Month: January 2023

“He is to Be Accused by His Subjects.”—St. Isidore

“…there is an odd gnostic-myth floating around Catholic circles today that a heretic in the hierarchy can only be recognized by either a group of Cardinals or an obsolete battery of canonical trials. While it is true that the saints seem to delineate between “material heresy” (small points) and “manifest heresy” (obvious heresy) the latter is held by saints to be easily-identified by your average faithful lay-man or lay-woman living in sanctifying grace.  To believe secret wisdom on recognizing orthodoxy belongs to a shifty group of Cardinals is peak-gnosticism.  (Gnosticism is the old and tired heresy that only a certain group of “enlightened-elites” have access to “secret” divine-knowledge.)

“Rather, the Catholic Church has always taught you only need the true faith and blue-collar common-sense to identify a manifest heretic.  This means you do not need a group of Cardinals behind you with “an imperfect council” or canonists forming a “canonical trial” to recognize an obvious enemy of the Catholic faith.  (This is important because a manifest-heretic, by definition, ceases not only to be a member of the hierarchy, but even a member of the Catholic Church.)

“Although a “material-heretic” could historically be judged a “formal-heretic” only by a canonical trial, Fr. Paul Kramer asserts in his recent book that “any prelate can be judged for heresy by his inferiors” in regards to obvious (or manifest) heresy.  In other words, if it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck—it is a duck!  And, as such, “the duck” heretic must be avoided as a non-Catholic intruder (even if he purports himself to be part of the hierarchy) by your average member of the lay-faithful.  (The key-word here is faithful, as in catechized and orthodox.)”

Go read the rest HERE. Well worth your time. A man who is a public heretic cannot hold ecclesiastical office; he has in fact placed himself outside the Church, and you don’t need any sort of rank, degree, or office to be able to call it out. I’m reminded of an old Star Trek quote from the episode Conscience of the King:

Lenore: “Who are YOU to say what harm was done?”
Kirk: “Who do I have to be?”

The Stove Police

And then they came for your stove. Gas stoves, that is. Gas stoves are literally Hitler. Which, doesn’t this mean restaurants are Hitler, too? What about all those cooking shows? Is this the end of the Food Network?

Dr. Briggs has the story and the full debunk HERE.

I’m old enough to remember Cheap Trick singing about the Dream Police. This too may soon become reality.

But for now, buh bye, “Now you’re cooking with gas.”

Image

h/t el gato malo

Dozens of new emails show Biden WH crushing free speech on social media regarding the deathvaxx in 2021

New Discovery in Missouri v. Biden – Flaherty Directing Censorship for White House

By Tracy Beanz

Some recent discovery has been released in the Missouri v. Biden case, namely from Rob Flaherty, Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Digital Strategy. If you are unaware of what may be the most important civil liberties case in the modern era, you can follow our previous reporting here, here, and here.

Quick recap: This case is the MOST IMPORTANT civil liberties case we have seen in years and maybe the most important ever. The case is brought by Missouri and Louisiana, along with other individual plaintiffs. It asks the court to bar the government from colluding with social media companies to limit free speech.

They originally wanted to depose Flaherty, who was added to the suit in an amended complaint after expedited discovery revealed that he was ALSO involved in censorship activities. The judge granted that depo, but the 5th circuit (on mandamus) wanted the judge to reconsider because they hadn’t taken written interrogatory and discovery yet. These releases are a product of that discovery.

A few highlights? Sure. At the behest of the White House, Facebook was deamplifying and demoting vaccine injured patients from sharing their experiences even though the posts didn’t break terms of service. I detail this a lot more below. Additionally, Twitter refused to remove a post at the request of the office of Jill Biden, and really took a lashing. Also, did you know they were even censoring on WhatsApp?

This is really terrible and is exactly the kind of thing the government denies it did but clearly is doing. These are case winners here. Twitter responds to Flaherty, telling him they are taking action on a tweet by @RobertKennedyJR, and Flaherty asks to look at others like it.

This is pretty damning. Here Flaherty is scolding Facebook about content from accounts he disagrees with. They clearly want the vaccine “hesitant” to only get positive information on the shot. Think about this in context and from what we have known the entire time. Chilling.

There is just no reason for the White House and the POTUS to be involved in what social media platforms are doing to censor information that the White House doesn’t want Americans to see. It’s just completely unconstitutional, and the brazen manner in which this occurs is something.

These emails with YouTube are so informative I want to take them one at a time. How is YouTube handling the de-amplification of “hesitancy” themed video content for the Vietnamese community? You would think he was the CEO of YouTube reading these.

Tons more HERE.

Pfizer board member and former head of FDA Scott Gottlieb secretly asked Twitter to hide posts promoting Natural Immunity

To funnel his demands, Gottlieb used the same Twitter lobbyist the White House did – fresh evidence of overlap between the company selling mRNA shots and the government forcing them on the public.

By Alex Berenson

On August 27, 2021, Dr. Scott Gottlieb – a Pfizer director with over 550,000 Twitter followers – saw a tweet he didn’t like, a tweet that might hurt sales of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines.

The tweet explained correctly that natural immunity after Covid infection was superior to vaccine protection. It called on the White House to “follow the science” and exempt people with natural immunity from upcoming vaccine mandates.

It came not from an “anti-vaxxer” like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., but from Dr. Brett Giroir, a physician who had briefly followed Gottlieb as the head of the Food & Drug Administration. Further, the tweet actually encouraged people who did not have natural immunity to “Get vaccinated!”

No matter.

By suggesting some people might not need Covid vaccinations, the tweet could raise questions about the shots. Besides being former FDA commissioner, a CNBC contributor, and a prominent voice on Covid public policy, Gottlieb was a senior board member at Pfizer, which depended on mRNA jabs for almost half its $81 billion in sales in 2021. Pfizer paid Gottlieb $365,000 for his work that year.

Gottlieb stepped in, emailing Todd O’Boyle, a top lobbyist in Twitter’s Washington office who was also Twitter’s point of contact with the White House.

The post was “corrosive,” Gottlieb wrote. He worried it would “end up going viral and driving news coverage.”

I found the email in a search of records I ran at Twitter last week – part of Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files” effort to raise the veil on censorship decisions Twitter made before Musk bought the company in October.

I went into detail about my involvement at the Twitter Files in a Substack article yesterday. I plan more reporting on the files in the weeks to come.

Through Jira, an internal system Twitter used for managing complaints, O’Boyle forwarded Gottlieb’s email to the Twitter “Strategic Response” team. That group was responsible for handling concerns from the company’s most important employees and users.

“Please see this report from the former FDA commissioner,” O’Boyle wrote – failing to mention that Gottlieb was a Pfizer board member with a financial interest in pushing mRNA shots.

A Strategic Response analyst quickly found the tweet did not violate any of the company’s misinformation rules.

Yet Twitter wound up flagging Giroir’s tweet anyway, putting a misleading tag on it and preventing almost anyone from seeing it. It remains tagged even though several large studies have confirmed the truth of Giroir’s words.

(SOURCE)

—

A week later, on Sept. 3, 2021, Gottlieb tried to strike again, complaining to O’Boyle about a tweet from Justin Hart. Hart is a lockdown and Covid vaccine skeptic with more than 100,000 Twitter followers.

“Sticks and stones may break my bones but a viral pathogen with a child mortality rate of <>0% has cost our children nearly three years of schooling,” Hart had written.

Why Gottlieb objected to Hart’s words is not clear, but the Pfizer shot would soon be approved for children 5 to 11, representing another massive market for Pfizer, if parents could be convinced Covid was a real threat to their kids.

O’Boyle referred to “former FDA Commissioner Gottlieb” when he forwarded the report, again ignoring Gottlieb’s current work for Pfizer.

This time, though, Gottlieb’s complaint was so far afield that Twitter refused to act.

—

At the same time, Gottlieb was also pressing Twitter to act against me, as I disclosed on Substack on Oct. 13, 2022, drawing on documents that Twitter’s pre-Musk regime provided to me as part of my lawsuit against it. (Gottlieb’s action was part of a larger conspiracy that included the Biden White House and Andrew Slavitt, working publicly and privately to pressure Twitter until it had no choice but to ban me. I will have more to say about my own case and will be suing the White House, Slavitt, Gottlieb, and Pfizer shortly.)

Exercise is Racist

by Amy DeLaura

The No. 1 New Year’s resolution is to hit the gym and get fit. Now, Twitter is absolutely eviscerating Time magazine for claiming exercising is racist.

The article is centered on a new book, Fit Nation: The Gains and Pains of America’s Exercise Obsession. Time interviews the author, Natalia Mehlman Petrzela, who claims exercise is linked to “reinforcing white supremacy.” The article, titled “The White Supremacist Origins of Exercise, and 6 Other Surprising Facts about the History of U.S. Physical Fitness,” claims the trend of exercising is only geared toward white women. Petrzela says racists thought, “White women should start building up their strength because we need more white babies.”

Now, athletes, doctors, and fitness influencers on Twitter are dragging the magazine for attempting to connect exercise with racism, AIDS, and 9/11.

A reality TV doctor said these types of articles are ripping away America’s trust in the media, tweeting, “According to Time Magazine, when I exercise each day I’m engaging in a white supremacist activity. And the press wonders why America’s trust in media is the lowest it has been since that figure started being kept.”

One person even noted Time magazine is endorsing 15 minutes of white supremacy a week, with two headlines, within hours of each other, suggesting exercise to be linked to white supremacy and a longer life.

An athlete and former heavyweight boxer, Ed Latimore, tweeted out, “First math was a tool of white supremacy. Now it’s exercise. Pretty soon, food is gonna be a tool to continue systemic racism oppression.” Others were saying the article is attempting to steal content from the Babylon Bee, a satirical news site.

Video: The closing of Benedict’s coffin last night followed the solemn ritual for popes

Information obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request reveals the CDC identified hundreds of safety signals for the deathvaxx

CDC Finds Hundreds of Safety Signals for Pfizer, Moderna COVID Vaccines

01/03/23 By The Epoch Times Zachary Stieber

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has identified hundreds of safety signals for the two most widely administered COVID-19 vaccines, according to monitoring results obtained by The Epoch Times.

Bell’s palsy, blood clotting and death were among the signals flagged through analysis of adverse event reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The CDC, which runs VAERS with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), describes it as “the nation’s early warning system” for vaccine issues.

The CDC’s primary analysis compared the reports made for specific events suffered after receipt of a Moderna or Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine to the reports lodged following vaccination with any other vaccine, or all non-COVID-19 vaccines.

The type of analysis is known as proportional reporting ratio (PRR).

Safety signals mean a condition may be linked to a vaccine. Signals require further analysis to confirm a possible link.

The CDC analysis was conducted on adverse events reported from Dec. 14, 2020 to July 29, 2022.

The Epoch Times obtained the results through a Freedom of Information Act request after the CDC refused to make the results public.

VAERS is a passive reporting system that accepts reports from anybody, but most are lodged by healthcare professionals, who were told during the pandemic they were required to lodge reports if post-vaccination issues cropped up.

People who lodge false reports face penalties…

The CDC and FDA said in operating procedure documents that officials would monitor VAERS to identify “potential new safety concerns for COVID-19 vaccines,” with the CDC performing PRR analysis.

The CDC has issued multiple false statements on the data mining, but ultimately acknowledged it did not start performing the monitoring technique until 2022 — more than one year after the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were authorized.

PRR involves comparing the incidence of a specific adverse event after a specific vaccine to the incidence after all other vaccines.

A signal is triggered when three thresholds are met, according to the CDC: a PRR of at least two, a chi-squared statistic of at least four and three or more cases of the event following receipt of the vaccine being analyzed. Chi-squared tests are a form of statistical analysis used to examine data.

The results obtained by The Epoch Times show that there are hundreds of adverse events (AEs) that meet the definition, including serious conditions such as blood clotting in the lungs, intermenstrual bleeding, a lack of oxygen to the heart and even death. The high numbers, particularly the chi-squared figures, concerned experts.

For many of the events, “the chi-squared is so high that, from a Bayesian perspective, the probability that the true rate of the AE of the COVID-19 vaccines is not higher than that of the non-COVID-19 vaccines is essentially zero,” Norman Fenton, a professor of risk management at Queen Mary University in London, told The Epoch Times in an email after running the numbers through a Bayesian model that provides probabilities based on available information…

See all the numbers HERE.

Damar Hamlin needs prayers, most of all for his Particular Judgment

We should pray for his recovery so that he may, at minimum, express true contrition and be absolved from whatever he needs to be absolved from. Maybe our Lord is assisting him with that right now. Our Lord is the creator and master of every neuron and synapse, as much as he is for every galaxy. Pray for Damar’s soul first, his mortal recovery second.

I watched the whole thing in real time last night, including the first nine minutes of defib and CPR. The game should have been called the very second they finally exfilled him, but the league office, which must be full of psychopaths, waited over an hour. It was obvious to any normal person, and I was chatting to a few people as this was happening, any normal person knew it should have been called immediately.

No idea if this was vaxx related. But the other think that came to mind as this was unfolding, how the hell does the NFL and every other league not have a standing protocol on “collapsed suddenly?” We’ve seen hundreds of athletes collapse/die suddenly on the field since the deathvaxx rollout, and top brass hasn’t spent five minutes on writing out a step by step protocol?

Well, another former pro died yesterday, a mandate Nazi who wanted to put the unvaxxed in prison: