Benedict and Bergoglio cannot both have been true concerning the Latin mass. If one says that no pope in principle can restrict it and the other pope says psych, then to accept the latter change is to undermine the legitimacy of the former. Then it’s just accepting whatever a pope says and just not paying attention to the reasons he gives, as though it is empty rhetoric or salad dressing.
Germany 1938?
The unmasked of 2020 and the unjabbed of 2021?
Things are coming to a head. This demon will get his.
Benedict and Bergoglio cannot both have been true concerning the Latin mass. If one says that no pope in principle can restrict it and the other pope says psych, then to accept the latter change is to undermine the legitimacy of the former. Then it’s just accepting whatever a pope says and just not paying attention to the reasons he gives, as though it is empty rhetoric or salad dressing.
Vatican One