertainment. Nor is the hierarchy merely and innocently playing politics or making administrative blunders or, for that matter, blowing us away with crafty moves akin to some holy game of 5-D chess. No, we’re dealing here with effectively evil prelates and pastors sliding headlong into the eternal abyss of Hell-fire and brimstone awaiting them.
Simple and obvious case in point: Pope Leo XIV’s continuing to keep the heretical and perverted Cardinal Victor Manuel “Tucho” Fernandez in his curial position as prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith.
I need not illustrate the obvious eternal consequences for the soul of Pope Leo XIV. Any man of solid Catholic understanding knows the unpleasant outcome. Horror, anyone? Is no one horrified at the prospect of Leo‘s damnation? Is there anyone out there in Catholic media? Hello?
Sincerely,
X
“Why aren’t Catholics and, in particular, Catholic influencers calling a spade a spade?”
They do not do this because they are controlled/false opposition. This should not surprise us by this point. We could also make the case that Trad Inc suffers from the same affliction as all these clergy: APOSTASY. If the Church is experiencing apostasy (from the top-down), then that will inevitably affect Trad Inc and every other timid Catholic. We’ve already seen as much with the likes of Steve Skojec.
Let us pray and work for an alternative disposition.
So true. Lifesitenews articles on Ukraine are drawn from the speeches of Vladimir Putin. They also support Russian foreign policy. Painful to read. I did a search the other day for the word ‘Russia’ on the Fatima Center website. The latest article was in 2022. Father Gruner must be rolling in his grave. I doubt most Catholics are aware because they are trusting traditional Catholic sources and not reading anything else because we have been ghettoized. Some of this is our own doing. We have isolated ourselves to an extent in disgust with the state of the world.
And what “policy” do you prefer they support on Ukraine?
The Banderists’?
The Americans’?
The Jews’…?
Take for instance an article like this:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/has-russia-now-become-the-defender-of-western-civilization/
It quotes Aleksandr Dugin saying
Putin is no longer our old Soviet enemy but says nothing more about him.
Contrast this with the following with more detail including actual quotes from his books and speeches.
https://jrnyquist.blog/2022/06/20/twilight-of-the-magicians-aleksandr-dugin-and-the-war-against-the-west
This man is the thinker behind the invasion. He threatens the existence of your nation. The article also makes reference to the convergence of the right and the left in western politics and culture which was what I and the original poster said, albeit so briefly. Dugin has praised Curtis Yarvin who JD Vance was quoting as an influence of his last summer.
The writer of this lifesite article presents this one statement and leaves out information that would set any Catholic on their heels, information they could acquire after a fifteen minute Google search. Why?
I will finish by saying it was the Consecration of Russia Our Lady requested. She did not say, ‘America will spread her errors throughout the world causing wars’ etc…
The consecration had to have happened by 1960. That is what Jesus told Lucia and John XXIII refused to do. The errors are already committed.
Russia itself is lost to Orthodoxy, which is not a small thing, and the end of the world will be due to communism planted by Russia which turned into the one world anti Christ government we will soon have.
Several things:
-LifeSiteNews did not write the article.
– It is an independent opinion piece originating elsewhere that Steve Jalsevac shared with LifeSite readers as another perspective.
– The article is basically asking a question.
– There doesn’t seem to be anything off with regards to the article briefly quoting Dugin about Putin. What specific problem do you have?
– Did you read the article? If so, what specific problem do you have with it overall?
– You are aware that Sr. Lucia said America would become communist as a consequence of the failure to consecrate Russia, yes?
– You are aware that our Lady of Fatima said that God would use Russia to punish the world, implying that the world as a whole was at fault, yes?
– You are aware that both Russia and America were utilizing the same propaganda and terrorist tactics against each other and in each other’s spheres of influence, yes?
– Yet God willed that it be Russia that be consecrated, implying that Russia’s conversion would be His vehicle to bless the entire world with a period of peace, further implying a shift of power to the East, obviously to Catholicism and unity with Rome. God did not choose America. Why is that?
– Once again, whose “policy” do you support on Ukraine if not Russia’s, and why?
And they just fired John Henry Weston…
My first thought is that, by the very fact this indult priest is an indult priest, he’s necessarily guilty of the same timidity he observes in Trad Inc. media (ie., approval is conditional upon good behavior, that is, self-censorship).
That aside, I think Trad Inc. (which is really a misnomer: It should be called Conservative Inc) really got shook up by the simultaneous heresies of Francis, and the staggering growth of sedevacantism, such that their reaction was to see in whosoever should become the next conciliar claimant, not only a true pope, but one we should all rally to….to escape the sede boogeymen. For such were the fears of sede vacante, the conservatives having not the doctrinal acumen to see in this obvious reality the salvation of the Church, but instead the opposite, that they were willing to make any heretic in white a true pope, and even a traditional one.
Of course, the irony is that it never occurs to them to consider how the credibility of the Catholic religion can survive (or what it makes of Christ’s promise), if alleged popes can teach heresy by the handful in their official magisterium, or how one cut off from the Church for public heresy can nevertheless be its pope. Instead, their terror is reserved for the usual sophisms (eg., If sedevacantism is true, you have destroyed apostolicity, visibility, indefectibility, etc), all of which are easily rebutted…unless a priori you have predetermined not to hear the explanations for fear of the conclusion (which given the explanations, would no longer be fearful).
Recently my unrepentant Protestant Aunt died and my faithful Mother and Father prayed the divine mercy chaplet for her soul while sick and dying. They fully trust that Jesus came to escort her into His Heavenly Kingdom, purgatory or straight to the show. It is possible that some faithful Catholics think evangelization, conversion, penance and confession is not necessary and instead their prayers will help save these heretics.
While it’s heresy to believe the unrepentant sinner can be saved, and dereliction of duty to cease reasonable efforts to save them – it is NEVER wrong to pray for the dead. Or the living.
I find it difficult to pray for people who fail “consciously” in their duty, as Father said, but ok, I’ll say an Ave.
The laity calling out other laity won’t accomplish much, if anything. How about “father” doing it…and not anonymously? I guess being an ED priest, it would be costly though.
He is a priest. Why isn’t he doing more in his position? We aren’t talking about defying the Church, but he can speak out. He can organize priests to voice concerns. He can speak about it to his flock. I mean, influencers don’t really reach that many people. He has a tremendous opportunity.
Does anyone see the problem here?
The priest rightly complains: “Why aren’t Catholics and, in particular, Catholic influencers calling a spade a spade?”
Mark describes the same priest: “He wishes to remain anon for this post.”
This is why we are now in our twelfth year of apostate antipopes. No priest is willing to lose his job and salary and influence. Stop being anonymous and be willing to martyr yourself. If only 10% of priests would do this, everything would turn around.
100% correct.
As a man who hasn’t worked in years and will soon be homeless I can understand why a priest would want to keep his job. But if we can’t depend on the shepherds to protect the flock….
None of us reading this knows why the author has chosen to be anonymous. Rather than dismiss him for his anonymity, we should focus the discussion instead on what he has to say, and that is the very real possibility that Robert Prevost may very well be on the road to hell by not un-doing the serious damage that antipope Bergoglio did. Even if Prevost is an antipope, and I’ve come to the personal conclusion he is, he could use his antipapacy to at minimum, get rid of Kissy Fernandez. Keeping that guy around is like having cirrhosis of the liver and drinking a bottle of Jack Daniel’s every night! Hell, prior to Bergoglio, at least all the antipopes were Catholics. Prevost at this point after just two short months, is looking like another Bergoglio but one of higher intelligence, manners and curb appeal. And where does that lead? Well, just look at how fast Bergoglio’s body started to decompose while he was “laying in state” at the Vatican.
The door to Bergoglio’s antipapacy, subsequent heresy, Pachamama demon worship and then Prevost was kicked open by Benedict XVI, the modernist who helped bring Vatican 2 to the masses, then tried to control the damage and then ultimately pushed it to its logical end with the half / no resignation.
Germans.
OK, that’s a valid point. Pope Benedict made many terrible and tragic mistakes, the worst of which was fake-resigning the papacy, allowing in a satanic antipope. Both Benedict and Antipope Bergoglio are dead now. What we have is a man on the chair of St. Peter right now whose soul is in serious danger by his in-actions. Is he the pope? I don’t think he is but my personal opinion aside, his soul is bound for hell and to the author’s point here, hardly anyone in the Catholic media seems to be concerned about his eternal salvation.
“was kicked open by Benedict XVI, the modernist who helped bring Vatican 2 to the masses, then tried to control the damage and then ultimately pushed it to its logical end with the half / no resignation.”
Modernism, the synthesis of all heresies, says Pope St. Pius x. And yet BXVI is given a,pass to the title antipope. Unbelievable.
A failed Catholic convert here.
I’ve notice the fatal flaw in most Catholics in that they cannot recognize any other form of authority than the Pope, the Vatican, and the power that flows from it.
I ask: from whence does their authority come from? Currently, Vatican II. Is Vatican II faithful to the traditions, doctrines, and commands that trace back to Jesus Christ himself? Of course not.
Therefore: It is safe for Catholics to abandon Rome and its claims of authority as the entire leadership has abandoned their faith and obligations. The new untouchable authority must be adherence to the Council of Trent. It is already secured in History and cannot be toyed with, as Vatican II can and is. The idea that a local church or priest is illegitimate if he is not in good standing with Rome is absurd. A higher and transcendental standard exists and all we have to do is declare it. If modern Catholics can’t let go of their idols, then let them go. I’d be OK if the Roman Catholic Church collapsed to 10% of its current size. Give me a small fighting CRUSADER Catholic Church that has a hard core over the bloated and soft mess that it is today.
Forget proselytizing in the 3rd World. Let them seek out Christ or return to their native deities. The Roman Catholic Church needs to first cleanse itself. Then go on an unrelenting CRUSADE to clean out its native base: Europe. It won’t be peaceful, pretty, or democratic. Hallelujah.
“I’d be OK if the Roman Catholic Church collapsed to 10% of its current size. Give me a small fighting CRUSADER Catholic Church that has a hard core over the bloated and soft mess that it is today.”
That small percentage, probably smaller than 10% are the sedevacantists. Look into it.
Some of them, not all, are enemies of God and friends of the original homicide.And, they are promised that they will be made overlords of gehenne and that their reward & status will be commensurate with the number of souls they drag, dupe & deceive into eternal perdition. This is why, some of them, do not repent, but rather adhere with obduracy to itheir mpenitence, and die sans Sacraments.
Your friend is a layman and not a priest; the Montini / Bugnini ‘sacrament’ of holy orders (1968) is wholly invalid. At least one of those men was in the class of monster outlined above.
I believe the many modern day Eucharistic Miracles are God’s reassurance that He has not abandoned us by giving us invalidly ordained priests. The NO Mass and new rite prayers and Sacraments are lacking but not invalid. One only has to attend daily NO Mass for a time to realise the difference in the level of grace compared to when rarely making it to daily Mass, (even though it isn’t the TLM)…speaking from my own experience.
I used to think precisely the same thing and, perhaps, God – on occasion – suspends supernatural law to provide for such. Perhaps, however on paper, the Montini ‘sacramental’ rites are wholly, utterly and ostensibly invalid. This is absolutely certain and observably so by any honest reading.
Remember that demons can perform acts which appear miraculous; e.g. Moses and the witch doctors, who turned their staffs into serpents.
If you attend the FSSP ‘Mass’, stop it! Get, if not elsewhere, to the SSPX as their priests (on the whole) and thus Sacraments, are valid.
The NO also has efficacious exorcisms. It’s hard to dismiss that by saying the demons are tricking themselves out of the possessed/oppressed. And Cekada’s argumentation for the invalidity of NO orders is thin, and I’ve studied both of his treatments. To me it reads more like cult indoctrination. Sedes are welcome here, I treat them as Catholics, I acknowledge their orders and sacraments are valid. But disparagement will lead to banishment, FYI.
You are mistaken. Fr. Cekada’s treatment, amongst others, is nothing of the sort; it is so obvious that one feels like screaming “WHAT IS WRING WITH YOU PEOPLE” who reject it.
It is clear-cut. That the NO ‘sacrament’ of episcopal consecration is valid is not even arguable. And from it cone all the sacraments that require priestly input.
Anyone reading this and uncertain, worried or concerned – as you ought to be! – go to the Introibo ad Altare Dei blog and ask the people there to assist in a proper explanation of these (vitally important) matters. Your soul likely depends on it.
Don’t worry about the ban, I’m gone.
Does it not give you pause that other reasonable people disagree on a matter you consider to be “so obvious” ?? And I am talking about people who have studied the issue. Why isn’t the whole world all Sede, even as it were once all Arian?
Because that is part of the punishment: being cuckolded in a false church. How the likes of Bergoglio must’ve laughed at ‘clericalism’; that is what they used – and still exploit to keep people beholden to the wolves. This is God’s punishment on an unfaithful people.
If you have read Fr. Cekada’s tract(s) and disagree with what is argued therein you are mistaken and I don’t have time to explain it to you; however I will say that you can find online, via the old magazine website that Fr. Luigi Vella (? spelling) set up, 4 correspondences between Bugnini and his PII lodge master, where he, Bugnini, was given the assignment of destroying the physical Church, its Sacraments, liturgy & music. Fr. Vella was given the assignment of investigating ecclesiastical Freemasonry by PXII and was instructed by Saintly Padre Pio.
Further, Bugnini, who was in charge of Montini’s ‘reimagined sacraments’, probably based that of bishop ordination on the Anglican ‘rite’, which Leo XIII had condemned some 50-60 years earlier when he was asked by the Anglican heretics to evaluate it.
Importantly, had PXII not stipulated with precision & clarity exactly what the formula for episcopal ordination must contain, a mere 20 odd years earlier, it is arguable that Montini’s ‘sacrament’ might remain valid – doubtful but arguable – however, given that he DID specify, Montini’s new formula (amongst other things, e.g. it’s ambiguity of terminology) falls patently outside PXII’s explicit requirements.
And not by chance. This cut off the ‘Apostolic pipeline’ – from which all priestly effected Sacraments flow – and, with the passage of time, in the ‘formal’ or hierarchical (erstwhile) Church structure, in the Roman Rite, there are no longer any bishops and thus very few valid priests. I think there are 4 Cardinals who are valid priests (i.e. ordained before 1968), though there would be not one bishop left alive in the hierarchical Roman Rite Church. Things are so much very worse than most can imagine.
The eastern rites were not fiddled with until 1990, they might have some valid bishops left.
Bear in mind, as Pope St. Pius X gave witness, no one, not even the Church Herself, can validly change the Sacraments.
And before I go, I have seen the missing Fatima secret. It has been online, hidden in plain view, so to speak, for 15 years. This has been analysed as Sr. Lucia’s hand-writing and it tells of the false NO Church, which Our Lady has warned of since the 17th Century (OL Good Success). It tells that, as with Israel, the Faith will be taken away from Rome and given to another people (Portugal); that St. Peter’s must be destroyed and that Rome itself, if it continues in its apostasy, will itself be destroyed by 2029, 100 years after the Lateran Treaty. The Vatican II Sect know this to be authentic, and complied with a strict order given therein, that the cornerstone of St. Peter’s tomb be moved to Fatima during the “no reignardo” of JPII. This occurred in Sep. 2004.
The Vatican Third Secret is also valid, and also written by Sr. Lucia though, for some reason, in a disguised hand. It has been analysed and confirmed as her writing and there are historical records of both secrets and their envelopes and they match what information was gleaned from them in decades past.
I mention this because the hidden secret mentioned above speaks of the false NO Church and the revealed Vatican Secret speaks to the actual Church and suggests that it is in Sedevacante (the symbol of a dead pope) and a state of ruin. Only a remnant remains and this is the Sedevacante Communities – we are all that remains of the (Roman) visible Church.
Further, ‘Akita’ is the phonetic equivalent of the Portuguese for “here it (or she) is” and the principal message given there was that ‘all that will remain is devotion to my Immaculate Heart and the Sign left by my Son’ and these are represented in the Vatican Secret (i.e the Cross and the flames that would destroy the world but which dissipated upon touching Our Lady). As Mr. David Nix recently postulated, ‘the only arms that will remain for you…’ does indeed mean that, broadly, there will be no Sacraments.
Things are very much more dire than one can easily fathom.
Mark, “…why isn’t the whole world sede…’
Maybe because Our Lord asks if He’ll find faith when He returns,? If we are nearing the rule of the AC, it makes total sense there would be few Catholics AND the Church would be without it’s earthly head, the pope. If we had a valid pope, he, with Christ’s help would fight him tooth and nail.
As if the SSPX is free of NO priest and compromise. Thats laughable.
In addition to other continuing reasons to believe both confessions and the Eucharist of the NO valid, I will personally testify to receiving an inner locution (accompanied by additional indicators) when I first understood the deficiencies of the NO and had worked myself into a tizzy about attendance.
“I have permitted it (the NO) for a time because of your (pl) lack of faith. Do not lay on heavier burdens (attendance of the Mass rather than the NO) than I have commanded (through the Church).”
Accompanied by the non-locutive communication that I was to keep my nose down and work harder on my own personal sins and deficiencies of virtue.
I can affirm, I’ve been led on this same path.
My experience has been the same, for 53 years. Novus ordo Mass, and frequent NO Sacrament of Penance have been sources of significant grace in my life. I have struggled more for sanctity without them.
But nothing beats the Mass of the Ages for grace.
I have infrequent access to the Tridentine mass and attend a reverent NO each week. The Tridentine is absolutely beautiful and yes better than even the nicest NO mass. But my children need the sacraments and my husband and I need to lead by example. To catechize them at home but not go to mass would be foolish on my part. You do the best you can. Despite its flaws I can tell you the majority of parishioners at my home parish take their faith seriously, despite it being NO.
This is because you have made a perfect Act of Contrition and spiritual Communions and almighty God in His mercy has showered blessings upon you.
It is not because the NO ‘priests’ or ‘sacraments’ are valid; they are invalid, but God’s love & mercy are not hindered by them.
I was debating whether to say something about this.
I am extremely allergic to a great many things on God’s green earth, among them – wheat. I am so seriously allergic I can’t even eat food processed on the same equipment as wheat; I haven’t been able to eat anything wheat adjacent for over two decades.
About three years ago, I accidentally ate a bite of a taco that had been made with a flour tortilla rather than a corn tortilla. It knocked me on my rear for over three hours. Have you ever had your muscles turn to water such that you can’t even move, while your head swims and your heart begins arythmia? For multiple hours? Because I can’t recommend it.
I have recieved communion AT LEAST every week from both NO and TLM, and I have NEVER reacted to the host. Not once. Yet a single bite of tortilla about the size of a host has the power to nearly kill me.
Now, spiritual communion is fine and all, but unless you’re suggesting I’m somehow ‘special’ enough the Lord is specially performing transubstantiation between my lips and my stomach, you might, might, want to reexamine your assumptions.
What evidence would you accept that you were mistaken in your interpretation? Any evidence? At all?
To URIELANGELI:
I’m very glad you did decide to comment.
How such a thing works no one really knows, other than it being the grace of God, though I would suggest that yes, you are so special that He has effected such in response to your faith.
As I opined in response to another comment, I speculate that God suspends supernatural law, on occassion and according to His will, during this great age of apostasy. Most Sedes would castigate me for this opinion (indeed, they do) because ‘on paper’ the Montini ‘sacraments’ are absolutely invalid, and, by the very state of the actual Church, the teachings & conduct of the false NO church and the Vatican II Sect (and by extension the state of the world) it is simply impossible that the putative Church is the Catholic Church. And, to believe otherwise is, in effect, wittingly or otherwise, to assign to the spotless Bride of Christ that which is repugnant, unholy and wicked. These things we know are impossible.
The answer to the question is a habit I’ve routinely observed amongst “conservatives.”
It is not necessarily because they are “controlled” or “grifters” ie fakes.
They suffer from a disorientating ingrained habits of:
– Assuming the best about their enemies.
– The slogan “innocent until proven guilty”
– Demanding a high cartoonly obvious burden of proof in order to act
In other words, a reluctance to judge.
Followed by an unwillingness to condemn.
This they imagine to falsely call, “humility”, “patience”, “prudence”, etc.
All legalistic abuses of the virtues in practice, justified out of concerned caution to protect the sensitivities of all the imaginary numbers of weak followers out there who may apostasize at the merest rumor of a scandal.
So they are being quiet and obfuscating, all to protect us! That’s right, this is all their audience’s fault! As in, YOU! Please remember to thank them for their duty to THE Crown!
Thank you, Father, for writing this article!! It brings me such hope! Perhaps my comatose friends, victims of the Trad Inc Lullaby, will indeed arise. 🙏
One final comment and then I’m done here… Trad Inc media, run by profit by lay people, are bu$ine$$e$. Having a scandalous man on the Chair of St. Peter and scandalous men having perverted follies in the chanceries is good for their business because our human nature draws to the scandalous. I’m going to come out and say most of these Trad Inc media outlets on YouTube especially don’t really care about Robert Prevost’s soul any more than they did for Jorge Bergoglio’s. What they care about are clicks/metrics and their donate button.
Regarding the snake Bugnini achieving the destruction of the Sacraments for how many millions upon millions of souls…it is up to God Almighty whether or not He succeeded. As others have stated above, I have been transformed and directly encouraged by Our Lord to assist at the NO Mass and confession for over 20 years…even sacrificing attendance at the Latin Mass (which I discovered a few years after my reversion), for other purposes (clear leading from the Lord). I completely refute the above sede position that the Lord would totally mislead and abandon us.
Ps Another point of note is that satanists still frequently steal hosts consecrated by NO priests, and bona fide witches can tell exactly which host is consecrated from a bundle of hosts due to the utter hatred they feel towards the presence of Our Lord in the consecrated hosts.
Breaking: John-Henry Westen is out at LifeSiteNews.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lifesitenews-announcement/
They don’t tell us why other that the board voted him gone.
I guess seeing how LifeSiteNews covers future content and what they choose not to cover compared to Westen as editor will tell us all we need to know…
Re JR – I have also read the second half of the Third Secret of Fatima, which Fr. Luigi Villa published in his magazine. There is nothing about 2029 in it. It says “in the second half of the 20th century…”
It was originally published by Cardinal Ottaviani in the magazine Europa. The actual quotes from the Third Secret are given, intermingled with a lot of religious-sounding camoflage phrases. Fr. Villa, who had seen the original, pulled out the actual quotes in his magazine.
As regards what it actually says about timing, it is the same as Our Lady of Good Success. Since what was predicted did not happen in the second half of the twentieth century, I assume that the prayers of a great many people, including myself, asking God for more time, were answered.
It would be very helpful if JR would give the citations so we could all find it. Including the sources for Lucia’s “disguised handwriting.” I have never seen anything about that.
Is this online somewhere?
Ok, so where online is the actual Third Secret of Fatima? I’d be very interested in reading it.
More on the LifeSiteNews change of guard.
Look for Steve Jalsevac’s comments under one of their articles.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/pope-leo-xiv-warns-world-is-burning-from-global-warming-at-first-care-of-creation-mass/
Apparently LifeSiteNews staff’s poor morale and drop in readership was due to Westen’s editorial decisions to “excessively” cover “Catholic internal problems”, “Catholic prophecies”, “Catholic evangelization” at the expense of “traditional life and family-related issues” “for the world” (aka non-Catholics).
So protty and Novus Ordo readership was going down, while already converted Latin Mass Catholic readership was up, but too tiny an audience to be financially sustainable.
I absolutely believe him, but there you have it – expect LifeSiteNews to water down the Truth when it comes to Hagan Leo and if anything bears too much Catholicism. Also I’m betting that stories critical of Israel and Ukraine are also no longer kosher, and those likely fell under the umbrella of “Catholic prophecy.” Although I too was surprised that LifeSiteNews was covering war issues, but if seamless garments were good enough for the goose, then it was good for the gander, especially considering bishops have vocally hopped on board the Western propaganda paradigm.
So LifeSiteNews have provided insight on what it is going to take… the bottom line. Understandable as their situation is, it’s still sad. So let it be known ye remnant that the fight against the Ape of the Church will not be a profitable endeavour. We will have to fight at our own expense.