“I said the possible unexpected winner would be Prevost ten days earlier on Piers Morgan’s show. I did my research. No one in the betting circles or in the mainstream media was talking about him. But behind the scenes, there was talk of nothing else. They had two problems that he solves. First, they needed to find someone more organized but ideologically aligned with Francis to finish Bergoglio’s radical reimagining of the Church that has abandoned the Latin Mass and traditional pre-Vatican II Catholicism. Second, since MAGA -traditionalist Catholics have been able to cause such a stir in recent years, the flow of donations from the United States has fallen by almost 50%. The Vatican is not in danger of bankruptcy because it has resources, but it has a flow of donations problem, mainly because of the collapse of funding from the US Church and especially from big donors, like the Papal Foundation. Prevost is perfect. He is American but not too much ; he was born in America, but he is more Peruvian, he is close to Liberation Theology. Bergoglio created and selected him for this position. He has been a cardinal for only two years. He put him in charge of the powerful dicastery of bishops to make him known. An American was needed for donors to have access — so they can have their awards, dinners and papal blessings — and for donations to increase, but the American cardinals said in a press conference that he is the least American of them. His brother told the Daily Mail that they had discussed the name Leone before the conclave began. It is impossible for a virtually unknown American archbishop who has spent most of his life in Peru and has been a cardinal for less than two years to come to a conclave and win in the fourth ballot. It was Bergoglio’s globalist Curia. This election is completely rigged . Some Maga Catholics say he met with Cardinal Burke and said he loves the Latin Mass and everything will be fine, but that is not true at all.”
Video: https://www.gloria.tv/post/nUww9CgEejtp4sod3o7a8krj8
Since there is an actual canonical case to be made that Francis was an antipope, all his cardinals are not cardinals. And thus the conclave was not legal.
Until this is corrected, the anti-Church gets stronger.
I’ve been saying this for some time. The gates of hell cannot prevail against the Church because THIS IS ALL AN ILLUSION. Vatican 2 itself was not binding. But people believe it to be so. The Novus Ordo mass could only exist as an “option” to the TLM. But people believe it is the true mass. The homosexual/predator scandal in the Church can only grow and take root because no one has the guts to make the changes necessary. And until real f—ing men stand up and proclaim Francis and all of his actions as illicit, we will continue to live in this illusion.
Satan’s power is illusory. And I’m tired of weak cardinals acceding to it.
And I’ll say this again: if Prevost was doing time in Mexico instead of Peru he wouldn’t have been chosen. Peru is important because of Pachamama. The anti-Church might as well be called the Church of Pachamama, which means Satan. Prevost is a minion of Satan.
But it’s all an illusion, waiting to be destroyed by someone with the balls in the hierarchy to do it.
False pope.
There’s precedent that cardinals appointed by antipopes remain valid cardinals for voting in conclaves.
There’s no precedent for an apostate enemy of the Church scheming his way onto the throne and packing a conclave with red hats.
Bergoglio’s bishops are as legitimate as his magisterium.
Bannon’s argument misses that Card. Prevost had a connection with 2/3s of curial cardinals during his few years in the curia (which began several years before being given the red hat), surpassing other papabile, such as Tagle, Zuppi, and Erdo. But sure, “It is impossible for a virtually unknown American archbishop who has spent most of his life in Peru and has been a cardinal for less than two years to come to a conclave and win in the fourth ballot.”
FUD, FUD everywhere.
Catholics stay catching L’s
Mundabor blog: said that when head of that dicastery he voted to get rid of Strickland.
Maybe Leo can be reached through his brother.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/its-if-god-has-sense-humor
Humble beginning as most of us had:
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/pope-leos-childhood-home-was-on-the-market-for-under-250k-until-thursday/3742223/?amp=1
The assumption nearly everyone makes is Leo will continue Francis’s agenda because they believe that Francis was a real pope. Francis was a false pope, and thus not only lacking the grace of the Petrine Promise, but also made by Christ to expose how exceptionally lacking he was indeed as a wolf in shepherd’s clothing.
Leo is a valid pope, and his record as cardinal, bishop, priest is likely to change now that he has the grace of the Petrine Promise.
I’m still in a wait-and-see posture, but optimistic that he will be vastly different than Francis for the aforementioned reasons.
As you say, time will tell. Interesting, if you follow the Cdl. Siri hypothesis, Leo is only the second putatively valid Pope post V II (B XVI being the other, as Siri had passed by the time B XVI was elected). The Malachi (Malachy?) prophesies, not counting the invalid post VII popes, would place Leo as “the half-moon” or “under the half moon.” Quick google search says “half-moon” is symbolic of new beginnings, transition from dark toward light, etc. So, who knows, maybe things might be looking a bit up if he is valid.
I converted to Roman Catholicism from Anglicanism partly because there’s no way to square the circle of Matthew 16:19ff except for accepting papal supremacy and partly because the historical evidence for papal supremacy is intellectually overwhelming. For years prior to my conversion, I remained obstinate because the conciliar RC church was esthetically ugly in the extreme by comparison to high church Anglicanism. By God’s grace, my aesthetic revulsion was overcome in large part due to the synodal structure of Anglicanism which results in an ever changing doctrinal slide into hell. The apparent embrace of synodallism by L14 is a red flag that he is a heretic and no pope at all. I hope my current impression of him is wrong and he denounces synodallism.
It seems many do observe that something is amiss regarding Prevost; I think this is why: there has been no attempt to suffice for Justice…
https://canon748.org/on-the-office-of-divine-justice/