(Note well, his base premise is false. The Bergoglian conclave of 2013 was invalid because the true Pope yet lived, and never validly resigned. But this is quite an essay, reprinted here for the record. -nvp)

---

An open letter from
Professor Dr. phil. habil. Josef Maria Seifert
Kartäuserstraße 16/6
3292 Gaming, N.Ö.
Austria

To His Eminence Cardinal Dean Gian Battista Re

Gaming, April 24, 2025

On the Need to Examine before the next Conclave the Formal Accusation of Heresy launched by Archbishop Viganò (and supported by many distinguished theologians, jurists and philosophers world-wide) against Pope Francis

Your Eminence, dear Cardinal Dean Giovanni Battista Re,

Most cordial Greetings in Christ. I address myself to you, dear and highly revered Cardinal Dean Re, because You alone now hold the authority to let an investigation of the accusation of heresy brought up against Pope Francis, take place before the upcoming Conclave.

You hold until the election of the next Pope the highest authority in the Catholic Church, will invite, in union with the Camerlengo Kevin Joseph Cardinal Farrell, the qualified Cardinals of the whole world under the age of 80 to elect the new Pope and can determine the date of the next Conclave.

I make my letter to you an open letter because of the short time that remains to settle issues of extreme importance and urgency.

I discovered through the text J’accuse of archbishop Viganò two – through the solemn invocation of the See of Peter and their declaration of being valid for all times – probably dogmatic and certainly most authoritative pontifical documents on the issue of “heretical Bishops, Cardinals and Popes” by Pope Paul IV and St. Pius V.

These texts seem to me to be of the highest importance for the Church at the present moment.

They solemnly demand that the Church proceed with an examination of accusations of Papal heresy.

Simply to have excommunicated an archbishop because he exactly acted as a prominent and a Holy Pope demanded solemnly to act when faced with a Pope who adhered to Heresies prior to, during and after his election to the Papacy, is, I think, gravely wrong and unjust. These charges should first have been examined, and if true, absolutely no punishment is proper for bringing them forth.

I think the Church owes it to an excommunicated archbishop and to at least four other persons excommunicated for the same reason, two Popes and to the faithful to address the firm insistence of Pope Paul IV that a Pope who professes heresy is no longer Pope and cannot demand any obedience, just as archbishop Viganò said, with the important aviso that the impropriety of any authority judging a Pope does not apply to a heretical Pope who just usurps the See of Peter but, in virtue of his heresy, is not truly Pope and has less authority in the Church than any orthodox Cardinal or bishop.

The crucial significance of ordering and completing this investigation prior to convening the next Conclave, resides in this:

The outcome of the next Papal election depends largely on the outcome of this investigation, because St. Pius V and Pope Paul IV decree that all nominations of Cardinals made by a heretical Pope are null. Thus, if the accusation of heresy prior to Pope Francis’s election, during and after it, prove to be correct, two thirds of the present college of Cardinals would be excluded from entering the Conclave. Therefore, the conclusion of this question needs to be reached before the next Conclave because otherwise the next Papal election is a priori invalid if it is not determined before whether the largest part of the members of the College of Cardinals are legitimate electors or not, and whether the future elected Pope belongs to the College of Cardinals or not.
Also two further strictly connected questions ought to be clarified before the upcoming Conclave:

1. whether the changes Pope Francis made of the rules governing Papal elections decreed by St. Pope John Paul II are valid or (if he was not a valid Pope) not, and

2. whether any of the Papal documents of Pope Francis are to remain in the Acta

Apostolica or removed from them (as Popes ST Pius V and Paul IV decreed for documents issued by a heretical Pope).

Popes St Pius V and Paul IV decreed and fixed for perpetual times: that all decisions, nominations and elevations of bishops and Cardinals and that all writings of a heretical Pope should be declared null.

According to these Papal documents and according to natural law, the Cardinals whom Pope Francis has chosen, cannot remain electors if the accusation of heresy or apostasy proves to be true.

I address myself to you, dear and highly revered Cardinal Re, because you alone, in union with the Camerlengo Kevin Joseph Cardinal Farrell, now hold the authority to let this investigation take place before the upcoming Conclave.

Since you, dear Cardinal, now, until the election of a new Pope, dispose over the supreme authority in the Church, you could take action immediately, determine the members of the jury among the Cardinals nominated by Popes prior to Pope Francis who would make a judgment on the question of heresy and validity of Pope Francis.
For this reason, I humbly urge you, dear Cardinal Dean, to exercise your authority in such a dramatic moment in the history of the Church, and to act on the authority of two Popes who demand such an action.

I think presently only you could be, comparable with St Athanasius, who, still Deacon, when confronted with the Arian crisis and a wavering Pope, was able, (in spite of his 2 excommunications during the process), to prepare the way for some Councils that condemned the Arian heresy, that, if accepted, would have been deadly for Christian faith. But the heresy that God wants the plurality of religions including non-Christian ones, and others attributed to Pope Francis are even more antithetical to true Christian faith than Arianism was.

Therefore, I suggest and humbly implore you that you ordain before the impending Conclave a just and fair examination of the many accusations of heresy and (in view of the Abu Dhabi declaration that God wanted the plurality of religions from Creation on, and of the Pacha Mama worship in the Vatican) also of possible apostasy of Pope Francis.
I think that by this action you could save the Church from a historically speaking unique confusion of catastrophic proportions.

You would stand on the firm ground of the documents of Paul IV and St. Pius V, both of whom taught solemnly that even if ALL CARDINALS HAD ELECTED THE POPE FREELY, HIS ELECTION WOULD BE NULLIFIED by heresies he defended before and after his election.
This has nothing to do with you acting against the Church or against the Pope: on the contrary, it is an act of supreme love for the Church and Francis: for IF the accusation of heresy, having been launched formally and informally by high doctrinal and theological authorities against Francis, will be found true in a due ecclesiastic process, the Church will confront the faithful with the truth (and already Socrates said in the Gorgias) that no more precious gift could be bestowed on a person than freeing him from an error. The chance to free Francis during his life-time of errors, has now, given his death, been missed. But if Pope Francis did hopefully revoke any error before his death and certainly recognizes them now, to condemn them and to free the Church’s doctrine from them, would still be an act of love for Pope Francis and above all for Jesus’s bride, the Church, freeing it from the tremendous evil of heresies.

I think that, if the accusation of heresy is true, a valid official verdict that Francis is a heretic and therefore was not a valid Pope, as has been done with regard to several Popes before, also posthumously, would be of greatest benefit for the future of the Church. For even if Pope Francis would have resigned his office, just as Pope Benedict XVI did, this would not at all have been enough to heal the terrible wound of a heretical Pope, because the destructive elements and poisonous fruits of his Pontificate would remain:

1. The Acta Apostolica would continue to contain uncondemned heresies.

2. Heretical moral teachings such as those expressed in AL would seemingly remain official Church teaching and seduce the faithful to commit grave sins.

3. Many other heretical remarks of the Pope that contradict directly the solemn words of Christ and Church dogmas would not be stricken from the corpus of Church teaching, such as:

a. Francis’s (private but repeated) “teaching” of an empty hell and the non-existence of eternal punishment,

b. the affirmation of an annihilation instead of eternal punishment of incurably grave sinners, a typical teaching of Jehovah’s Witnesses incompatible with several dogmas.

c. The sentence in the Abu Dhabi declaration of God willing from creation on the plurality of religions (including those that deny the divinity of Christ, the Holy Trinity, redemption through Christ alone, etc.) that is more apostatic than just heretical, would not be removed from the Acta Apostolica but remain prescribed to all Bishops and Rectors of seminaries in the world to teach in seminaries in the una, sancta, catholica et apostolica Ecclesia as part of the preparation of Seminarians for the holy orders. This apostatic sentence would remain in the eyes of the faithful “Church teaching” but is in reality not only un- or even anti-Catholic but also anti—Christian and this would do immense harm to faith and morals if left in the Acta Apostolica.

3. Besides, only if Francis, after the Church examining and condemning his heresies that are far, far worse than those of any previous Pope such as John XXII, were declared posthumously not to have been the true Pope, many actions the Pope took (Papal praise and celebration of reformation day, statue, stamp and praise of Luther; Pacha Mamma cult in St Peter; blessings of homosexual and adulterous couples, the false claim that through their conscience adulterous and remarried couples can know that God wants them to remain in the sin of adultery, rather than following the perpetual teaching of the Church on marriage expressed in Familiaris Consortio 83 etc., etc.), could no longer be considered legitimate Catholic actions and teachings, nor would his documents remain accepted as part of true Catholic teaching.

In consequence, according to Paul IV’s and St. Pope Pius Vth, in my estimation, infallible Papal teaching, likewise Francis’ having nominated 80 % of Cardinal-electors (who will, humanly speaking, be likely to elect a Pope that might continue teaching the heresies of Francis) will be retracted and cease to remain a horrible threat to the upcoming Conclave and election of a new Pope.

For all these reasons, dear Cardinal Gianbattista Re, I implore you in the name of Jesus Christ, of his and our beloved mother who kills all heresies, and in the name of St. Joseph, the terror daemonum, to consider whether you might not be called to help freeing the Church from the mentioned evils.

I ask you on my knees to examine whether God does not call you, in his name and that of Jesus Christ, to become a human instrument of saving the Church from the abyss toward which it seems to be rushing.

This step seems to me the only right one, and the negative results it could provoke, the actual occurring of a division in the Church between the Bergoglio-Church and the true Church would be a much lesser evil than a tranquil church of disorder plunged into error; in fact, it would be a true blessing because it would lead to a revival of the true UNA, SANCTA, CATOLICA ET APOSTOLICA ECCLESIA founded UPON THE TRUTH. I am also sure that countless Catholics would welcome this step.

I pray that you, dear Cardinal, in this exceedingly important point in Church History, will receive the fullest grace of the Holy Spirit and have the full fortitude that will make you capable to undertake whatever dangerous mission HE wants from you, whether this be what I think it is or something entirely else that you will learn from the Holy Spirit directly in prayer and meditation.

Therefore, dear Cardinal Gian Batista Re, may you imitate, in a weaker, human way the glorious St. Michael and perform a human shadow of his fight against the devil in heaven, smaller but in some respects of no lesser value than his angelic action.
Lastly: without a Saintly dignitary of the Church preserving the doctrine of the Church from being sullied by Papal heresy, I am afraid only a direct intervention of Jesus or his blessed mother, can save the ship of the Holy Church from sinking into a hellish abyss of error, confusion and destruction, which God swore never to allow.

But I think, as St. Ignatius said, God wants us to believe that everything depends on God, but to act as if everything depended on us. Aided by His grace, let us take up the armor of the Holy Spirit and fight the powers of darkness, with St Michael and his heavenly host of holy angels, Maria, Queen of all Saints, under the protection of St. Joseph, terror daemonum.

In the love of Jesus who gave His Life for the Church and shed his holy blood for all of us, and whom I want to serve with all my heart and as humble servant to your far more perfect service to Him and the Holy Church,
In Christo Mariaque
Yours in Christ

Josef Seifert

Strangely enough, none of the multiple calls of different groups of theologians and philosophers for Francis’ resignation, except for J’accuse, cites these two most authoritative pontifical documents on the issue of “heretical Bishops, Cardinals and Popes”.

Though I thought “a priori” that such documents must exist and was searching for them for a few years, I owe my knowledge of these two probably dogmatic and at any rate crucially important Church documents solely to archbishop Viganò.

There is a complete (and in the present situation tragic) lack in CANON LAW, as far as I can see, of applying the teaching of these two Popes concretely. But now, after his death, there is no problem at all but a clear duty of the Church to investigate whether these accusations of heresy and (in the claim hat God wanted from creation on the multiplicity of religions including those which deny the most central truths of Christ’s Revelation) apostasy are justified or not.

Originally posted April 24, 2022

Trad Hate for the Divine Mercy devotion is so cringe to me. Yes, I know all about the problematic parts of St. Faustina’s diary, and there are many problems. Saints make mistakes, even to the point of sin. It happens. Sister Lucia made mistakes too. Also, it’s not the fault of St. Faustina if the Divine Mercy has overtaken devotion to the Sacred Heart, and/or diminution of the Rosary… none of that should have happened. If you are a regular reader of this space, you know of my ardent devotion to the Sacred Heart, AND His Eucharistic Heart, AND Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, AND the Most Holy Rosary. You can have ALL of these things, if you direct your will towards them, and act.

But the subject we are dealing with today is a fact, a revealed truth, not up for debate: Divine Mercy. You are free to reject St. Faustina’s revelations completely and remain a good Catholic, as they are private revelation. But the Divine Mercy itself is not private revelation, it’s Scriptural.  The administration of Divine Mercy is the very business of the Church. It’s what She was built for. It’s why you’re aboard Her. (Fans of Star Trek TOS will recognize that device)

I also think it’s totally appropriate for this feast to occur on the Octave Day of Easter. It doesn’t mean the Octave Day of Easter has been suppressed… that’s like claiming that calling it Low Sunday or Dominica in Albis or Quasimodo diminishes the Octave. Furthermore, the TLM (1962) readings for today miraculously appear to be perfect selections to instruct us on the Divine Mercy, even though the old missal obviously pre-dates the institution of the feast. Have you ever noticed that? Yes, I said miraculous. God knows what he is doing.

EPISTLE I John 5:4-10. “Beloved: For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world. And this is the victory which overcameth the world: Our faith. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God? This is he that came by water and blood, Jesus Christ: not by water only but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit which testifieth that Christ is the truth. And there are Three who give testimony in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost. And these three are one. And there are three that give testimony on earth: the spirit and the water and the blood. And these three are one. If we receive the testimony of men, the testimony of God is greater. For this is the testimony of God, which is greater, because he hath testified of his Son. He that believeth in the Son of God hath the testimony of God in himself.”

How can you read that and not have the image of Divine Mercy come to mind?

Note that the Epistle and Gospel are both from St. John the Apostle.

GOSPEL John 20:19-31. “At that time, when it was late the same day, the first of the week, and the doors were shut, where the disciples were gathered together, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in the midst and said to them: “Peace be to you.” And when he had said this, he shewed them his hands and his side. The disciples therefore were glad, when they saw the Lord. He said therefore to them again: “Peace be to you. As the Father hath sent me, I also send you.” When he had said this, he breathed on them; and he said to them: “Receive ye the Holy Ghost. Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them: and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained.” Now Thomas, one of the twelve, who is called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came. The other disciples therefore said to him: “We have seen the Lord.” But he said to them: “Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails and put my finger into the place of the nails and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.” And after eight days, again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them. Jesus cometh, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst and said: “Peace be to you.” Then he said to Thomas: “Put in thy finger hither and see my hands. And bring hither the hand and put it into my side. And be not faithless, but believing.” Thomas answered and said to him: “My Lord and my God.” Jesus saith to him: “Because thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen and have believed.” Many other signs also did Jesus in the sight of his disciples, which are not written in this book. But these are written, that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God: and that believing, you may have life in his name.”

So here we read, on Divine Mercy Sunday and the Octave Day of Easter, of the institution of the Sacrament of Confession. Is that not wholly appropriate? The preaching today inevitably focuses on St. Thomas, with the earlier portion of the Gospel ignored. Which is too bad, since the Sacrament of Confession is also largely ignored in the N.O. Church today, except for 3:00-3:15pm on Saturdays and by appointment only. A billion “Catholics” all over the world who think they don’t need Confession, who effectively reject it as a sacrament, wherefore rejecting the Divine Mercy. Woe to them. Christ’s offer of peace, cited twice in today’s Gospel, comes only through the Spirit, blood, and water of Divine Mercy, conferred by Grace.

Christ instructed Sister Faustina: “My daughter, tell the whole world about my inconceivable mercy. I desire that the Feast of Mercy be a refuge and shelter for all souls and especially for poor sinners. On that day, the very depths of my tender mercy are opened…the divine floodgates through which grace flows are opened. Let no soul fear to draw near to Me, even though its sins be as scarlet…Mankind will not have peace until it turns to the font of my mercy.”

“even though its sins be as scarlet…” <raises hand>

Thanks be to God for His Divine Mercy.

There sure are a lot of folks worrying about what the Conclave might bring. With the vast majority of red hats appointed by an antipope, it raises questions, but this is NOT an unprecedented situation. There have been dozens of antipopes, who appointed dozens and dozens of Cardinals, who in turn have voted in Conclaves which elected valid popes. At the Council of Constance, multiple Cardinals who had been appointed by multiple rival antipopes, voted to depose those antipopes and then validly elected a true Pope!  The See is vacant (since31 Dec 2022), and this Conclave will have been validly convoked (unlike in 2013). So now we wait and see… because a heretic cannot be Pope. The Office of the Papacy is conferred BY CHRIST HIMSELF. Not by the Cardinals, not by the Church. Remember this, and fear not. Prepare to engage your rational intellect.

EPISTLE I Peter 2:1-10.
Beloved: Wherefore laying away all malice and all guile and dissimulations and envies and all detractions, As newborn babes, desire the rational milk without guile, that thereby you may grow unto salvation: If so be you have tasted that the Lord is sweet. Unto whom coming, as to a living stone, rejected indeed by men but chosen and made honourable by God: Be you also as living stones built up, a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ. Wherefore it is said in the scripture: “Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious. And he that shall believe in him shall not be confounded.” To you therefore that believe, he is honour: but to them that believe not, “the stone which the builders rejected, the same is made the head of the corner:” And, “a stone of stumbling and a rock of scandal,” to them who stumble at the word, neither do believe, whereunto also they are set. But you are a chosen generation, a kingly priesthood, a holy nation, a purchased people: that you may declare his virtues, who hath called you out of darkness into his marvelous light: Who in times past were not a people: but are now the people of God. Who had not obtained mercy: but now have obtained mercy.

NEXT POPE: APOSTASY OR HOPE?

EASTER MINI-COURSE Begins Sunday April 27th

Who are the leading candidates to be the next Pope? Who are the apostates and who might return to Tradition? Is the next Conclave guaranteed to produce a valid Pope? How in Church History have antipopes been dethroned? What can Mary’s Apparitions and the Prophecy of Malachy teach us? Who is the Akita “Judas Pope”? Who is Fatima’s “Bishop in White”? Who St. Malachy’s “Peter the Roman”? And can lowly lay faithful truly turn the tide of evil?

ENROLL

Weekly Live Classes start Sunday April 27th, at 5pm PDT/8pm EDT and will run approximately 70-80 minutes. Q&A will follow for 10 minutes or more for those who can stay. I will suggest readings. No tests. No pressure. Content: Ages 13 and up. Recorded video link sent afterwards so you can watch on your own time! Join us this Easter Season. (Projected duration 4 weeks)

 

The picture above is the niche at St. Mary Mary wherein Antipope Bergolio will be interred in the ground beneath that slab.

Flashback (sorry, tldr, but worth it):

Visibility: God is not a jerk, the signs are literally everywhere, WAKE UP

Originally posted February 19, 2021

Miss B. has been writing about the satanic pectoral cross that is being used by Antipope Bergoglio as he rules over the anti-church. Closer inspection of said cross reveals more interesting details by the day.

It is the same cross used by the satanic pedo sodo Cardinal Bernardin back in the 1970s-90s, and this hardly seems a coincidence. It was Bernardin who ritualistically raped an 11 year old girl, known as “Agnes,” at a satanic black mass conducted by his bishop John Russell inside St. Mary’s church in Greenville, South Carolina in 1957. Agnes’ story, including her polygraph test results, can be found in Randy Engel’s The Rite of Sodomy, beginning on page 910.

Six years later, just six days into the pontificate of Pope Paul VI of odious memory, another black mass was conducted for the enthronement of Satan at the Vatican, inside the Pauline Chapel, on the Feast of SS Peter and Paul, 29 June 1963. It is at this event where Malachi Martin uses creative license to place Agnes’ rape in Windswept House. This black mass/enthronement was, at the time, the crowning achievement of the Sodo-Masonic infiltration, where they intended and “prayed for” the true Catholic Church to be subsumed by the anti-church, as the “Universal Church of Man” (Windswept House, beginning on page 16).

It makes one wonder if the events in Greenville were in fact an enthronement of Satan in the United States of America. The timing seems about right, doesn’t it? Bernardin went on to become a bishop at the age of 38, head of the USCCB, and finally Cardinal Archbishop of Chicago in 1982. He ruled the American Church and hand picked practically every bishop until his death in 1996.

Fast-forward to 2019-21. Moloch-worshiping “catholic” faux POTUS in DC, subject of Cardinal Archbishop Wilton Gregory, who himself was personally chosen and consecrated a bishop at the age of 36 at the hands of Bernardin. Arch-heretic antipope squatting on the Chair of St. Peter. Lies and blasphemies on a daily basis. Diabolical inversion of truth regarding all manner of the moral law. Pachamama enthroned… demon worship inside St. Peter’s and on the high altar itself. Then shortly thereafter, the true and pure unblemished sacrifice was taken away altogether; there has not been Mass said on that altar – the pope’s altar – in nearly a year. Do you think that too might be a visible sign of something being very, very wrong? https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/a-symbolic-sign-after-the-pachamama-worship-at-st-peters-papal-altar-unused-for-months-now

I am mirroring, below, all three posts from Miss B. regarding the pectoral cross, with permission. I only have two items to add to the backward/inverted leg/foot demon motif: Scroll down to the image of the full cross. First, take a look at the “sheep” on the far left of the cross. I smell bacon. Second, turn the image upside down. Look at the tunic, below the belt. Is that a hand grasping a phallus?

Folks, read it all. Click the links. It’s all out in the open.

---

The Satanic Bernardin-Bergoglio Pectoral Cross: “Why are the feet facing different directions?” Because the figure isn’t Christ… it is the ANTICHRIST

Now THIS is extremely creepy.

An eagle-eyed reader sent a very short email regarding the posts on the Bernardin-Bergoglio super-creepy pectoral cross. “Why are the feet facing different directions?”

I made the Scooby-Doo inquisitive noise and pulled up my picture and zoomed in on the legs and feet of the figure, and sure enough, absolutely no mistake, the leg on our left is facing backward – you can clearly see the musculature of the calf shows that the view is from the rear, you can see the anatomy of the knee is from the rear, and the foot itself is the view of the Achilles’ tendon and heel. The leg and foot on our right is clearly front-facing, as it should be.

So I start looking up “backward leg or foot” and… guys, it’s NEVER good. It is a UNIVERSAL motif of the demonic. As in, inversion, mirror images, the sowing of confusion, deception, leading people astray, especially children, oftentimes to ritual death. Just a few of the demonic “backwards leg/foot” entries include:

Tata Duende (Mayan demon, child kidnapper)

Churel (South Asian demon, vampiric, hunts young men especially)

Pichal Peri (Himalayan demon)

Curupira (Brazilian demon)

Bhoots (Indian demon-ghosts)

Ciguapa (Dominican Republic demon)

Again, the common linkage with the motif of one or both legs/feet being reversed is that of DECEPTION and leading victims astray by confusion. Is the demon coming or going? Which way is it facing? The demon has a superficial initial appearance of normalcy, but is actually an inversion or MIRROR IMAGE.

If this isn’t apropos of the Bergoglian Antipapacy and the Antichurch of which he is the public face, I don’t know what is.

So now we not only see why the Bernardin-Bergoglio “pectoral cross” has a figure with a reversed leg and foot, but we also see the significance to the Luciferian cabal of usurpers at war with Jesus Christ and His Holy Church.

The figure on the Bernardin-Bergoglio pectoral cross isn’t Christ. It is the ANTICHRIST.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on February 19, ARSH 2021 by Ann Barnhardt.

More Photo Evidence on the Satanist Cardinal Bernardin, His Creepy Pectoral Cross That Antipope Bergoglio Also Wears, and the Satanic Grand Orient

Original post here.

Now, add:

https://oto-uk.org

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on February 18, ARSH 2021 by Ann Barnhardt.

Remember Antipope Bergoglio’s creepy pectoral Cross? Well, it’s EXACTLY the same Cross worn by the Satanist pedophile rapist, Cardinal Joseph Bernardin

Okay. Bernardin was the American satanist who was shot straight to the top of the American church and decided who was elevated to the episcopacy in the US from the late 1960s until his death in ARSH 1996.

Bernardin was the man depicted in the opening chapter of Malachi Martin’s “Windswept House” who co-presided with Bishop John Russell over the black Mass in South Carolina that was performed concurrently with a black Mass in the Pauline Chapel inside the Vatican to “enthrone satan” in the late 1950s. The child who was raped in the South Carolina black Mass, “Agnes”, corresponded with me in ARSH 2014 and confirmed that Bernardin co-presided over the South Carolina black Mass and raped her at the “consecration” equivalent. Agnes’ father was a satanist in South Carolina and provided her to the coven and was present when she was ritually raped.

Bernardin has been recruited by satanists out of the gay bar scene in Charleston when he was a pre-med undergrad at USC. The satanists placed him into seminary and saw to it that he shot straight to the top of the American church. Bernardin was made a bishop at age 38, and at age 40 was the head of the US bishops’ conference, a position of power which he retained until his death, and his coven of protégées still control to this day.

Bernardin was a key supporter of Saul Alinsky, and Bernardin paid for Barack Obama (Barry Soetoro) to be brought to Chicago and be trained in Alinskyism.

Read my piece from ARSH 2012, “The Bernardin-Alinsky-Obama Nexus” here.

Antipope Bergoglio has worn a creepy pectoral Cross with Christ (?) depicted with arms crossed since his elevation in Buenos Aires. On the left is Bergoglio before usurping the Petrine See, and on the right is after the usurpation, with a new silver version of the same Cross:

It is thought that this is actually a satanic icon, rooted in “Osiris”, and that the odd “dove” at the top is actually a goat head with horns, stylized so as to be claimed to be “a dove”. The face of the man looks like an evil death mask.

Not coincidentally, in December of ARSH 2019, a Pachamama worship ritual was performed at a televised Vatican “Christmas concert”, led by an Amazonian witch. These were the last days before the global putsch of the Covid political religion and the global interdict of the Catholic Church. This screen cap is literally of the Pachamama worship ritual inside the Paul VI hall inside the Vatican:

But here’s the new info, sent in by an eagle-eyed reader. This pectoral cross that Antipope Bergoglio wears is EXACTLY the same as that worn by the Satanist Cardinal Bernardin:

Interestingly, Wilton Gregory, the black sodomite hand-picked by the faggot Cardinal Donald Wuerl, himself a protégée of Uncle Ted McCarrick, to replace Wuerl in Washington DC, was Bernardin’s protégée (and assumed sodomy partner.) Here is a picture of the known satanist and child rapist Bernardin consecrating Wilton Gregory a Bishop at age 36, on Halloween ARSH 1983, and a picture of Gregory serving Bernardin’s Mass. You can see the edge of Bernardin’s pectoral Cross. Given Wilton Gregory’s flaming homosexuality and intimate connection with Bernardin, it is not at all unreasonable to suspect Wilton Gregory of being connected to Satanism. Which makes him just perfect to be the Cardinal Archbishop of Washington DC.

EASTER MINI-COURSE Begins Sunday April 27th

Who are the leading candidates to be the next Pope? Who are the apostates and who might return to Tradition? Is the next Conclave guaranteed to produce a valid Pope? How in Church History have antipopes been dethroned? What can Mary’s Apparitions and the Prophecy of Malachy teach us? Who is the Akita “Judas Pope”? Who is Fatima’s “Bishop in White”? Who St. Malachy’s “Peter the Roman”? And can lowly lay faithful truly turn the tide of evil?

ENROLL

Weekly Live Classes start Sunday April 27th, at 5pm PDT/8pm EDT and will run approximately 70-80 minutes. Q&A will follow for 10 minutes or more for those who can stay. I will suggest readings. No tests. No pressure. Content: Ages 13 and up. Recorded video link sent afterwards so you can watch on your own time! Join us this Easter Season. (Projected duration 4 weeks)

Happy Easter Tuesday!

GRADUAL Ps. 117:24; Ps. 106:2
This is the day the Lord has made; let us be glad and rejoice in it. Let those who have been redeemed by the Lord now speak, those whom He has redeemed from the hand of the enemy and gathered together from all lands. Alleluia, alleluia! The Lord is risen from the sepulchre, who for us hung upon a tree.

Christ is truly risen! Best week of the year, folks. Church law dictates that there is no mourning for anything or anyone during the Octave. Every day of the Octave is a first class feast that cannot be trumped. Don’t shoot the messenger. Party must continue.

Pray for eyes to be opened. Mine, yours, your loved ones’. He is the opener of eyes, on His schedule. The fruit of the fourth sorrowful mystery is patience. This is primarily patience with yourself, so as not to become frustrated as you stumble along the uneven path toward sanctity. But it is also patience with others, and even patience with God. Think about it. Think about how patient He is with us, but how we demand immediate results from Him. Abandon yourself to the Divine Providence… the inventor of time is Himself the Timekeeper.

Yesterday’s Gospel had us on the road to Emmaus, on the very first Easter Monday. After their miraculous encounter with Christ as He consecrated the first post-resurrection Eucharist, the disciples immediately set out back to Jerusalem. Having traveled all day to Emmaus, they traveled all night back. So today’s Gospel is the immediate continuation of yesterday’s, taking place on the very first Easter Tuesday. As they are all gathered together, Jesus pops in for some fish. Because even though they had left everything behind in order to follow him, and had received more teaching directly from God than anyone else, “they yet believed not.”

They yet believed not.

Meditate on how this dynamic is at play in your life today. Happy Easter!

“By blood-sealed covenant, by prophetic utterances and figures, and by prescriptions for sacrificial worship, God tried to prepare His people to expect a Redeemer who would have to bleed and die. But they wanted only a glorious conqueror with a universal and endless reign. Even when Jesus appeared to the Eleven, who had received two and one-half years of special training and instruction, He found them confused and wondering. As a doctrine, Christ crucified is central to Christian life. In practice, is there not much insistence on a comfortable Christ, a Christ without wounds?“

https://tridentine-mass.blogspot.com/2022/04/easter-tuesday.html

GOSPEL Luke 24:36-47.
At that time, Now, whilst they were speaking these things, Jesus stood in the midst of them and saith to them: “Peace be to you. It is I: Fear not.” But they being troubled and frightened, supposed that they saw a spirit. And he said to them: “Why are you troubled, and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? See my hands and feet, that it is I myself. Handle, and see: for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as you see me to have.” And when he had said this, he shewed them his hands and feet. But while they yet believed not and wondered for joy, he said: “Have you here any thing to eat?” And they offered him a piece of a broiled fish and a honeycomb. And when he had eaten before them, taking the remains, he gave to them. And he said to them: “These are the words which I spoke to you while I was yet with you, that all things must needs be fulfilled which are written in the law of Moses and in the prophets and in the psalms, concerning me.” Then he opened their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures. And he said to them: “Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer and to rise again from the dead, the third day: And that penance and remission of sins should be preached in his name, unto all nations.”

 

(Prudent deployment from Miss B. The timing is remarkable, IYKYK.)