How do those who took multiple jabs feel about Fauci’s admission of guilt?

(Accepting a pardon means, by rule of law, you are a criminal. -nvp)


Admission of Fauci’s Guilt

January 23, 2025

“FAUCI, Milley & the Corrupt Congressman are attempting to have their cake and to eat it too. They want to accept the benefit of the phony ‘pardons’ protections WHILE at the same time continuing to proclaim their own innocence. This is a LEGAL impossibility. And if the Trump team doesn’t shut this down by bringing charges against all of them and forcing them to choose admission of guilt & the pardon protection, OR proclaimed innocence & defend in court, then the Trump team is just as complicit in this outrage. The Supreme Court has made it clear. You can’t ‘accept’ the benefits of a pardon AND simultaneously continue to proclaim you’re innocent. “A pardon, in our history, has been used as an act of grace, and its acceptance is an admission of guilt.” Burdick v. US (1915).”

— Legalman

https://www.thinkinghousewife.com/2025/01/admission-of-faucis-guilt/

One thought on “How do those who took multiple jabs feel about Fauci’s admission of guilt?”

  1. Accepting a pardon doesn’t mean by law you are a criminal. You’re a criminal if you’ve been charged and convicted.

    “Preemptive” pardons are a legal unicorn. They are what they are.

    Fauci is an evil dude. But it’s convenient to make him the scapegoat. Indeed, that’s why he was pardoned. He’ll always be the great scapegoat for the deep state now , which includes Donald Trump. And so we’ll think that’s it and done, and over, and it won’t be.

    After all, Fauci worked for Donald Trump, not the other way around. Fauci worked for Reagan. Fauci worked for every president the last 55 or so years. Why is he and not these presidents who were his bosses, the scapegoat?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.