From an anonymous priest-friend of Non Veni Pacem.

---

The Holy See press office released this statement of the 15th of March, 2022: “On Friday, March 25, during the Celebration of Penance at which he will preside at 5 p.m. in St. Peter’s Basilica, Pope Francis will consecrate Russia and Ukraine to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.”

Up until now, we have had numerous false-consecrations of Russia by valid Popes. These failed attempts have been followed by the spread of the errors of Russia across the globe. These have especially been seen in the past two years of the worldwide global scamdemic that sunk the rights of nearly all humans except the elite.

So what will happen when we have another false-consecration of Russia but this time by an antipope? As Pope Benedict XVI is clearly the only reigning Pope (for he never resigned in 2013) it should be obvious to every Catholic that Pope Benedict XVI must now consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. (Clearly, this needs to be done in union with all bishops of the world and with no mention of Ukraine.)

But many traditionalists (even some who currently doubt that Bergoglio is Pope) are saying irresponsible things like “Well, another consecration of Russia to Mary will just bring more grace, even if it’s not done perfectly and even if it’s done by someone on the throne who didn’t get there validly.” 

Nothing could be further from the truth. A false-consecration by a false-pope will not only bring down upon us the wrath of God, but it may accelerate the “errors of Russia” to a fever pitch, if not nuclear war. And when that happens, many Catholics may lose their faith in Our Lady of Fatima. Yes, billions of Catholics may end up blaming Our Lady for what they need to be blaming on Satan himself, namely, the placement of an anti-pope on the Chair of Peter who has up until now denied nearly every aspect of the Apostles Creed publicly.

Clearly, this false-consecration is planned on the feast of the Annunciation.  Why?  Because Satan always uses Bergoglio on Marian Feast days for his most severe attacks against Our Lady and the Church.  Consider the flashing of endangered animals upon the Vatican on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception in 2015 to the infernal attack on the Latin Mass on the Feast of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel in 2021.

Therefore, I call on the Cardinals of the world to depose this obvious imposter to the Throne of Peter who hijacked it in 2013 and now spews weekly material heresies. Unlike the debates surrounding the past attempts of papal consecrations of Russia, this situation is different: It is not the formulation of the Russian consecration itself that needs to be excised, but rather the imposter-consecrator himself.

Before the 25th of March 2022, the Cardinals of the world mustdepose this man who tries to make an ape of the Church, for that is the date targeted for that antipope’s mock-consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. The Cardinals of the world will be partly responsible not only for the physical fallout that comes after such a fake-consecration by a fake-pope, but may also answer to God for the spiritual fallout. As I wrote above, the spiritual fallout for such a mockery-consecration mayinclude Catholics blaming Our Lady of Fatima for the very works of Satan that follow in the wake of this event. I hesitate even to use the Holy Name of Mary in the previous sentence with her enemy, except only to say that in the end, one way or the other: Mary will crush her ancient serpent’s head. In fact, Mary has already crushed Satan’s head at the moment of her Immaculate Conception. But we must cooperate with God from here-on-out for the expediting of the Triumph of her Immaculate Heart.

Video should be cued up to start at 14:45. “Protect our skies… Is a no-fly zone too much to ask?” Be sure not to miss the pre-produced docudrama he shows near the end, with moving soundtrack. Sniff.

Folks, we are on the very brink of war with Russia. Say your Rosary and make the Sacraments.

Echoing Ann’s thoughts. There are various things in play here.

---

The Consecration of Russia must be done BY THE POPE. Antipope Bergoglio isn’t the Pope, never was and never will be. For Antipope Bergoglio to ape the Consecration of Russia would be worse than doing nothing. Pope Benedict MUST BE VISIBLY PRESENT.

If Antipope Bergoglio apes the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary and Pope Benedict IS NOT THERE VISIBLY PRESENT, not only will it be invalid, it will be a satanic aping of the Consecration, and one should expect nuclear war to be the eventual result.

JUST IN: On March 25, Pope Francis will consecrate Russia & Ukraine to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, during a 5pm penance service in St Peter’s Basilica. The same act, on the same day, will be carried out in Fatima by His Eminence Cardinal Krajewski, as envoy of the Holy Father. pic.twitter.com/umjZrNi7gJ

— Diane Montagna (@dianemontagna) March 15, 2022

ANTIPOPE JORGE MARIO BERGOGLIO IS NOT THE POPE.
HE NEVER WAS.
HE NEVER WILL BE.
ANTIPOPE BERGOGLIO CANNOT ACCOMPLISH THE CONSECRATION OF RUSSIA TO THE IMMACULATE HEART BECAUSE HE ISN’T THE POPE.

HOWEVER: I *SUSPECT* that Pope Benedict’s mere presence would probably be enough IF the Consecration were done properly with the correct intention, because remember, Bergoglio IS a bishop. But if the intention is mangled or perverted in any way, not even Pope Benedict’s presence would rehabilitate it.

Needless to say, I am HIGHLY WARY of luciferian skullduggery in this situation.

Stay confessed.

Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us.

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on us.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on March 15, ARSH 2022 by Ann Barnhardt.

They say laughter is the best medicine, even for the filthy unvaxxed. Be sure to keep reading until the end, there are multiple punchlines. While everyone needs a good laugh, just remember, “Many more variants are coming.”

By Alex Berenson

On Sunday, Kyrie Irving decided to watch a basketball game in Brooklyn.

And all heck broke loose.

In case you don’t know, Irving plays basketball for the Brooklyn Nets (my favorite team, from back when their home was a parking lot in New Jersey). He’s very good. He has maybe the best “handle” – ability to dribble – in the world.

Irving is also an odd duck. He made news in 2018 for saying he thought the earth might be flat.

Last year Irving decided he needed time off mid-season because he was upset about police shootings of African-Americans. By all accounts, his feelings were genuine. Still, most of us would get a one-way ride to the unemployment office if we didn’t show for work because of our feelings, however genuine. Having the world’s best handle has its privileges.

This season, Irving has been in the news for a different reason, his refusal to be jabbed with mRNA.

As a fellow pureblood, I am on Irving’s side. And unlike Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers, Irving owned his choice. He didn’t say he was “immunized” or “partially hydrogenated” or “league MVP so I can do what I want.”

No, Kyrie said he wasn’t vaccinated and wasn’t getting vaccinated. The end.

Only it wasn’t. The NBA and its players had agreed Covid shots would not be mandatory (professional athletes have unions nearly as strong as teachers), but New York City had other ideas.

In September, as part of his never-ending quest to ruin New York, then-Mayor Bill de Blasio required Covid jabs for adults going to indoor venues like restaurants or gyms. Including Barclays Center, where the Nets play. Then, in December, de Blasio extended the mandate to all private workplaces.

The mandates meant that Irving couldn’t play basketball at Barclays. He was allowed to play outside New York, but in October the Nets said they wouldn’t let him do that either if he couldn’t play at home.

Irving was due to make $35 million this season, just shy of $400,000 a game (which made him only the third-highest paid player on the Nets, amazing but true). Thus, every home game he missed cost him $400,000.

And I thought I was committed to staying unvaccinated. Though the team still had to pay Irving for the road games.

Kyrie’s stance brought him a lot of heat from the ESPNs of the world. Sports talk show hosts have been among the loudest screechers for Team Apocalypse. I thought they were men who liked sports, but apparently not. They were desperate to see the college football season canceled in 2020, and their disappointment when the games proceeded without dozens of Covid deaths was palpable. They have also resolutely refused to say a word about athletes who have heart problems after getting mRNA shots.

But Kyrie stayed firm. Dude said the world might be flat! He doesn’t care what some chubby middle-aged radio announcer thinks. So the season started without him.

The first crack in this standoff came in December, when the Nets said they would start playing Kyrie on the road.

Why? Because so many of their vaccinated players were infected with Omicron and missing games.

—

Yes, the Nets needed to suit up their unvaccinated player because their vaccinated ones had Covid.

Because vaccines work!

Then, in late February, Eric Adams, New York’s new mayor, made a partial concession to reality and rolled back the jab mandates for indoor spaces. (The mandates had worked so well that New York had far more Covid infections than ever before this winter.)

Now anyone, vaccinated or not, can watch a game at Barclays.

But the city’s workplace mandate remains in place, so Irving still can’t play. By the way, the workplace mandate does not and has not ever applied to visiting players. Trust The Science!

This combination of rules means that Kyrie Irving is the only person in the world who faces any sanction at Barclays Center for refusing to take an mRNA shot.

On Sunday, Irving decided to demonstrate the absurdity of the situation in the simplest possible way. He bought himself a courtside ticket for Brooklyn’s game against the New York Knicks, the city’s other and lesser professional basketball team.

Irving brings his unvaccinated cooties to Barclays:

Irving even wound up going into the locker room with his teammates – but as a spectator (safe!) and not a player (dangerous!).

If Irving intended to demonstrate the idiocy of the workplace mandate, he succeeded. At a press conference after the game, Kevin Durant, the top player on the Nets, called the rule “stupid” and added – in reference to Mayor Adams – “Eric, dude, you gotta figure this out.”

Durant’s honesty set off a new round of whining from the sports-talk screechers – how dare he call this absurd rule absurd! The emperor is fully dressed, everyone can see that! – and by Monday Durant had to issue a statement semi-apologizing for telling the truth.

As of now, the useless workplace mandate remains in place. And Irving remains welcome to buy a courtside seat anytime to root for the team he can’t play for.

Kyrie, if you need a plus-one, I’m available! We can talk clinical trial design and whether LeBron James is as big a douche as he seems.

UPDATE from the combox: Once you understand this, you understand everything. This is the pharmaceutical equivalent of Three-card Monte. You have zero chance of winning; the dealer controls every scenario. If you think you see a way to win, you’re the mark.

---

WPVI — To help fend off another wave of Covid-19, people will need a fourth dose of vaccine, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said Sunday.

“Many variants are coming, and Omicron was the first one that was able to evade — in a skillful way — the immune protection that we’re giving,” Bourla told CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

…

Protection after three doses is “not that good against infections” and “doesn’t last very long” when faced with a variant like Omicron.

“It is necessary, a fourth (dose) for right now,” Bourla told CBS.

…

Bourla said Pfizer is also hoping to make a vaccine that will protect against Omicron and all other variants of SARS-CoV-2 — the virus that causes Covid-19.

The goal is to create “something that can protect for at least a year,” Bourla told CBS on Sunday.

“And if we are able to achieve that, then I think it is very easy to follow and remember so that we can go back to really the way (we) used to live,” he said.

https://6abc.com/covid-19-vaccine-fourth-dose-pfizer-of/11650075/

Canon 332.2: “If it happens that the Roman Pontiff resigns his office, it is required for validity that the resignation is made freely and properly manifested but not that it is accepted by anyone.”

Pope Benedict never properly and manifestly resigned his office. He just didn’t. And whether or not it was accepted by anyone has no bearing on the validity of the act. Canon 332.2 is clear as day. So the summit of Cardinals who met in Rome nine years ago, culminating with the faux “election” of Antipope Bergoglio on 13 March, 2013, were participating in an invalid conclave, due to the See not being vacant. It doesn’t matter if they accepted the “resignation” not if they accepted Bergoglio as pope… the mind of a Cardinal is not the arbiter of reality. Invalid resignation leads to subsequent invalid conclave. That’s it.

Here are a few reposts to get you in the mood.

---

Timely reminder: “An act of deception, no matter how cleverly conceived or convincingly executed, cannot change the objective reality of a given situation”

Posted on NOVEMBER 23, 2018

So I watched this. It is clear, concise and quite, quite brilliant in its precision and argument. Benedict XVI has serious questions to answer and needs to be told that the Papacy cannot be partially abdicated as was his expressed intention. https://t.co/h0KckHn90E

— Laurence England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (@TheCrushedBones) November 22, 2018

One is reminded of the brilliant post from Louie Verrecchio at the akacatholic blog from 12 June 2017, which I have already linked to previously. This was about three weeks before I made my public declaration of moral certitude regarding the invalid resignation of Pope Benedict XVI and the subsequent Bergoglian Antipapacy:

Consider, if you will, the following hypothetical scenario:

A Catholic man and woman are validly joined in holy matrimony.  At some point, the man abandons his wife. No annulment is obtained. The man, still validly wed, proposes marriage to another woman; managing to deceive even their pastor into believing that he is single. Marriage vows are exchanged at the altar with the pastor as witness, and the “newlywed” couple is widely embraced by the entire community as man and wife.

QUESTION: Is the couple validly married?

ANSWER: No, the conditions for a valid marriage, in spite of the convincing outward appearance to the contrary, did not exist. We might sum up the general principle being applied in this case as follows:

An act of deception, no matter how cleverly conceived or convincingly executed, cannot change the objective reality of a given situation.

Indeed. Louie then moves on to a not so hypothetical scenario:

A certain cardinal is validly elected pope. At some point thereafter, enemies of the pope secretly pressure him via threats of harm, perhaps either to himself or to the Church, in order to force his resignation.  The pope acquiesces to this pressure and declares his intent to resign the Office of Peter.  The resignation is invalid, of course, given that “it is required for validity that the resignation is made freely.” (See 1983 Code of Canon Law, Canon 332 §2) Alternatively, the pope could have attempted only a partial resignation, which also would render his resignation invalid under Canon 188.

The pope, still the valid occupant of the Office of Peter, manages to convince the faithful – both laity and hierarchy – that the See of Rome is vacant.  A conclave assembles and promptly elects another cardinal who is then presented to the world as the new pope, and he is widely embraced by the entire community as the Holy Roman Pontiff.

QUESTION: Is cardinal #2 the pope?

ANSWER: No, the conditions for a valid conclave, in spite of the convincing outward appearance to the contrary, did not exist.  

I brought this up back in May in relation to comments from Abp. Ganswein as he explained why Pope Benedict still asks to be addressed as “His Holiness.” The archbishop’s response was, “He considers that this title corresponds with reality.”

Since there is suddenly now a great deal more interest in this topic, and since some people continue to insist there just isn’t any evidence, that it’s all conjecture and nothing else, I’ll just paste the whole thing here:

“He considers that this title corresponds to reality.”

Posted on MAY 15, 2018

That headline was the response given by Abp. Ganswein to the question of certain irregularities in the papal abdication. Pope Benedict had supposedly decided to resign, yet had chosen to retain his vesture, retain his title as pope, albeit with ’emeritus’ added (which is impossible), retain his residency within the Vatican enclosure, and his form of address as remaining “His Holiness”. HERE

The press questioned, “Why?”

The answer, “He considers that this title corresponds to reality.”

In Pope Benedict’s mind (“he considers”) that the title “Pope (Emeritus)” and the formal address “His Holiness” corresponds to reality.

But hey, I’m the crazy one for pointing out obvious stuff. Just go ahead and try to suggest on the interweebs that Pope Benedict thinks he retained some portion of the papacy. YOU’RE TWISTING HIS WORDS! YOU’RE NOT A MIND READER! After all, we clearly had a conclave, and “Francis” was clearly elected, and this result seems to have been clearly greeted by peaceful universal acceptance by the cardinals, right?

Do you know what is coming up this Saturday? Everyone is talking about it… The Royal Wedding! Harry and Meghan! It will be televised all around the world, and tens of millions of people will watch. It will look spectacular. All the rituals will play out, the ceremony will unfold, vows exchanged, and the prince and princess will be husband and wife.

Except they won’t be. You see, Meghan is still married to her first husband, because divorce doesn’t exist. Divorce is anti-reality. So all that will take place on Saturday is the appearance of a wedding, but in reality is simply fancy formalized adultery and fornication. Even though everything will be done correctly according to formula, nothing will actually happen. It doesn’t matter that all the attendees and everyone watching on television will believe that a wedding just took place. The metaphysical reality of the situation is that nothing happened, because a prior event (her actual wedding) nullifies the “result” of Saturday’s proceedings. In the words of Louie Verrechio, “an act of deception, no matter how cleverly conceived or convincingly executed, cannot change the objective reality of a given situation.“ HERE

Which is exactly why the 2013 conclave didn’t actually happen. It looked like it happened, everyone believed at the time it was real, but now we know that the weight of the evidence points towards a prior event nullifying its occurrence: Pope Benedict intending to hold on to at least part of the papacy. And if that is true, which I believe with moral certainty to be the case, then he didn’t resign any of the papacy, because Canon 188 says he didn’t. No resignation, no conclave.

“He considers that this title corresponds to reality.”

Out of error, truth.

“The “always” is also a “for ever” – there can no longer be a return to the private sphere. My decision to resign the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this.” – Pope Benedict

Archbishop Gänswein…said that Pope Francis and Benedict are not two popes “in competition” with one another, but represent one “expanded” Petrine Office with “an active member” and a “contemplative.” “Therefore, from 11 February 2013, the papal ministry is not the same as before,” he said. “…before and after his resignation” Benedict has viewed his task as “participation in such a ‘Petrine ministry’. (Not in its “Office”, the governance of the Church in the world, but in its “essentially spiritual nature”, through prayer and suffering.) “He left the Papal Throne and yet, with the step he took on 11 February 2013, he has not abandoned this ministry,” Gänswein explained, something “quite impossible after his irrevocable acceptance of the office in April 2005.”

And lastly, Professor de Mattei: “Benedict XVI had the ability to renounce the papacy, but consequently, would have had to give up the name of Benedict XVI, dressing in white, and the title of Pope emeritus: in a word, he would have had to definitively cease from being Pope, also leaving Vatican City. Why did he not do so? Because Benedict XVI seems to be convinced of still being Pope, although a Pope who has renounced the exercise of the Petrine ministry. This conviction is born of a profoundly-erroneous ecclesiology, founded on a sacramental and not juridical conception of the Papacy. If the Petrine munus is a sacrament and not a juridical office, then it has an indelible character, but in this case it would be impossible to renounce the office. The resignation presupposes the revocability of the office, and is then irreconcilable with the sacramental vision of the Papacy.”

It’s A Globalist Orgy, & Ukraine’s the Hotel Room

March 13, 2022 – by LH

“The United States has abused the world. The perverted criminals of Washington—for the past 40 years—have so recklessly treated every single entity they’ve signed a contact with, that the world simply will not trust the U.S. anymore after this latest Ukraine fiasco. The Petrodollar is now being dropped. No one understands this right now. No one but a tiny sliver of the population wants to come to terms with what’s about to happen. But Americans have been able to have their cake and eat it too. But now? Things are about to get worse than the Great Depression in about 12-36 months. You just don’t understand it yet.

“This is going to happen. And it will happen because of the lawless conduct of pedo-perverts running the empire. They’ve burned every. Single. Bridge. The Global American Empire (the GAE)’s reputation across the world is ruined. (UPDATE: Speaking of diminished reputation, our Iraq consulate just got bombed by twelve missiles from Iran.) From our fake vaccines to this provocation to nuclear world war. We have shown all nations that we are nothing more than criminals, and doing business with us is like building a house on sand.

“Make no mistake, Pedo Washington wants this war. They want everyone in the Ukraine—and Russia—to die. And they want everything over there blown to smithereens. And they want this because the oligarchs have committed such great evil in past decades, and they want the rubble to cover over everything so that they can hide their sins underneath it all. Russia , China, and a growing list of other powers realize this, and so they are making their moves now. Yet the liberal GAE remains obtuse, continuing ever-onward with its push for a new world order…”

…

“It astounds me how many people fell for the Covid narrative. It is conclusively and demonstrably clear that the Covid narrative was never about eradicating a disease. It was a vector for federal oligarchical control over every aspect of our lives. And when the gaslighting finally ended? They pushed Putin to the brink with blatant, contract-breaking NATO expansion, and an ongoing support to our puppet government, run by cocaine Zelensky—whose government is responsible for killing at least 13,000 Eastern Ukrainians in the Donbas since 2014. The good news is that the GAE is getting broken. But the bad news is that people are still being gaslit on a massive, global scale. It astonishes me how many people still fully and completely believe every jot and tittle of the corporate media narrative.

“Even well-known Traditionalist Catholics have been caught up in it. It’s absolutely insane. I cannot believe how many prominent commentators and blog owners in our tiny sliver of Catholicism continue to fall for whatever the Soros-owned media tells them. These people literally side with Soros, Klaus Schwab, and Bill Gates. I am witnessing people transform into Mark Shea in real time. It astounds me. People I used to respect are even eschewing Traditional Catholicism now…

“Some would argue that this is what happens when you can’t even open your mind to the possibility that we have an antipope. Some would argue that if you can’t entertain the notion that this is an apocalyptic time, then you won’t be fit for survival for what is to come. Jesus Christ said that those who persevere to the end will be saved. I suppose we will see who can persevere and who cannot.”

Read the rest for predictions on gas and food prices in the coming months, among other things: https://forge-and-anvil.com/2022/03/13/its-a-globalist-orgy-ukraines-the-hotel-room/

The commencement of your blessed and eternal confinement was also the day they created the wiki page for…

Remember “14 Days to Flatten the Curve?” Remember how this was how they got everyone to shut everything down, go into lockdown, and start the entire spiral? “We have to follow the science, we can’t risk overwhelming the hospitals, this is well-established epidemiology, dammit, you’re just selfish and want to kill grandma.”

Here is the blockchain history:

Happy Anniversary! 12 March 2020.

If you scroll through some more of the history, you will note the frantic editing of this page as we got into April, and they extended the lockdown. Sometimes a dozen edits in a single day. Go look for yourself.

Such a scam. Two years later, how many still don’t get it? Here is the page as it appears today; notice that Flatten the Curve is now old and rusty, not cutting edge science. Now referred to in the past tense:

4 years ago I was expelled from the European Parliament for confronting the US Assistant Secretary of health over Pentagon-funded biolabs in 25 countries accross the world. I was smeared by US media as "fake news". Who is the fake news now? https://t.co/jLzxVrZrP1

— Dilyana Gaytandzhieva (@dgaytandzhieva) March 10, 2022

Also…

Damn. I’m going to have to write all this up! After all the ridicule abt Russia’s claims of US/Ukraine using migratory birds for possible delivery of biological pathogens, turns out that WAS a major research program btw Smithsonian Inst & Dept of Defensehttps://t.co/FtNM8dIQSb

— Jeffrey Kaye (@jeff_kaye) March 12, 2022

You can’t make this up pic.twitter.com/kxf9YA92Jk

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) March 11, 2022

White House briefs ‘TikTok stars’ on Ukraine

30 “top TikTok stars” met on a Zoom call with the White House on Thursday to hear the messaging that the White House wants them to hear about what’s going on in Ukraine.

By Libby Emmons

It turns out that the White House is briefing TikTok stars about the war in Ukraine, the Washington Post’s new childhood expert Taylor Lorenz reports. “With millions getting their information about the war from the platform, the administration wants to get its message to top content creators.”

This was done entirely unironically, and a recording of the call finds White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki stoked to be there, and grateful to the TikTok stars for taking the time. Psaki thanked the TikTok influencers for coming to the briefing, and said that when she heard this was happening, she “basically crashed and invited” herself.https://rumble.com/embed/vui1ib/?pub=2n05b

30 “top TikTok stars” met on a Zoom call with the White House on Thursday to hear the messaging that the White House wants them to hear about what’s going on in Ukraine, to make sure the influencers had information from “an authoritative source,” said White House director of digital strategy Rob Flaherty.

“Thank you all for everything you’re doing,” Psaki told the influencers, “I mean, use of your platforms to educate, to inform, to debunk, to demystify, during what is a very tumultuous, heartbreaking time in the world is remarkable, and we recognize and value all of your platforms.”

Psaki led the briefing along with special advisor for communications Matt Miller, just as the Biden administration has begun a partnership with Gen Z For Change, which has a mission to “leverage the power of social media to educate our generation, encourage and mobilize civic participation, shift the political debate, and enact change.”

It was Gen Z For Change that gathered questions from TikTok influencers for the White House to answer, and the White House said that the briefing was essentially a “background briefing,” the type that would be normally given to reporters.

One influencer asked “What efforts or strategies are currently in place to either reduce or prevent the misinformation that we receive in the United States by outside sources, essentially, regarding the conflict between Ukraine and Russia?”

“So this is such an important question,” Psaki said, pandering to the TikTok kids. “One, we’re talking to all of you, and I think that this, part of that as we started off this conversation conveying is we recognize how important your platforms are and how important it is to provide as much accurate information as possible to people who are using their voices and their platforms to project accurate information. Because the best antidote to disinformation is the truth, right? And one of the big steps we’ve taken, and made the decision to take, is to declassify information over the course of the last several months. That is a hugely significant step.”

One of those in attendance was Khalil Greene, who has nearly 555,000 followers on the platform. “People in my generation get all our information from TikTok,” he told Lorenz. “It’s the first place we’re searching up new topics and learning about things.”

Psaki gave insight as to how the “government is making decisions.” She said, telling the influencers that the “national security team has been rallying the world.”

The White House told the influencers that the Russians “are bombing hospitals, and maternity wards,” and that “Russia can longer achieve their long term objectives here.”

The briefing seems to have had the intended impact, as many of the influencers on the call began posting videos about having been invited to the briefing.

https://thepostmillennial.com/white-house-briefs-tiktok-stars-on-ukraine

“Russian Roulette” pt. 2

Read part 1 here

Edmund J. Mazza, PhD March 11, 2022

…

On March 25th, 1984, Pope St. John Paul II held a ceremony to perform a consecration to Mary’s Immaculate Heart, but at the last moment, decided not to name Russia, after all…

To know what happened next, one must be old enough to have lived through this era, or one must finish reading this article.

In Part One, I asserted that the immediate cause of the war in Ukraine was Zelensky’s government’s decision to institute a policy to take back the Crimean Peninsula from Russia, one year ago, in February/March 2021. This is precisely when a new administration took power in Washington offering its blessing, as reported by The Jamestown Foundation, (a source which has been considered to be neo-con and subsequently hostile to Russia):

The United States government became the first to endorse the Crimea Platform initiative and proselytize for it, without awaiting the outcome of the… administration’s Ukraine policy review. Addressing the United Nations Security Council’s February 11 session, dedicated to Ukraine… the US mission’s political coordinator, Rodney Hunter, stated, ‘We welcome Ukraine’s Crimea Platform initiative and hope that like-minded partners will consider joining it’ (Ukrinform, February 11).

This Western misstep, along with the NATO advance east as previously stated in Part One, among others, has finally come home to roost—or shall we say, Rus?

Perhaps it will come as news to most that Russians and Ukrainians were once one people: the Kievan Rus. Historians have characterized them as “Slavic-Viking barbarians.” Indeed, their first appearance on the stage of history is when they sent a mighty fleet across the Black Sea to conquer the capital of Eastern Christendom, Constantinople. In June AD 860, they robbed, raped, and ravaged while the imperial armies were hundreds of miles away engaging the armies of Islam. How the city was saved is a tale involving a miraculous icon of Mary and a purported garment she once wore. Here’s the story from the chronicler of Rus…

Read the rest! https://onepeterfive.com/third-secret-fatima-kiev/