“As the federal government continues to grapple with the fallout from the deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol Building by pro-Trump rioters on Jan. 6, the Biden Administration has remained close-lipped about how it plans to confront the rising threat of domestic terrorism. This week, Americans got a first look into how that effort may unfold with the testimony of Merrick Garland, the nominee to be the next attorney general.
“In his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday and Tuesday, Garland declared that investigating the Capitol insurrection was his “first priority” and promised to “do everything in the power of the Justice Department” to stop domestic terrorism. He also warned that the events of Jan. 6 were not a “one-off,” and that the U.S. is facing “a more dangerous period” than any in recent memory.”
IN OTHER NEWS… it was also the first unarmed “insurrection” in the history of the world:
FBI Official Says No Guns Were Recovered During Capitol Riot Arrests
A top FBI counterterrorism official testified on Wednesday that no firearms were recovered during arrests of rioters who breached the U.S. Capitol on Jan.
“How many firearms were confiscated in the Capitol or on Capitol grounds during that day?” Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson asked Jill Sanborn, the FBI official, during a Senate Homeland Security hearing.
“To my knowledge, we have not recovered any on that day from any other arrests at the scene at this point,” replied Sanborn, who serves as FBI assistant director for counterterrorism.
“I don’t want to speak on behalf of Metro and Capitol police, but, to my knowledge, none,” she added.
The Italian blogger Andrea Cionci posted a cheeky essay coming off the Corriere “interview” with Pope Benedict and the new book by Estefania Acosta. His conclusion is that Benedict is the one and only pope, by means of a positive decision on the part of Benedict: Retention of the Vicarship on purpose, in order for all the evil to hatch out, and the Church be saved.
The whole thing is worth your time, link down below. Cionci ends his piece with 50 questions to ask those discerning the facts of the matter. Here is a tease:
8) Is it credible that Benedict continues to repeat “the pope is one ” without ever specifying which one, only for the “taste of spite” and that he does not foresee the destabilizing effects of his declarations?
9) If Benedict were not lucid, how could he have written books and given interviews until recently and, above all, preserved for eight years what appears to be a “perfect, logical ambiguity”?
10) For example, when Benedict, in addition to “the pope is only one”, declares to Corriere: ” Some of my slightly” fanatical “friends are still angry, they did not want to accept my CHOICE ” is perhaps equivalent to saying: ” My fans are wrong to say that I am the real pope and / or that I was wrong to resign ”? If so, why then does Benedict not explicitly blame his fans for their grave and sinful claims? Why, despite the title written by the Corriere, does the word “renunciation” or “resignation” never appear in Benedict’s quotation marks, but only “choice”? Here :
11) The first sentence could, therefore, also be interpreted as meaning: “some of my fans are angry for my CHOICE which seemed to them to resign, even if they did not understand that I have not resigned at all and I was preparing the Great Catholic Reset “?
12) Benedict continues: “ I think of the conspiracy theories that followed it: who said it was the fault of the Vatileaks scandal, some of a conspiracy by the gay lobby, some of the case of the conservative Lefebvrian theologian Richard Williamson. They do not want to believe in a CHOICE made consciously “. Why does he report these rarely mentioned actors, if the commentators have been talking insistently, for several years, above all about the “Mafia of St. Gallen” and international Freemasonry?
13) Could your sentence be interpreted, therefore, as an “affirmation through the negation of an off topic object”? (Example: Mom asks Luigino if he has stolen the jam. And he replies: “I have not stolen either the bread or the butter”).
14) Therefore, Benedict’s sentence could be read as “in fact I resigned precisely because of the pressure from the Mafia of St. of appreciation)?
15) According to you, Benedict’s phrase: “I made my choice eight years ago in full awareness and my conscience is clear” excludes a possible subtext such as “I am serene because I have never resigned and, waiting for the discovery of truth, have I consciously prepared the Reset of all enemies of the true Church ”?
16) Conversely, if there were not this subtext, how could Ratzinger candidly declare to Corriere: “I have a clear conscience”, given all the problems that, with his ambiguities, he would have caused the only true pontiff, Francis?
17) How many mathematical probabilities are there therefore that, in eight years, in each of his direct declarations, Benedict has always maintained a perfect and consistent ” double face ” reversibility of the meaning of his words, which can be interpreted on a more careful reading, even better if do you treat, as the “only pope am I”?
18) And if we wanted to consider Ratzinger weak, confused, or semi-modernist, has he ever made, on the contrary, a declaration that could completely deny the hypothesis about his “resignation” purposely invalid?
19) Would this presumed veiled and indirect communication also be compatible with the self-invalidating juridical language recognized in the Declaratio by some Latinists, journalists, theologians and now also by jurists?
20) Perhaps Benedict cannot, or does not want to speak freely for spiritual and / or strategic reasons?
A “tell” is when a con artist or cheat inadvertently exposes the con with a subtle slip.
The CDC issued new guidance yesterday for the millions of people who are now, supposedly, “fully vaccinated” against corona. I was eager to review the expert recommendations, which had been delayed several days as CDC and the White House went back on forth, agonizing over the wording. Included therein is a section that talks about which safety precautions these human lab rats need to continue to take on a daily basis. But before we get to that, I have a few basic immunology questions.
What does it mean to be “fully vaccinated” against a pathogen? It means you have been inoculated, your body has responded by building antibodies, and you are now immunized, right? Immunized, as in, immune. Right?
Immune means you can’t get it. Immune means you can’t spread what you don’t have.
No one can be a danger to one who is immune, and one who is immune cannot be a danger to anyone else.
Can a doctor or nurse please explain this in the combox? Why is the immunized population a threat to others? How can the immunized still get the disease? Is there such a thing as a lifelong carrier who can spread forever?
If I were cynical, I’d say the “science” behind this will be used to browbeat, cancel, harass, terminate, and possibly prosecute the resistance. What say you?
Antipope Bergoglio, Plain of Ur, Saturday, 6 March 2021:
“Abraham had to leave his land, home and family. Yet by giving up his own family, he became the father of a family of peoples. Something similar also happens to us: on our own journey, we are called to leave behind those ties and attachments that, by keeping us enclosed in our own groups, prevent us from welcoming God’s boundless love and from seeing others as our brothers and sisters. We need to move beyond ourselves, because we need one another. The pandemic has made us realize that “no one is saved alone” (Fratelli Tutti, 54). Still, the temptation to withdraw from others is never-ending, yet at the same time we know that “the notion of ‘every man for himself’ will rapidly degenerate into a free-for-all that would prove worse than any pandemic” (ibid., 36). Amid the tempests we are currently experiencing, such isolation will not save us. Nor will an arms race or the erection of walls that will only make us all the more distant and aggressive. Nor the idolatry of money, for it closes us in on ourselves and creates chasms of inequality that engulf humanity. Nor can we be saved by consumerism, which numbs the mind and deadens the heart.
“The way that heaven points out for our journey is another: the way of peace. It demands, especially amid the tempest, that we row together on the same side. It is shameful that, while all of us have suffered from the crisis of the pandemic, especially here, where conflicts have caused so much suffering, anyone should be concerned simply for his own affairs. There will be no peace without sharing and acceptance, without a justice that ensures equity and advancement for all, beginning with those most vulnerable. There will be no peace unless peoples extend a hand to other peoples. There will be no peace as long as we see others as them and not us. There will be no peace as long as our alliances are against others, for alliances of some against others only increase divisions. Peace does not demand winners or losers, but rather brothers and sisters…”
“Every one therefore that shall confess me before men, I will also confess him before my Father who is in heaven. But he that shall deny me before men, I will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven. Do not think that I came to send peace upon earth: I came not to send peace, but the sword. For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s enemies shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me; and he that loveth son or daughter more than me, is not worthy of me. And he that taketh not up his cross, and followeth me, is not worthy of me. He that findeth his life, shall lose it: and he that shall lose his life for me, shall find it.” Matt 10:32-39
Amen.
Antipope Bergoglio, Franso Hariri Stadium in Erbil, Sunday, 7 March 2021:
“(Jesus) liberates us from the narrow and divisive notions of family, faith and community that divide, oppose and exclude, so that we can build a Church and a society open to everyone and concerned for our brothers and sisters in greatest need… In the power of the Holy Spirit, he sends us forth, not as proselytizers, but as missionary disciples, men and women called to testify to the life-changing power of the Gospel. The risen Lord makes us instruments of God’s mercy and peace, patient and courageous artisans of a new social order.“
There is only one true religion, which can plainly be found by examining the evidence. The One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church will always be, until the end of time, the enemy of this world and its prince. Being a faithful disciple means making enemies; it’s right there in Matthew 10. There will be no peace, because evil always needs defeating.Furthermore, the business of the Church is the business of ETERNITY, not of earthly things. Her mandate is the Great Commission; her members called to work the vineyard, not become “artisans of a new social order” (Freemasonry).Jesus Christ established the Church to preach the Gospel for the sake of saving souls, to convert all mankind, handing over His divine office, and promising to protect Peter and his successors from error.
Following is a real pope explaining how it’s supposed to work, from Immortale Dei (pp7-9), Pope Leo XIII, 1 November 1885:
“Now, it cannot be difficult to find out which is the true religion, if only it be sought with an earnest and unbiased mind; for proofs are abundant and striking. We have, for example, the fulfilment of prophecies, miracles in great numbers, the rapid spread of the faith in the midst of enemies and in face of overwhelming obstacles, the witness of the martyrs, and the like. From all these it is evident that the only true religion is the one established by Jesus Christ Himself, and which He committed to His Church to protect and to propagate.
“For the only-begotten Son of God established on earth a society which is called the Church, and to it He handed over the exalted and divine office which He had received from His Father, to be continued through the ages to come. “As the Father hath sent Me, I also send you.”‘ “Behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.”(6) Consequently, as Jesus Christ came into the world that men “might have life and have it more abundantly,”(7) so also has the Church for its aim and end the eternal salvation of souls, and hence it is so constituted as to open wide its arms to all mankind, unhampered by any limit of either time or place. “Preach ye the Gospel to every creature.”(8)
“Over this mighty multitude God has Himself set rulers with power to govern, and He has willed that one should be the head of all, and the chief and unerring teacher of truth, to whom He has given “the keys of the kingdom of heaven.”(9) “Feed My lambs, feed My sheep.”(10) “I have prayed for thee that thy faith fail not.”(11)“
6. Matt. 28:20, 7. John 10:10, 8. Mark 16:15, 9. Matt. 16:19, 10. John 21:16-17, 11. Luke 22:32
Literal witches and demon worshipers are rejoicing at the altar of Bergoglio. Happy Saturday.
Representatives of Iraqi’s Shiite Muslim majority, its Sunni Muslim community, Christians, Yazidis and Mandaeans…joined Pope Francis (sic) at Ur.
Farmon Kakay, a member of a delegation from Iraq’s small Kaka’i community, a pre-Islamic religion and ethnic group related to the Yazidis, told Catholic News Service, “To see His Holiness is big news for me. We want the pope to take a message to the government to respect us.”
Faiza Foad, a Zoroastrian from Kirkuk, had a similar hope that Pope Francis’ visit would move the government and Iraqi society as a whole to a greater recognition of religious freedom for all.
Wearing a white dress trimmed in gold and decorated with sequins, Foad told CNS that even though her religion is not an “Abrahamic faith,” participating in the meeting was a sign that all people are members of the one human family.
In fact, Rafah Husein Baher, a Mandaean, told Pope Francis that “together we subsist through the war’s ruins on the same soil. Our blood was mixed; together we tasted the bitterness of the embargo; we have the same identity.”
…
Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi announced in a tweet: “In celebration of the historic meeting in Najaf between Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani and Pope Francis, and the historic interreligious meeting in the ancient city of Ur, we declare March 6 a National Day of Tolerance and Coexistence in Iraq.”
And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth. Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world. Matt 28:18-20
WASHINGTON, D.C., March 3, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Just over one year ago, a whopping ninety percent of Americans said they were satisfied with their personal lives, the highest ever reported by famed Gallup Reports.
It was an amazing feat. In just three years, Donald J. Trump had done what no other President had done: he led America to unheard of levels of personal satisfaction, pulling the country out of the Obama-Biden doldrums. And Trump did so despite a constant barrage of political and judicial attacks, the undermining of his presidency by leaders of U.S. intelligence agencies, and the incessant false reporting and mudslinging of mainstream media.
Gallup concluded:
It’s likely no coincidence that Americans’ heightened satisfaction with their personal life comes as confidence in the U.S. economy and their personal finances are also at long-term or record highs. That two in three Americans are very satisfied is reflective of this upbeat moment in time, and whether these sentiments carry through the coming decade will be something to watch.
This was untenable for global and national elites, who envisioned Trump winning a second term in office.
So what happened shortly after Gallup published their report on February 6, 2020? COVID lockdowns. Black Lives Matter. Antifa. Democrat Governors and big city mayors.
The U.S. economy – and human happiness – had to be destroyed in order to dislodge Trump, re-entrench the Deep State, and simultaneously launch the great dream of the Soros-led globalists, the “Great Reset.”
Action Alert: Top three questions to ask anyone who refuses to examine the nullity of Benedict’s resignation
Originally posted
Be they cardinals, bishops, priests, laity, friends, family, bloggers, Trad Inc., or whomever, I think now is the appropriate time to cut to the chase. Contained herein are three questions to be asked, privately or publicly as the case may warrant, of every single Catholic, no matter their rank, who professes Jorge Bergoglio to be the one true living pope. The timing seems right, because all the bad things hatching out of the Roman sewers are redpilling a lot more people these days. Something isn’t right, and the open worship of demons inside the Vatican has shifted the Overton Window in a way few other things could have done.
A man that is a heretic, after the first and second admonition, avoid: Knowing that he, that is such an one, is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned by his own judgment. Titus 3:10-11
It is of crucial importance to state at the outset that this has nothing to do with Bergoglio “losing his office” or trying to craft some mechanism in which to “depose” him. Folks, Bergoglio is a criminal usurper, which means he needs to be removed, not deposed. We have to get past the false base premise that Bergoglio is now, or ever was, a true pope. All of this heresy/apostasy has no effect on who holds the office of the papacy, because the office of the papacy has been held continuously by Pope Benedict since April 2005. Note well: It would have made no difference – at all – who was “elected” at the faux conclave of 2013, no matter if it had turned out to be someone totally orthodox, that person would still have been an antipope. There was no election, because there was no conclave, because there was no resignation. The personal apostasy and orchestrated demon worship of Jorge Bergoglio upon the high altar of St. Peter’s is not a causal factor as to why he is not pope.
However, the heresy/apostasy of Antipope Bergoglio does serve as a helpful proofset of the fact that he has never held the office, and so does not enjoy any of the supernatural protections of the papacy promised directly from our Lord Himself. If you think about it, this is actually a tremendous grace, because it would have been much harder to find the truth if everything appeared to be “normal.” It’s really not that confusing if you get your base premise correct.
“Now the Spirit manifestly saith, that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error, and doctrines of devils, Speaking lies in hypocrisy, and having their conscience seared….” 1 Tim 4:1-2
The questions which follow are of solid linear reasoning, which drill immediately to the core base premise. But they are also questions of grave matter to those professing submission to, and union with, an apostate heretic. It is out of fraternal charity that these questions must be asked, and answered.
Ready? Let’s get started!
Question One: How is it possible that Our Lord Jesus Christ, being perfect, infinite good, would permit the Church Militant to be put into a Catch-22 position of having to be in union with, and in submission to, a Pope who demands apostasy from the One True Faith in order to be in union with him, wherein we are literally damned if we do, and damned if we don’t? How is this not a clear violation of the Law of Non-contradiction, wherein the Standard of Unity is also the Vector of Schism?
If acceptance of heresy/apostasy/demon worship is the requirement in order to be in union with Bergoglio, which it clearly is, then how is that to be squared with the moral obligation of submission to, and union with, the Roman Pontiff under pain of mortal sin? Both things can’t be true.
“Look to yourselves, that you lose not the things which you have wrought: but that you may receive a full reward. Whosoever revolteth and continueth not in the doctrine of Christ hath not God. He that continueth in the doctrine, the same hath both the Father and the Son. If any man come to you and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him: God speed you. For he that saith unto him: God speed you, communicateth with his wicked works.” 2 John 1:8-11
Yes, we’ve had bad popes in the past. We have had dozens of men hold the papacy who were less than stellar when it came to personal morality, to put it mildly. But we have never had a pope personally conducting himself as an apostate heretic, with the dethronement of God and the deification of Man as his central Freemasonic theme (and now an open worshiper of demons, because that’s where Freemasonry leads), who is also intent on forcing heresy on the faithful by preaching objective mortal sin as a moral good, willed by God (AL#298, 300, 303 HERE; AL footnote 351 HERE; inter alia). That’s supposed to be not possible, and we don’t need some future council to explain this to us. God gave you a rational intellect and sensory perception, and He taught us to use these things together to discern reality (Matthew 16:13-20; Mark 8:27-30; Luke 9:18-20; John 6:66-71).
“For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables.” 2 Tim 4:3-4
Let’s take it one step further. When a true pope is elected, it is dogmatically certain that the transfer of the keys is conferred directly from Christ to Peter and to his successors, (Pius IX, Pastor Aeternus, 1870, HERE) not through the cardinals, not upon the Church, nor through the Church, but rather directly from Christ, immediately upon a validly elected successor’s acceptance of the office… (if at one time this seemed like a distinction without consequence, recent events have borne out its extreme importance)… which leads us to Question #2:
Question Two:How is it possible that Our Lord Jesus Christ, being perfect, infinite good, would force the Church Militant into a Catch-22 position by His own divine will, by conferring the office of the papacy upon a man known to Him to be a wretched apostate heretic, and then WITHHOLDING the negative supernatural protection of the Petrine Promises (Matt 16:19, Matt 18:18-19, and Luke 22:32), so that the wretched apostate heretic could openly approve fornication (cohabitation), adultery, sacrilegious Communion, and even perform idolatrous demon worship upon the high altar at St. Peter’s? HERE,HERE,HERE, and HERE.
Said another way: If you are a person who believes Bergogio is a true pope, validly elected at a valid conclave after a valid resignation, then it is an article of faith for you to also believe that the papal office was bestowed BY CHRIST HIMSELF on Bergoglio at the moment of his acceptance of the papacy. If that’s true, then how is it possible that “Francis” could be permitted BY CHRIST HIMSELF to wage war on the Catholic Church, raping His bride, yet somehow the Petrine Promises have not been broken? Both things can’t be true.
“But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there shall be among you lying teachers, who shall bring in sects of perdition, and deny the Lord who bought them: bringing upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their riotousnesses, through whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you. Whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their perdition slumbereth not.” 2 Peter 2:1-3
Souls are at stake, so I highly recommend everyone engages with those closest to them, pose these first two questions, demand that people actually think, and get them to answer. Put it on facebook and twitter. Permission to cut and paste from here with no attribution. Imagine if just a hundred people started doing this; it would exponentiate in mere days.
The answer to these first two questions, with a high degree of moral certainty, is that it is impossible for Jorge Bergoglio to be pope. Once the false base premise is out of the way, the next logical question to be asked is… what could have caused this? Which leads us directly to Question Three…
Question Three: Will you now, honestly and thoroughly, engage the publicly available data and argumentation that demonstrates that Jorge Bergoglio is an antipope, and has been since 13 March 2013, not by reason of heresy/apostasy, but as the result of an invalid conclave due to the invalid resignation of Pope Benedict? If you will not, why not?
Yes, the heresy/apostasy/demon worship is awful, but these things are clues, not causes. Bergoglio did not cease being pope because he worships demons. Bergoglio is not pope because the conclave was invalid because Benedict’s resignation was invalid. This is the root, nothing else.
Summary of events surrounding the invalid resignation:
Canon Law forcefully shows that Pope Benedict’s purported resignation in February of 2013 was invalid and that he remains the one and only living Pope. There are a multiplicity of violations which nullify the abdication, rendering also null the subsequent conclave and its result. Violations of Canons 17, 36, 38, 332.2, 188, 359 have been demonstrated, and Canon 131.1 is also in play HERE. For example, he used the term “ministerio” (ministry, lower case) in the essential clause of the renunciation, instead of Munus (Office). The Office and the ministry are not the same thing, and although he could have properly manifested his resignation in accord with Can. 332.2 without using the word Munus, that’s not what he did, explained HERE. Prominent Canonists and Theologians were already crowing about the faulty Latin and nullity of the act within hours of it taking place HERE.
Another subset of evidence includes Benedict’s “always and forever” discourse during his last General Audience 27 February 2013 HERE. This is where he revealed his belief that the papacy imparts an indelible character upon acceptance of the office.
Here, allow me to go back once again to 19 April 2005 (the day Ratzinger accepted the papacy). The real gravity of the decision was also due to the fact that from that moment on I was engaged always and forever by the Lord…
The “always” is also a “forever” – there can no longer be a return to the private sphere. My decision to resign the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this... I am not abandoning the cross, but remaining in a new way at the side of the crucified Lord. I no longer bear the power of office for the governance of the Church, but in the service of prayer I remain, so to speak, in the enclosure of Saint Peter.
Benedict admitted in that same speech that by instituting the role of “Pope Emeritus” he was creating a “novelty,” which means that he intended his “resignation” to be different tfrom any before, thus “remaining in a new way.” This concept was explained in great detail during Archbishop Ganswein’s epic “Expanded Petrine Ministry” discourse of 20 May 2016 HERE, wherein he explained how the papacy now consists of one “active member” and one “contemplative member,” and then (I’m not making this up) equated Benedict’s decision to bifurcate the papacy to God’s decision to spare His Blessed Mother from Original Sin via the Immaculate Conception HERE. The plain words of Benedict and Ganswein in these two speeches, if they were sincere and not subterfuge, demonstrate “Substantial Error” as a nullifying factor, as anticipated in Canon 188, since a bifurcated papacy is an ontological impossibility.
Speaking of subterfuge, there is also the possibility that the nullity of the resignation was intentional; four dimensional chess executed by Benedict in order to protect the papacy and keep it out of the hands of the heretics. There is no direct evidence which supports this angle, but it also cannot be disproven at this time. I mention it because it has a certain appeal, and although I think this scenario far less likely, it is possible.
Finally, there is furthering evidence visible to this day, which to the naked eye would appear we have “two popes.” This includes Benedict’s retention of title, form of address as “His Holiness,” his continual presence inside the Vatican, wearing white, wearing his not-destroyed Fisherman’s Ring, writing books and papers, blessing new cardinals, imparting “My Apostolic Blessing,” etc.
I’m just a totes retired not-pope, but allow me to impart My Apostolic Blessing.
The notion that Benedict really, truly, completely retired, retaining not a shred of the papacy, is absurd. And since a partial abdication is not possible, his Declaratio is therefore juridically null, reverting the situation to the status quo. This is true even if he has seemingly delegated the power of governance, as stated in Canon 131.1: “The ordinary power of governance is that which is joined to a certain office by the law itself; delegated, that which is granted to a person but not by means of an office.”
Benedict XVI is the one and only living pope, and has been since April 2005.
Battlespace awareness is critical to truly grasping what is happening here. Understanding the bigger picture of interconnected forces means going far beyond the tactical elements and individual breadcrumbs which have been provided for us.
Thank you to Ann Barnhardt for her contributions to this piece. The bigger picture is explained in great detail in Part Two of her Bergoglian Antipapacy video below. You don’t need to watch Part One first, as everything you need is contained in Part Two. For people risking their souls by being scandalized out of the Church because of the actions of a man who isn’t the pope… two hours of video is well worth your time.
Our Lady undoer of knots, pray for us.
——————————
The Bergoglian Antipapcy
PART 2 VIDEO: The Bergoglian Antipapacy: The Freemasonic/Teutonic Final Attack on the Petrine See Recorded 16 June, ARSH 2019
00:00 Introduction and Acknowledgments 03:13 The answer to this controversy lies in CANON LAW because it revolves around a JURIDICAL OFFICE and a JURIDICAL ACT, specifically the 1983 Code 05:46 Canon 188 Review 06:45 What exactly is the definition of SUBSTANTIAL ERROR? 09:26 The massive difference and distinction between OFFICE (an ontological state of being) and a MINISTRY (an optional activity derivative of holding an Office) 14:12 Canon 131.1 – Delegating ministries of an Office does not CONFER the Office. Only one who holds and retains an Office can delegate ministries of said Office. 19:29 This impossible maneuver of attempting to essentially dissolve the Petrine Office by delegating aspects of the Petrine Ministry to multiple men simultaneously has been openly desired and discussed by German theologians under the influence of Freemasonry for over 50 years. 22:30 The principal motive of the object the act was DEFECTIVE 23:02 The project of the Freemasons through the Teutonic theological school of the 20th century has been the dissolution of the Papacy along the MUNUS-MINISTERIUM distinction. 23:46 The Latin of Pope Benedict’s attempted resignation of only the “MINISTERIUM”. 24:39 Canon 332.2 – The Pope must resign the OFFICE, and it need not be accepted by ANYONE (including the College of Cardinals). The only arbiter and judge of a Papal resignation is Christ THROUGH CANON LAW. 28:22 The mistranslation of Pope Benedict’s attempted statement of resignation, “Non solum propter” was MIS-TRANSLATED from Latin into Italian, and then from the erroneous Italian into English, Spanish, French, etc. 30:29 Christ bound and binds Himself to Canon Law in Matthew 16:19 (The Keys and the binding and loosing) in order to prevent CHAOS. 31:17 Look to the Fifth Joyful Mystery of the Rosary: Finding Jesus In the Temple. Where did you think I would be? In this context, a JURIDICAL issue, look for and find Our Lord in THE LAW. 32:22 Canon 332.2 “…but not that it is accepted by anyone.” This clause completely protects the Papacy from the MOB, and especially from THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS. 33:11 Does it make any sense to you that the law (Canon, Divine, Natural) can be broken, but as long as the College of Cardinals, or even “almost everyone” goes along with it, then it is not just “okay”, but positively sanated and ratified by Our Lord Jesus Christ Himself? The new heresy of “Cardinalatry”, putting the College of Cardinals over and above the Pope and God Himself. 38:29. Pope Pius IX shooting down the notion that the Papacy is bestowed by the College of Cardinals, or even the Church. The Papacy is bestowed directly by Christ. 39:47 Can the Pope break the Natural Law? Can the Pope break the Laws of Arithmetic? Can the Pope break the Divine Law? DOES ERROR HAVE RIGHTS? Is God now giving clay to falsity? The Pope does now serve at the leisure of the College of Cardinals. NO!! 41:52 The “Universal Peaceful Acceptance” argument leads to an ISLAMIC chaos. It is an attack on REALITY ITSELF, and violates the Law of Non-contradiction. Ontological realities cannot be CHANGED in retrospect. 45:18 The Gloria Patri is a testament to the stability of REALITY in the timeline. 46:17 CANON 359 – The College of Cardinals has ZERO authority or capability to call a conclave is the See is not vacant, NO MATTER WHAT. No vacant See, no valid conclave. Period. 47:20 Reportage of Canonists strenuously objecting to the validity of Pope Benedict’s attempted partial resignation from literally within days of the February 11, ARSH 2013 announcement. 49:52 This “expanded Petrine Ministry” error did not just come out of left field. The J. Michael Miller dissertation: “The Divine Right of the Papacy in Recent Ecumenical Theology”. A collection and synthesis of the German theological academy’s plans for fundamentally transforming the Papacy – written in ENGLISH. The footnotes, bibliography and index are priceless. 55:10 The Miller dissertation agonizes of the following terms: “Ius Divinum vs Ius Humanum”, “Irreversible vs Reversible”, “Immutable vs Mutable/Changeable”, “Petrine Office vs Petrine Ministry/FUNCTION”. 57:27 Who are the key players? Kung-Kasper-Rahner-Ratzinger 1:00:39 Chapter 8 opens with Kasper’s quote, “The present crisis of the Papacy is one of legitimation.” 1:02:41 Kilian McDonnell on Walter Kasper’s plans to transform/de facto destroy the Papacy 1:06:10 The explicit distinction in the Miller Thesis between the Petrine Office and Ministry/Function. “The tow realities are, however, conceptually distinct.” 1:09:32 Ratzinger in his book “Salt of the Earth”: “Forms of exercise can change, they will certainly change… What concrete variations emerge I neither can nor want to imagine.” 1:11:40 BUZZWORD: DEMYTHOLOGIZE the Papacy. The Antichurch will need to have all the external appearances of a papacy, but will be devoid of all grace, in order to deceive even the Elect into entering the Antichurch. 1:13:33 The Ganswein Speech 1:18:40 Wherein Ganswein compared Pope Benedict’s partial abdication to the Immaculate Conception 1:20:09 Dissolving the Papacy along the Office-Ministry distinction has been the Freemasonic goal for centuries. 1:20:52 Leo XIII on the known agenda of Freemasonry to destroy the Papacy, and then the Church. 1:22:19 Vatican News quoting Bergoglio naming his agenda as “Humanism of Fraterinty” – the very name of Freemasonry. 1:23:22 The coerced non-abdication exile of Emperor Charles I Habsburg – Blessed Emperor Charles only “renounced participation in state affairs”. He did NOT abdicate. 1:25:42 What does Walter Kasper want? Money and power, specifically from the Lutheran German Church Tax revenues. Freemasonry and satan share Kasper’s goals. 1:26:41 So what probably happened? “Either you let us schism the Church, or we will schism the Church…” 1:30:33 Why does this matter? Why not just wait for Antipope Bergoglio to die? The Truth not only matters, but is the only thing that will set us free. Holding the false premise of Bergoglio ever having been the Pope leads to FALSE SEDEVACANTISM. 1:35:56 Canon 751 the standard of schism is the Roman Pontiff – so who is and is not the Pope CLEARLY matters. 1:36:59 What can be expected from going on offense and confronting the Bergoglian Antipapacy? THE GRACE AND FAVOR OF THE CROSS OF CHRIST. 1:37:55 The Visibility of the Church, the Church in Eclipse (eclipses are highly visible by definition!), and Humility 1:42:50 Conclusion
