Bergoglio is an antipope. Thanks be to God, and pass the stuffing.

Yes, we should GIVE THANKS that Bergoglio is an antipope. Because if he were true Pope, or ever had been, there would be a LOT of explaining to do. Remember, the Office of the Papacy is conferred by Christ Himself… not by the Cardinals, not by the Church, but by Christ Himself. In doing so, He binds Himself to the Officeholder in a special way, whereby the man is transformed into His Vicar on earth, supernaturally incapable of teaching error in matters of faith and morals. After all, what good is the Papacy without such protections? Christ, being God, cannot bind himself to error, much less outright heresy and apostasy. In fact, this is the biggest contrast between Bergoglio and all the dozens of other antipopes throughout history… all the rest were Catholic! So give thanks, enjoy this little essay, and pray for Jorge’s conversion. Your duty is such. Happy Thanksgiving!

Is Francis a Pope or a Pretender?

“At this point, however it seems that the faith of many Catholics will be more badly shaken should Francis turn out to be the true pope. How, it will be asked, could God allow his Church to be ruled by a man whose teachings contradict what Christ taught? Why does God permit the confusion and demoralization that Francis has wrought? Why does Francis bear so much animosity toward good and faithful Catholics like Bishop Strickland?

“The possibility that Francis is the pope does far more damage to the credibility of the Church than the possibility that he is not. If Francis continues to introduce novel and divisive changes to Church teachings on an almost weekly basis, then the credibility of the Church and the papacy will decline rapidly. If, on the other hand, he is revealed to be an imposter intent on subverting the Church, then much of the current turmoil would be seen in a new light. It would be seen not as the result of some inherent flaw in the Church, but as the result of a deliberate plot to destroy the Church.

“If Francis is actually an enemy of the Church, then it makes sense that he would favor harmful innovations—that he would be open to same-sex blessings, that he would participate in pagan rituals, that he would put the John Paul II Academy for Marriage and the Family in the hands of a man who would not be welcome in the homes of most Catholic families, that he would put another such man in charge of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, that he would issue a motu proprio calling for a radical paradigm shift in Catholic theology and on and on. All of these innovations have sown confusion in the Church. But that, it seems, is what they were intended to do.

“If Francis were really a false prophet, then it would be understandable that he thinks conversion is undesirable, that he tells seminarians to forgive all sin in the confessional even if there is no repentance, and that he maintains that sexual sins are nothing to worry about.

“If for some reason—an invalid resignation by Pope Benedict, a rigged papal election, or evidence that Bergoglio had no intention of guarding the Catholic faith—it becomes evident that Francis is not a valid pope, then many Catholics would breathe a sigh of relief. If Francis/Bergoglio is an antipope then the promises of Christ and the protection of the Holy Spirit do not apply to him. Catholics would be free to ignore his new doctrines, to resist him, and above all, to better understand the trial that has been visited on the Church.

“Some think that the antipope/false prophet accusations against Francis are reckless, but scripture teaches us that at some point in time, something of this nature is exactly what we should expect…”

https://turningpointproject.com/is-francis-a-pope-or-a-pretender/