The Vires Law Group (VLG), with the support of the Former Feds Group Freedom Foundation, announces the filing of a request to Arizona Attorney General, Kris Mayes, for a criminal investigation of Dr. Anthony Fauci and other officials for alleged crimes committed against citizens of Arizona prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The filing is specific to Arizona state criminal statutes and contains information of thirty-six (36) victims to include letters from nine (9) of the families of these victims. Similar filings have been submitted on behalf of their respective constituents to the Attorneys General and District Attorneys of Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Missouri, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania.
This effort to investigate Dr. Fauci and other accused persons is supported by donations from individuals and organizations such as the Diamond Mind Foundation and the Fight Like A Flynn PAC run by former National Security Advisor, retired Lieutenant General Mike Flynn.
Families of the victims request investigation into the deaths of their loved ones under Covid hospital protocols, intentional COVID-19 infection mismanagement, and suppression and denial of life-saving treatments in Arizona hospitals, nursing homes, and other facilities. Thanks to the efforts of victims around the country, there are currently two open criminal investigations by county prosecutors in two states at the time of this press release. Some of the alleged violations of Arizona criminal statues include:
– Trafficking of Persons for Forced Labor or Services
– Kidnapping
In addition to Anthony Fauci, the following individuals and officers are subjects of the requested investigation:
– Cliff Lane, Deputy Director, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
– Francis Collins, ex-Director, National Institutes of Health
– Deborah Birx, ex-White House COVID Response Coordinator & former Director of DOD HIV Research at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
– Rochelle Walensky, ex-Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
– Stephen Hahn, ex-Commissioner, Federal Drug Administration
– Janet Woodcock, Principal Deputy Commissioner, Federal Drug Administration
– Peter Hotez, Dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine & Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine
– Robert Redfield, ex-Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
– Peter Daszak, President, Eco-Health Alliance
– Ralph Baric, Professor, University of North Carolina
– Rick Bright, Former Director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
– The Administrators and Healthcare Providers of several hospital systems and facilities providing care to patients in Arizona
The VLG attorneys who extensively researched and compiled the filing, along with many other concerned citizens, believe that it is essential that the Arizona Attorney General and her staff conduct a thorough investigation to determine if the evidence contained in the submission, together with further evidence to be uncovered, substantiates indictment and prosecution of the identified suspects for the alleged crimes. If the evidence provides probable cause that crimes have been committed, then it is expected that the State of Arizona will prosecute the accused to the fullest extent of the law.
Calls for accountability are coming from all over the nation and even the halls of Congress as expressed by Senators Ron Johnson, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, and many others. Based on the current legal landscape, if these culpable federal officers and former officers are ever to be held accountable and punished for their COVID-related crimes, such justice must be delivered by a state or county level criminal process. We urge the people of Arizona to stand with these victims and their families and support the District Attorneys and Attorney General in bringing to light the truth of the victims’ suffering and death, and the suffering of their families, and in bringing justice against these egregious crimes.
If you would like to donate to support this effort, you may make a tax-deductible gift at https://formerfedsgroup.org/donate/ and designate it for “AG Action”.
Today is the 160th anniversary of the Surrender at Appomattox Courthouse.
It was Palm Sunday.
General Lee had abandoned Richmond a week earlier, followed by Petersburg four days later. Retreating west, attempting to meet supply lines and reinforcements, his men starving, Lee sent a letter to Grant to request peace terms. Grant replied, with generosity.
Unlike the unarmed protesters of J6, the entire Army of Northern Virginia were not imprisoned, not one man, not for one day. Not only that, every man was allowed to keep his sidearms and horses. Their lands were not confiscated. Lincoln would never have allowed for this, nor Sherman, but Grant wanted the healing to begin straight away.
If you grew up in the North, and you think you know the history and causes of the Civil War, think again. Start with the fact that Lincoln was dead set on war from the outset. Look into the reasons for secession, and you will find that the breaking point for many states was Lincoln’s forced conscription of their citizenry to fight their own countrymen. That proved to be too much for the various governors and legislatures. Search and read their written responses to this executive tyranny.
“I have always thought it appropriate that the national nightmare we call the Civil War ended during Holy Week 1865. Two remarkably decent men, Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant, began the process of healing so desperately needed for America on Palm Sunday, April 9, 1865 at Appomattox. We take their decency for granted, but it is the exception and not the rule for the aftermath of civil wars in history. The usual course would have been unremitting vengeance by the victors, and sullen rage by the defeated, perhaps eventually breaking out in guerilla war. The end of the Civil War could so very easily have been the beginning of a cycle of unending war between north and south. Instead, both Grant and Lee acted to make certain as far as they could that the fratricidal war that had just concluded would not be repeated. All Americans owe those two men a large debt for their actions at Appomattox.”
A bombshell study published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, confirms ventilators killed more COVID-19 patients than the virus itself, triggering deadly bacterial pneumonia in ICU wards and vindicating conspiracy theorists who’ve been sounding the alarm for years.
The study, conducted by a team at Northwestern University, analyzed records from 585 ICU patients at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, including 190 with COVID-19, all battling severe pneumonia or respiratory failure. Using cutting-edge machine learning, researchers uncovered a pattern that shatters the official story.
Forget the hyped-up “cytokine storm”—the idea that COVID triggered a fatal inflammatory meltdown. That theory crumbled under scrutiny, with no evidence of multi-organ failure in the patients studied.
Instead, the real killer emerged: ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), a bacterial infection sparked by the very machines meant to save lives.
Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine during the 2024-2025 respiratory viral season.
Methods Employees of Cleveland Clinic in employment in Ohio on October 1, 2024, were included. The cumulative incidence of influenza among those in the vaccinated and unvaccinated states was compared over the following 25 weeks. Protection provided by vaccination (analyzed as a time-dependent covariate) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results Among 53402 employees, 43857 (82.1%) had received the influenza vaccine by the end of the study. Influenza occurred in 1079 (2.02%) during the study. The cumulative incidence of influenza was similar for the vaccinated and unvaccinated states early, but over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, clinical nursing job, and employment location, the risk of influenza was significantly higher for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated state (HR, 1.27; 95% C.I., 1.07 – 1.51; P = 0.007), yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of −26.9% (95% C.I., −55.0 to −6.6%).
Conclusions This study found that influenza vaccination of working-aged adults was associated with a higher risk of influenza during the 2024-2025 respiratory viral season, suggesting that the vaccine has not been effective in preventing influenza this season.
This study analyzed over 53,000 Cleveland Clinic employees and found that those who received the influenza vaccine during the 2024–2025 season were statistically more likely to contract influenza compared to those who remained unvaccinated. After adjusting for key factors like age, sex, job role, and location, the data showed a 27% higher risk of influenza among the vaccinated group (Hazard Ratio = 1.27). This led to a negative vaccine effectiveness estimate of −26.9%.
Take heed to yourselves, and to the whole flock, wherein the Holy Ghost hath placed you bishops, to rule the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood. I know that, after my departure, ravening wolves will enter in among you, not sparing the flock. And of your own selves shall arise men speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. Acts 20:28-30
A man that is a heretic, after the first and second admonition, avoid: Knowing that he, that is such an one, is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned by his own judgment. Titus 3:10-11
Whosoever revolteth, and continueth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that continueth in the doctrine, the same hath both the Father and the Son. If any man come to you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him, God speed you. For he that saith unto him, God speed you, communicateth with his wicked works. 2 John 1:9-11
Now the Spirit manifestly saith, that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error, and doctrines of devils, Speaking lies in hypocrisy, and having their conscience seared….” 1 Tim 4:1-2
For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables. 2 Tim 4:3-4
But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there shall be among you lying teachers, who shall bring in sects of perdition, and deny the Lord who bought them: bringing upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their riotousnesses, through whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you. Whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their perdition slumbereth not. 2 Peter 2:1-3
Jorge Bergoglio is not now, never was, nor ever will be, Pope of the Roman Catholic Church, thanks be to God. I am short on time today, so can we just all agree that a non-Catholic cannot be head of the Church he doesn’t belong to?
Today is the feast of St. Vincent Ferrer, a saint who performed miracles while he yet lived. He mistakenly backed an antipope for a time, but the man he back was fully Catholic, just as all previous antipopes have been Catholic. That is what makes the current situation so obvious.
St. Vincent, Angel of the Judgment, pray for us.
Commemoration of SAINT VINCENT FERRER Vincent Ferrer (1350-1419) was a great Spanish Dominican missionary and master of souls. One biographer claims that Vincent’s labors in Spain brought 25,000 Jews into the Church; he also won numerous Moorish converts for the Faith. In addition to carrying on an inspired apostolate in Spain, he preached to thousands of persons in France, Switzerland, and Italy [By his preaching and miracles, he converted thousands of sinners and heretics.]. He pleaded so eloquently for penance that he was known as the “Angel of the Judgment.”
Second Collect: O God, who didst vouchsafe to glorify Thy Church by the merits and preaching of blessed Vincent, Thy Confessor: grant to us Thy servants that we may be taught by his example, and delivered by his patronage from all adversities…
To understand his presence, you need to look at how he stole the show especially in secondary roles. That would include, surprisingly, the original Top Gun (1986). What am I talking about?
If you had to guess, how much screen time would you say he had as Iceman? Stop reading, close your eyes, and guess. Full running time of Top Gun was 110 minutes.
Don’t peek!
The answer is ten minutes. The entire recollection you just composed of Iceman was based on ten minutes of encounter.
What about Top Gun: Maverick (2022). Tom Cruise had to fight for this scene to be included. Did you cry? Don’t lie. The entire IMAX theater was crying. Screen time: Four minutes, 40 seconds.
But my favorite has to be Heat(1995). In this film, he’s playing not even second fiddle but THIRD fiddle, behind Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro.
Kilmer’s character, Chris Shiherlis, is the crew’s principal sniper and safe-cracker, and the only married man of the bunch. His relationship with his wife, played by Ashley Judd before she went batshit crazy, is something to behold. They both give fantastic performances, understated, in stark contrast to not only Pacino and DeNiro, but the entire violent framework of the film.
But the scene I am posting below is the iconic bank robbery shootout, because of course I am. During production, DeNiro’s crew were trained in weaponry/tactics by actual ex-Special Forces, if I remember correctly. Watch Kilmer drop his mag, reload, and resume the firefight in under two seconds, at the eight minute mark.
Not only did the visuals come off spectacular, when they went to overdub the sound in post-production, they ended up using the original recording from the street, because it sounded so good.
Side note, this scene played out in real life two years later, in the North Hollywood Shootout. It led to law enforcement finally ditching their revolvers and adopting semi-auto sidearms, and carrying rifles in their vehicles as SOP. You might even say it spurred the full militarization of local LE, down to the outlandish SWAT units of today.
Here is the clip, but you will have to click through to youtube due to R rating. Violence and language, obviously. See the whole movie for Val, and pray he made it through the spiritual warfare in real life. RIP.
(I can hardly believe this was 25 years ago. He had stunned the field at the Masters three years earlier, winning by 12 strokes after starting out 4-over on the first nine holes, but this was an otherworldly four days of perfection. -nvp)
The Top 5 Craziest Stats from Tiger’s 2000 U.S. Open Victory
Tiger Woods as seen during the final round of the 2000 U.S. Open at Pebble Beach. (John Mummert/USGA)
It has been 25 years since the 100th U.S. Open, when Tiger Woods defeated the field by a preposterous 15-stroke margin.
Many words have been written about his historic performance. For this piece, though, we are focusing on the numbers that changed the history of golf.
So, sit back and read in awe. We unearthed some of the most incredible statistics from that week to illustrate how unbelievable it was.
1. Tiger had two bogey-free rounds. The other 155 players combined for 1.
2. He didn’t three-putt all week.
3. He hit 70.8 percent of greens in regulation in a week when the field average was 48.7 percent. His 51 greens hit were seven more than any other player.
4. He could have given the player who finished in last place 40 shots and still would have beaten him.
5. The field averaged 5 bogeys per round. Tiger made 6 bogeys all week.
The five stats above are some of the most impressive. But the list does not stop there. Here are some honorable mentions:
• He played the first 22 holes of the championship without a bogey and the final 26 holes of the championship without a bogey.
• Of the 437 rounds played, Tiger’s score was only beaten once in the same round (R3. Ernie Els 68, Tiger 71)
• He made one triple bogey all week. If he had made one triple bogey every day, he still would’ve won by three shots
• Tiger is the only player to win a major by 10 strokes or more in the 20th or 21st centuries. He’s done it twice: 1997 Masters (12) and 2000 U.S. Open (15).
• He gained 29.2 strokes against the field, the highest total in any U.S. Open since World War II. That number is 3.91 strokes better than the second-best performance since World War II – the same as the difference between No. 2 and No. 19 on the list.
• He led the field in scoring on the par 3s, par 4s and par 5s, shooting 4-under in each category.
Today is the 20th anniversary of the death of Pope John Paul II. You can hardly find any commentary at any Catholic blog/outlet. I find it odd.
I remember being exhausted at his long declining health, amid the exposure of the infestation of sodomite rapist priests in 2002 and subsequent aftermath. Which of course we were still being lied to, and told even by “conservative” pastors how the media had really blown everything out of proportion. In reality, we didn’t know the half of it. Thank you, Randy Engel.
We didn’t know a lot of things in 2005, did we? And the troubles we did know of, we thought for sure when Ratzinger was elected a couple weeks later, he would fix them.
