Barnhardt Podcast #166: Wargaming the Antipapal Dirt Nap… combox is open!

You best start preparing yourself mentally, spiritually, physically, for the earthy passing of antipope Bergoglio, and what might happen next. You also should be prepping for the death of Pope Benedict, and what might happen next. We don’t wish death on either of them, and may they both die in the state of grace with true contrition. But time is getting short, and good folks need to know what’s what. If Bergoglio dies first, and a conclave is convoked, we will end up with two antipopes in a row, and it wouldn’t be the first time. If Pope Benedict dies first, and no one calls a conclave, the See will be vacant until some one does, which might not be until Bergoglio dies… but since the real pope had passed first, that conclave would be valid. It’s really not hard. Regarding the latest troubles for Trads, and the rumors of impending doom come Ash Wednesday (March 2nd), we discuss the moral obligation of disobedience toward illegitimate authority, as well as the moral obligation of disobedience toward unjust laws, even if they be from legitimate authority. Everyone needs to brush up on these things before SHTF. Enjoy!

Barnhardt Podcast #166: Wargaming the Antipapal Dirt Nap

[Direct link to the MP3 file]

In this episode, Ann and NonVeni Mark (because Ann and Supernerd are fighting… AGAIN) walk through the contingencies and scenarios of both the death of Antipope Bergoglio, and the death of the Holy Father Pope Benedict Ratzinger. Given either contingency, what should the Remnant Church Militant do? In keeping with the Feast of the Presentation, we make a deep dive into the concepts of Obedience and Recognition of Authority, specifically how rendering obedience and/or recognizing illegitimate authority essentially attacks both legitimate authority and the virtue of obedience at their roots. (Just for the record, Ann and Supernerd have never exchanged so much as a cross word, ever. But we’ll promptly let you know if that changes.)

Links, Reading, and Video:

Feedback: please send your questions, comments, suggestions, and happy news item to — or you can leave voicemail feedback at (302) 648-6373‬. (Alternate email addresses are and if you are looking for something more secure.)

Supernerd Media produces the Barnhardt Podcast, hosts Ann’s website, and more; if you got some value from these efforts and would like to return some value please visit to find out how to send a donation via a few other methods.

If you haven’t yet, consider adding your email address to the:
Barnhardt “In case of de-platforming” Mailing List

The Infant Jesus of Prague handles Ann’s financial stuff. Click image for details. [If you have a recurring donation set up and need to cancel for whatever reason – don’t hesitate to do so!]

New Johns Hopkins Study: Lockdowns are Useless and “Imposed Enormous Economic and Social Costs”

And so it came to pass that Johns Hopkins, one of the leading architects of coronadoom, two weeks to flatten the curve, social distancing, etc, has now released a new study saying “whoopsie,” okay?

Brett Monroe Garner / Getty Images

By Steve Watson

A new study out of the renowned Johns Hopkins University has concluded that global lockdowns have had a much more detrimental impact on society than they have produced any benefit, with researchers urging that they “are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”

The study was authored by Jonas Herby, special advisor at Center for Political Studies in Copenhagen, Denmark; Lars Jonung, professor emeritus in economics at Lund University, Sweden; and Steve H. Hanke, a Professor of Applied Economics and Founder & Co-Director of The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise.

The authors wrote that “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted.”

The focus of the study, according to the authors was to “determine whether there is empirical evidence to support the belief that ‘lockdowns’ reduce COVID-19 mortality.”

The researchers defined lockdowns as “any government mandate that directly restrict peoples’ possibilities, such as policies that limit internal movement, close schools and businesses, and ban international travel.”

The researchers further noted that “To answer our question, we focused on studies that examine the actual impact of lockdowns on COVID-19 mortality rates based on registered cross-sectional mortality data and a counterfactual difference in-difference approach.”

In other words, did lockdowns reduce COVID deaths?

The conclusion is no.

“Lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality. More specifically, stringency index studies find that lockdowns in Europe and the United States only reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average,” the study notes.

It adds “shelter-in-placeorders (SIPOs) were also ineffective, only reducing COVID-19 mortality by 2.9% on average,” further noting “Specific non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) studies also find no broad-based evidence of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality.”

In other words, lockdowns don’t do anything to save people from COVID…

Children up to 52 times more likely to die following a COVID shot: UK gov’t report

Data from Britain’s Office for National Statistics show a stark increase in deaths among children both single- and double-jabbed compared to their un-jabbed counterparts.

Featured ImageChild receiving a vaccination (Shutterstock)

David McLoone

LONDON (LifeSiteNews) – Britain’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) has released data indicating that children who received the COVID-19 jabs have suffered a death rate 54 times greater than that of their un-jabbed counterparts.

In December, the ONS published age-standardized data on the mortality rates of individuals in 5-year age sets in Britain, grouped by their “vaccination” status for the COVID-19 shots. The data accounts for the period from January 1 to October 31, 2021.

The ONS tabulated “Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by age-group and vaccination status for deaths involving COVID-19, per 100,000 person-years” but presented the data only for ages 18 and over. However, the jabs are available to children as young as 12, and those children are allowed to receive the shot against their parents’ wishes. In limited cases, children as young as 5 have been given a reduced dosage of the shots.

Nevertheless, as noted by The Exposé, a separate table outlining “deaths and person-years by vaccination status” includes 5-year age groups from 10-years-old and up. From the data provided, a calculation of the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years can be made.

The rate per 100,000 person-years delineation is used in preference over the simpler 100,000 population calculation to better represent the mortality rates over a specific period of time, as people in one “vaccination” group – such as un-jabbed, single-jabbed, and double-jabbed – soon move into the next group.

Table 9 of the ONS report shows the “deaths and person-years by vaccination status and five-year age group” for the entire ten-month period. According to the report, the un-jabbed 10–14-year-old group represents 2,094,711 person-years, and the 15–19 age set 1,587,072 person-years over the same time.

Table 9, ONS Report

From the above table the 100,000 person-years calculation can be made, with the younger group coming out at 20.9 un-jabbed per 100,000 person-years and the older group at 15.9. Following this, the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years is worked out by dividing the number of deaths within each group by the 100,000 person-years calculation.

The result is that for the 10–14 year group, the un-jabbed mortality per 100,000 person-years is 4.6 while the un-jabbed mortality rate per 100,000 person-years for the 15–19 group is 10.1.

Using the same data set and calculation, the mortality rate for 10­–14-year-olds who received one dose of the jabs suffered a 45.1 per 100,000 person-years death rate, while 15–19-year-olds with one jab suffered 18.3 deaths per 100,00 person-years.

Table 9, ONS Report
Table 9, ONS Report

Among those who received two doses of the COVID jabs in both young age groups, the death rates were higher still, with 32.9 deaths per 100,000 person-years among the 15–19 age group and a staggering 238.4 deaths per 100,000 person-years among 10–14-year-olds in the U.K….


Pachamama, Freemasonry, Bergoglio: On overcoming psychological blindness to see what is standing right in front of you

January 31, 2022 / Andrea Cionci’s blog (google translate from the Italian)

Denial is a well – known psychological defense mechanism – primitive and dangerous – which implies the refusal to accept reality, thus blocking awareness of external events.

If a situation is too difficult to handle, the person may refuse to perceive it, or deny it exists, to avoid dealing with painful feelings or areas of their life that they do not wish to admit.

Classic example, the husband who refuses to recognize the evident signs of his wife’s infidelity, because that “is his wife, she is holy, she is faithful and would never betray him”.

Something very similar is happening for the figure of the alleged “Pope Francis” whom the overwhelming majority of Catholics still persist, after eight years of crazy reversals, blasphemies and absurdities, to recognize not only as a legitimate pope, but also as a “Catholic “.

Now, a big emotional block prevents us from understanding the even elementary canonical question: as we have repeated and demonstrated ad nauseam, the Holy Father Benedict XVI has never abdicated, but forced by his enemies to get out of the way, without the cardinals ( faithful and infidels) were aware of this, he exiled himself in the seat impeded (canon 412), thus remaining the true “emeritus” pope, that is, the only one who “deserves” to be pope. Not having abdicated, the 2013 conclave was illegitimate: it was a meeting between cardinals, one of “their rituals “, as Benedict himself wrote in “Last Conversations” (2016), but it did not elect any real pope.

Therefore, since many find it difficult to understand that Bergoglio is not formally pontiff, even in the face of his most blatantly anti-Catholic pronouncements and gestures, they close to rational understanding and accept anything with the cry of: ” Yes, yes, that’s fine, but anyway he is the pope “. 

There is a comment to be made: not because you are anti-popes you are necessarily anti-Catholics. There were even two holy antipopes, Hippolytus and Felix II. But certainly, from the point of view of faith, due to the dogma of papal infallibility, an anti-Catholic pope cannot exist and, if so, can only be an anti-pope . Here we are?

Now – and we come to the bomb – a piece has finally been filled that allows us to understand the link between the Andean cult of Pachamama, Freemasonry and the magic of “Mary who unties knots”.

As you know, the enthronement in St. Peter’s of the pagan idol Pachamama , Mother Earth, was one of the most anti-Catholic acts of Bergoglio’s pseudo-pontificate. The Pachamama, to which animal and, once, probably, human sacrifices are offered, symbolically constitutes the perfect inversion of the figure of the Madonna , so much so that some priests claim that she is symbolically “pregnant with the Antichrist”. HERE . Freemasonry, on the other hand, as you will read HERE , constitutes the perfect “antimatter” compared to Catholicism and should intrigue what Luca Canapini and Costantino Manes write in “The ‘ferocious freedom’: South America between Freemasonry and Catholicism:”Think of the figure of the current Pope Francis , an Argentine and Jesuit, who has always been openly and ostentatiously progressive in the clear ANTITHESIS to the conservative and dogmatic reasons of Catholicism , and who proposes a reading of Christian ideals oriented to the PRINCIPLES OF RELATIVISM , to the OVERCOMING OF DOCTRINE OF SIN and the full acceptance of all religious and social differences. This is how the Church of Bergoglio aspires to become a privileged interlocutor of contemporaneity, MAKING ITS OWN A SIGNIFICANT PART OF THE MASONIC DOCTRINE “ .

Then there is the cult of the pseudo-Mary who unties the knots , to which we have dedicated a focus HERE . A pseudo-devotion inspired not by an evangelical episode, but by an obscure eighteenth-century ex voto, painted by the proto-Freemason Hyeronimus Langenmantel, kept in a German Jesuit church that Bergoglio – who certainly does not shine for “marianity” – has propagated in all over the world with obsessive and suspicious insistence. As we had identified, the adhesions between the magical rite of the Nine Knots and the Novena dedicated to Mary who unties the knotsthey are patent and disturbing. Warning: we do not express judgments of merit on Andean religions, on Freemasonry, on magic or esotericism, but we must highlight the unsolvable irreconcilability between these and Catholicism, which constitutes a scam to the detriment of one billion and 285 million people.

But what unites European Freemasonry, pre-Columbian religions and magic? The famous Neapolitan Freemason prince Raimondo Sangro di Sansevero (1710-1771) explains this in his work entitled ” Apologetic Letter”. Sansevero, a pupil of the Jesuits in the period in which, as the Grand Loggia of Italy writes ” the Society of Jesus elaborated daring syntheses between ancient wisdom and” revealed religion “ “, was also the first grand master of an Italian Masonic lodge. magician, esotericist, alchemist, occultist: a figure cloaked in genius and, of course, in sulphurous vapors who in his 1750 book dealt with the secret and mysterious language of the “QUIPU ‘”, the NODE-based notation system used by the INCAs in pre-Columbian Peru.

“Sansevero underlined the elitist character of knowledge in Inca society through a singular interpretation of that world very close to the reality of the South […] In fact, he spoke of the existence in Peru of the” feudatory patrician “, of the “cavalry”, but above all of the “Philosopher priests”, amauti (masters of knowledge ed), holders of the arcane secrets of the quipù seen in terms of a historical prefiguration and presented as a sort of INCAIC FREEMASONRY headed by Mancho Capac, the first of the Incas. At the center of their philosophy was the PACHACAMAC, the creator god of the universe in which the pantheistic image of the cosmos was epitomized “. Now, Pachacamac is none other than the husband of PACHAMAMA, the goddess of the earth.

The subtle humor, we could say “divine” from the point of view of faith, of the whole story is that the passage quoted is taken from the volume “The Prophets of the Enlightenment” by the historian Vincenzo Ferrone , opponent of Pope Benedict XVI , so much so that he dedicated the book “Ratzinger’s Strange Enlightenment”, published a few days before his alleged “resignation”. We owe to prof. Martino Mora the discovery of this real “gem”. Even more amusing is the fact that, the final censor of Sansevero was Pope BENEDICT XIV, a great pontiff, very cultured, enlightened, promoter of science who, however, in 1751, renewed the condemnation of Freemasonry with the bull  Providas romanorum pontificum.In short, Pope Lambertini (known for his frank language) seemed to say: one thing is sacred science, research and philosophy, and another thing is to go into the meadows following esoteric and demonic occultism.

Thus, the Pachamama family acts as a catalyst for a new, botched pseudo-ecological religion, pantheist, syncretist, Masonic, esoteric, feignedly good-natured, but destructive, which draws inspiration from a society like the Inca one, which was governed with a handful of iron from a single man, (a god-One, like the one mentioned by the Mason Grand Master Giuliano Di Bernardo WHO ), to whom a class of Freemason knights and priest-magicians were hierarchically subjected, or rather an elite of presumed enlightened ones. At this point, only a blind man does not grasp the overlap of this pseudo-religion with the most shamelessly declared objectives of leftist-Masonic globalist globalism,summarized with that expression that is so ” gomblotto ” and which was also used by Bergoglio himself in his interview with La Print of 13 March 2021: “We must not waste the crisis, but use it for a NEW WORLD ORDER”.

But be careful: the one prefigured in this ideological-esoteric soup is an authoritarian and fiercely hyper-controlled society, with a man annihilated in his vital force, without identity, tradition, culture, language, sexuality, economic autonomy, governed by a caste of very powerful people, custodians of absolute power and even of a mysterious pseudo-knowledge.

This process is already underway: hypercontrol is not even worth talking about, but only in this context can we grasp the follies about the family, immigration, the destruction of the productive middle class, gender propaganda, Europeanism. fraud, the flirtations with China, the disarmament of the population, the income-donation of citizenship, the abolition of cash, the massive digitization and the attack on private property made explicit by Archbishop Bergoglio himself, testimonial and sponsor – together with the Rockefellers – of the so-called ” inclusive capitalism”, which is likely to “include” your assets.

Shielded by his hypnotic, demagogic do-goodist-pauperist mystifications, the antipope Francis is therefore genetically modifying Catholicism exactly to lead it to be the container of this new world religion. Like a saboteur gnome in the box of Big Ben, the “bishop dressed in white” is unregulating some of the gears of the mechanism, so that in some time, the great logical clock of Catholicism will strike the opposite time. It does so imperceptibly for the great mass of Catholics, who, now doctrinally devastated by 60 years of sugary post-conciliar nonsense, could also accept without batting an eyelid a consecrated Eucharist with Coca Cola and pizza Margherita.

In aid of the victims of the psychological process of denial, we could recall how Bergoglio has already changed the Catechism (art.2267), bringing it into contradiction with the previous tradition, how he wears a symbol of the Rosicrucians around his neck, HERE how he inserted the RUGIADA , which is the NECTAR OF ROSECROCES (WHO ) and  how he overturned the meaning of the Our Father, changing the phrase “Lead us not into temptation”, philologically and theologically very correct (God tests), with the abusive ” abandon to temptation”, An expression that presupposes the fact that God, just like the Great Architect of the Masonic Universe – who takes no interest in his creatures – can abandon men to themselves.

However, a precise recomposition of Bergoglio’s religion still remains to be defined. We appeal to all scholars in the sector (write to so that they can help us (even in form) to find out which confidential traditions the pseudo-pope draws on and how this new creed of his di lui could be configured.

Always if it has an internal coherence. Articolo_blog/blog/andrea-cionci/30305055/il-principe-di-sansevero-sul-legame-tra-pachamama-nodi-e-massoneria-il-culto-di-bergoglio- alias-papa-francesco-.html

Candlemas, final thought: Be like Simeon!

GOSPEL Luke 2:22-32 At that time, when the days of Mary’s purification, according to the law of Moses, were accomplished, they carried him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord: As it is written in the law of the Lord: “Every male opening the womb shall be called holy to the Lord”: And to offer a sacrifice, according as it is written in the law of the Lord, “a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons”And behold there was a man in Jerusalem named Simeon: and this man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel. And the Holy Ghost was in him. And he had received an answer from the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death before he had seen the Christ of the Lord. And he came by the Spirit into the temple. And when his parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him according to the custom of the law, He also took him into his arms and blessed God and said, “Now thou dost dismiss thy servant, O Lord, according to thy word in peace: Because my eyes have seen thy salvation, Which thou hast prepared before the face of all peoples: A light to the revelation of the Gentiles and the glory of thy people Israel.”

Simeon had the Holy Ghost in him, leading him, speaking to him. Have you ever had this same sense? Seen someone else who has it? For most of us, we have our moments, but they are fleeting. You can’t get there without completely turning everything over to God. If you live out in the world, especially today’s world, barriers and road blocks abound. But if you want God to speak to you, know up front that it’s going to be a whisper, and if you are holding on to anything you refuse to hand over, lust, greed, stuff…those things work like white noise and you will never hear him.

Simeon handed everything over, and God told him he would see the Christ. He ordered everything toward this end, including his own death. For once the promise had been realized, he desired only death. “Now thou dost dismiss thy servant…”

Are you ready to say those words? Do you live every day with a Catholic Memento Mori bearing? Do you have the requisite fear of the Lord to guard against mortal sin? Do you make certain that your conscience is clear every day? When you do fall, do you get to Confession right away, as in, that same day? These things aren’t hard, and are only the very beginning of the journey.

We should all pray for a well-provided death. Fruit of the fourth glorious mystery. But if you are afraid of death itself, instead of being afraid of dying badly, you don’t understand Christianity, nor the Four Last Things. Folks, death will come for you. How you conduct yourself between this moment and that one is what matters. The spiritual life is about advancing your love of God, so that you might accept death with joy, winning the race, in great expectation of receiving the reward. You can never love Him as much as He loves you, but you can work on the relationship. He’s a Person. Three, actually.

Be like Simeon!

Vanity or Allegory of Human Life , 1646 1 (or around 1671 2 ) by Philippe de Champaigne 

Candlemas: Understand the reality of this day, and you will understand not only current events, but all the central truths of the Triune God, His universe, and you

Miss B. wholly nails it. Nothing to add. Happy Feast!

The Presentation of Jesus in the Temple: The Antidote to Narcissism, Elitism and Oligarchy

Today, February 2nd, is the Feast of the Presentation of Jesus in the Temple.  This is the Fourth Joyful Mystery of the Rosary, and the fruit of the mystery is OBEDIENCE and the LOVE OF THE LAW.

It’s a BIG DAY.

Witnessing what we all have over the past decade, the total collapse of The Rule of Law in the private sector, the government, and now The True Church in terrifying eclipse under the occupation of the Freemasons Antichurch and Bergoglian Antipapacy, the Feast of the Presentation is especially rich with meaning.

On the 40th day after His birth, Joseph and Mary, in perfect obedience to the Levitical Law, took Jesus to the Temple to be “redeemed”:

And every firstborn of men thou shalt redeem with a price. And when thy son shall ask thee tomorrow, saying: What is this? thou shalt answer him: With a strong hand did the Lord bring us forth out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. For when Pharao was hardened, and would not let us go, the Lord slew every firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of man to the firstborn of beasts: therefore I sacrifice to the Lord all that openeth the womb of the male sex, and all the firstborn of my sons I redeem.
Exodus 13: 13-15

Now, stop and think about the reflexive nature of this.  Jesus Christ IS HIMSELF GOD.  Jesus IS HIMSELF the God that brought Israel out of bondage in Egypt.  Jesus Christ IS HIMSELF GOD who commanded that all “that openeth the womb of the male sex” be sacrificed and redeemed. Jesus Christ IS HIMSELF the Author of The Law because HE HIMSELF IS THE LAW.

So, why did Mary and Joseph, and ultimately Christ Himself, an infant of 40 days of age, go to the Temple and perform this action?  Furthermore, why did Mary also at the same time undergo the ritual of Purification, the rite performed on women who had just given birth?

Shouldn’t Mary, Joseph, and ultimately Christ Himself have dispensed themselves from these ritual precepts given the fact that Jesus is God Incarnate, and Mary was preserved in immaculate purity, including her virginity, and thus had absolutely no need of any rite of Purification?

Why did they comply with these Levitical precepts when they were all so clearly above them?

Because love of The Law and obedience to it is love of God Himself and obedience to Him.

Can you imagine the Blessed Virgin, striding haughtily into the Temple, St. Joseph, nose in the air, looking down his nose at the priests, and declaring, “My Son will NOT be redeemed, because He is the Son of the Living God, The Messiah, and thus The Law does not apply to Him because He is its Author!” And then the Blessed Virgin saying, “And I, being free of the stain of Original Sin, myself having been Immaculately Conceived, and having virginally conceived Him by the Holy Ghost, carried Him and miraculously bore Him, am The Mother of God, and I am perfectly pure.“

All of the above statements are true, but yet we can hear how narcissistic, elitist, and devoid of TRUE HUMILITY and charity they would have been.  No, Jesus, Mary and Joseph all submitted to and obeyed The Law because to do so is to set a good example, namely by completely rejecting the spirit of elitism, narcissism and oligarchy that utterly permeates our culture. In submitting to The Law at not just the Presentation and Purification 40 days after Our Lord’s birth, but also eight days after His birth when He was circumcised, His Most Precious Blood being shed for the first time – a Proto-Passion, which, in and of itself COULD have been enough to redeem the whole world, because even ONE DROP of Our Lord’s Blood, contains in Itself an infinity of His Mercy – in these acts of GENUINE humility, Jesus, Mary and Joseph provided the most profound witness to the Rule of Law, and a total rejection of the spirit of narcissistic elitism.

What do we see today?  We see an Antipope, falsely installed after an invalid, illegal, non-canonical attempted partial abdication, literally telling people that to obey all of the Ten Commandments is harmful to the Christian life. We see the same Antipope attempting to convince every human being that THEIR CONSCIENCE, their FEELINGS are higher than God Himself, and thus trump The Law, and that man, not God, is the final arbiter of truth and judge of sin.  And, as is always the case in paradigms in which The Rule of Law is destroyed, we see the Rule of Man, that is, a paradigm in which the biggest thug wins, a paradigm in which blackmail, coercion, threats, and eventually physical violence are the only rule, the only “law”, a paradigm in which there is no right to petiton for the redress of grievances, a paradigm in which the jackboot of the biggest thug stomps the human face forever.

Think of every tin-pot dictator. Think of every bureaucrat hanger-on, slavishly defending their criminal overlords.  Think of every financial executive, stealing millions if not billions with zero consequence.  Think of every mafia and racketeering organization. Think of the faggots committing their acts of sacrilegious, desacratory sodomy inside the Vatican, and throughout the world.


All of it, ultimately, to prove to themselves that they are an elite caste, above the law, accountable only to themselves and their perverse passions.

Think of ourselves, and how many times we have convinced ourselves, in things both big and small, that “The Rules Don’t Apply To Me.”

The example set by Our Lord, Our Lady, and St. Joseph, which we celebrate today on The Feast of the Presentation, is the antidote to elitism, narcissism, and shines a spotlight on The Rule of Law and its criticality.

I hope you never pray the Fourth Joyful Mystery the same ever again.

Happy Feast of The Rule of Law!IMG_0023

The Presentation of Jesus at the Temple, detail, Fra Angelico, ARSH 1440-1441, Monastery of St. Mark, Cell 10, Florence.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on  by Ann Barnhardt.

New VAERS data now with almost two million vaxx injuries, and an explanation from HHS/CDC as to why this data only reflects 1% of reality.

Message from the Open VAERS Team:

What is underreporting and why it matters? VAERS is widely acknowledged, even by the CDC, to be vastly underreported. From their Dataguide:

“‘Underreporting’ is one of the main limitations of passive surveillance systems, including VAERS. The term, underreporting, refers to the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events. The degree of underreporting varies widely.”[1]

The Lazarus report from Harvard Pilgrim Health Care in 2009 used Epic (one of the largest electronic medical records systems used in the US) to gather data automatically from the system.[2]

“Every patient receiving a vaccine was automatically identified, and for the next 30 days, their health care diagnostic codes, laboratory tests, and medication prescriptions are evaluated for values suggestive of an adverse vaccine event. When a possible adverse event was detected, it was recorded, and the appropriate clinician was to be notified electronically.”

The researchers attempted to make filing a report easier as well. “Clinicians’ in-basket messaging was designed to provide a preview of a pre-populated report with information from the electronic health records about the patient, including vaccine type, lot number, and possible adverse effect, to inform their clinical judgment regarding whether they wish to send a report to VAERS. Clinicians would then have the option of adding free-text comments to pre-populated VAERS reports or to document their decision not to send a report.”

The results of the report state, “Preliminary data were collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) that were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified.”

Further it states, “Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”

The results clearly showed that injury was much more common than the one-in-a-million lie that is often cited.

More recently Steve Kirsch and Dr. Jessica Rose have both calculated an Under Reporting Factor (URF) for Covid vaccine injuries. Steve used multiple methods to confirm a URF of approximately 41.[3] Dr. Rose used of the current Department of Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) miscarriage rates to calculate a URF of 49.[4]

Thank you for sharing the truth with others.

The OpenVAERS Team


“US government knows COVID shots do ‘egregious’ health damage” … Military database filled with hideous injuries

Data leaked from whistleblowers reveals enormous spikes in dozens of diseases following COVID vaccine uptake in the U.S. military. ‘You don’t have to be a scientist to know … there is an issue [with the shots],’ said attorney Thomas Renz.

(LifeSiteNews) – Recent data from whistleblowers suggests U.S. government officials have been aware of alarming increases in dozens of diseases within military ranks, in correlation with the rollout of mandated COVID gene-based vaccines, and yet they continued to “lie” about the safety of the injections, according to Ohio-based attorney Thomas Renz

“This is egregious,” Renz told LifeSiteNews in a telephone interview. “They know this data. They have people whose job it is to monitor it. And despite that, they still lie about this [experimental vaccine] being ‘safe and effective,’ and they still try and push this out [onto the public].”

Renz, who remains involved in several major cases brought against federal agencies relating to fraud and violations of medical freedom rights, first revealed this whistleblower-provided data during a January 24 panel discussion at the U.S. Capitol hosted by Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin.

Three “decorated high-ranking soldiers who are doctors and public health officials” provided these figures from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) in sworn declarations under penalty of perjury, the attorney explained.

DMED is a health surveillance system that contains the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for every medical diagnosis among U.S. military personnel and their families. It is designed to allow authorities the ability to identify any epidemics, bioterrorism attacks, or other relevant disease trends as a means of maintaining a healthy military force.

First establishing five-year averages on dozens of ICD codes utilizing data between 2016 and 2020, the three physicians discovered enormously pronounced spikes in 2021 over the five-year average across many categories.

Renz said the numbers were roughly consistent year to year. For example, for the five years from 2016 to 2020, miscarriages numbered respectively: 1,431; 1,518; 1,493; 1,578; and 1,477, for a five-year average of 1,499.

“In 2021, we jump up to 4,182 [miscarriages],” Renz explained. “That’s a 279% percent increase.”

In addition, these spikes are only a partial representation of the 2021 figures as they merely represent data from the first 10 months of the year, January through October.

In providing further samples of 2021 increases from the dozens of ICD medical diagnoses codes, Renz shared the following:

  • Miscarriages — 279% increase
  • Female infertility – 471% increase
  • Male infertility — 344% increase
  • Congenital malformations (birth defects) – 156% increase
  • Hypertension (high blood pressure): 2,281% increase
  • Diseases of the nervous system: 1,048% increase
  • Bell’s palsy – 291% increase
  • Pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase
  • Cancer: 296% increase

With regard to cases of myocardial infarction, Renz explained that these numbers seem to have been manipulated and significantly altered as earlier records in their possession show a 2021 rate of increase that was approximately 20 or 28 times higher than normal, but now current numbers show merely a 269% increase over the five-year average…

There is much, much more: